Conq
Guest
wow so toxic
wow so toxic
We shouldn't be forcing groups of people to do anything, it's wrong, and in this case it's discriminatory.Expel? Its more or less force them to do what they are already supposed to do. The "feature" sucks and isnt supported by all too many, get over it.
A concept is a concept regardless of the scale it manifests.
Actually this wouldn't be considered a democratic vote, it would be considered direct democracy, which is a facet of many political ideologies. Unfortunately Anon's can't vote, and we are voting to expel people in their desired presence, so it's entirely corrupt.
Also i'm much further to the left than the liberal snowflakes who read CNN like the bible and are afraid to get their hands dirty.
I'm unsure how difficult that would be, that being said the political analogies are just my response to someone else already making a political point. Yet the fact is that forcing someone to identify as something that's not what they want to identify as, is very wrong, weather it be an issue of race, sexual orientation, gender, or anything really.Sure, but whether or not anons can post on a site is not the same concept as expelling people to make an ethno-state. Its not scale - its just a bad analogy designed to bias people one way or another on the issue by liking it to obviously bad things.
Again, bringing politics into this doesn't really serve any purpose except to incite people. This isn't a government and this isn't an official government position. This is a forum for a tiny subset of people who like to play WoW not at max level. Its not even a binding vote or anything. Its a poll to gather information.
And anons CAN vote...by creating an account or log into their existing account. They can then log out again and continue to be anonymous.
@Conq - How difficult is it to actually limit anons to being able to post, but not create threads?
I mean you may as well tell a transgender person they have to identify as something other than what they are in order to vote, it's just wrong.This shit is comedy. I now understand why people hate xpoff.
These anon's are apart of our society, it doesn't matter if they don't have a name, this vote is illegitimate because it only allows some to partake. It is corrupt by nature. I'm not saying that was the OP's intent, but it is what it is all the same.
We definitely should. Order and Chaos mate, its tipping towards chaos and unreliability with anons.We shouldn't be forcing groups of people to do anything, it's wrong, and in this case it's discriminatory.
That seems like a huge step from just removing anon's that only a handful of people actually like from a twinking website.I mean you may as well tell a transgender person they have to identify as something other than what they are in order to vote, it's just wrong.
That seems like a huge step from just removing anon's that only a handful of people actually like from a twinking website.
I mean you may as well tell a transgender person they have to identify as something other than what they are in order to vote, it's just wrong.
I'm unsure how difficult that would be, that being said the political analogies are just my response to someone else already making a political point. Yet the fact is that forcing someone to identify as something that's not what they want to identify as, is very wrong, weather it be an issue of race, sexual orientation, gender, or anything really.
ThinkingFaceHEY CAN BE ANYTHING THE WANT.
Simply identify as a person.
Rofl... this is literally hilarious. You are taking this small issue of whether or not it is fair for the community to have to wade through SOME anonymous nonsense simply because the FEW are too lazy to type in a trucking username and password. How much of their ever precious time would this actually take up.
The fact that you are trying to relate this to some sort of fascism or silencing is comedy. How old are you? I'm assuming you are a student at berkley or davis by the amount of ignorant trigger words used throughout that post.
Hoping I don't get banned for saying this to you but someone needs to. Save yourself the nonsense, and stop feeding people's absolute laziness.
Literally blows my mind people think like this, unless you are trolling and actually want the community to implode. If that is the case, bravo for your showmanship.
As to the last point...making an account is not even close to forcing someone to identify as something they don't want to.
Lol thank you, if a person wants to use this forum as an anonymous unregistered user, that doesn't put any personal information in aside from the IP registered when they access the site, it is their right to do so, taking that away would be wrong.Conq is far-left and doesn't hide it. I think the proper way to respond would be more along the lines of "Building the ethnostate for all races not just whites would only require everyone negotiating together who wants to continue to be part of the social experiment that is a fully multiculturalist nation and those who do not want to participate"
Actually I have no clue what we're talking about anymore how is removing anonymous posting stopping anyone from getting to post?
https://gyazo.com/9070ec3852a3dc77e5079dc2f873537d@Conq - How difficult is it to actually limit anons to being able to post, but not create threads?
Didn't we have something like that before the hijack? or am i mistaken...