You keep asking me to prove how *someone else* posted big numbers or asking me to replicate them and I ran out of ways to say "I dont fucking care" so I just stopped trying.Did you just quote yourself and then leave out the other half of the quote you just made .
You are journalistic magician!
Ill consider mentoring you.Well post a 197k for me on current SL elemental, and then I'll have respect for your friends.
[doublepost=1645624818,1645624735][/doublepost]
I'll ship you one you can strap to you head with duct-tape if you show me how to do 3x-4x the damage of any other shaman I have seen play in the bracket currently.
Ill consider mentoring you.
You did accuse me of being sad enough to beat up a turnip and then screenshot it. So ye, ill just make jokes.For 4x damage we can make all the jokes anybody needs to.
You did accuse me of being sad enough to beat up a turnip and then screenshot it. So ye, ill just make jokes.
And if you could keep saying how much better my damage is than everyone else thatd be great. Best part about this thread.
197k Looks like padding (and I promise you I'm not the only one thinking that), based on every other Shaman I have seen play *currently*. I don't play all day, but I play enough every day to see a lot and 40k-60k damage ranges. There are too many factors involved, elemental has slow casts, other twink competition on your own team killing targets, generally low damage linked to overload... etc. I don't know what's involved in getting a 197k damage game, I'd like to find out. We can even lower that to one of the 150k games.
Maybe its an EU/Russian/Whatever thing... maybe its the time of day... maybe myself and every other elemental shaman I see play has it wrong.
Just so we are 100% clear... it's not me comparing my personal experience to whatever damage ranges we are talking about... its me comparing what I can see with my own eyes every day to that damage range.
Dont take this the wrong way, but how does this have anything to do with Legion BoEs being a lame way to twink?
When did I say that? I mentioned the artifact weapons... yeah the pre-nerf Int bonus on those was outlandish and could easily account for huge numbers, I don't remember knocking any BoEs. I'm not interested in numbers coming from months ago using anything you can't currently get, out side of something like the valentines day neck, which is not that big of a deal.
I don't care what the build is to get to 197k... I don't care if its stacking Int/mastery/whatever... let's find out... as long as its a current build.
You are so far off of topic you don't even recall what OP's purpose of creating this post was.
Just giving you my share of experience. I wouldn't want this thread locked.The topic got derailed about 30 posts ago, you are just wandering in and commenting.
Staff had 49 int + spelldamage enchant, mh+off hand had 49+spelldamage+5 int outdoors (54 total without spelldamage)When did I say that? I mentioned the artifact weapons... yeah the pre-nerf Int bonus on those was outlandish and could easily account for huge numbers, I don't remember knocking any BoEs.
I'm not interested in numbers coming from months ago using anything you can't currently get, out side of something like the valentines day neck, which is not that big of a deal.
I don't care what the build is to get to 197k... I don't care if its stacking Int/mastery/whatever... let's find out... as long as its a current build. Because numbers in the 150k+ range are on par with just free casting on a targeting dummy... not having to chase down players in a BG, being in a fight the entire time, etc.
Maybe your gear isn't optimized?Or I'd just like to know. (And he did post multiple).
Because if I'm missing a way to triple my damage that does not involve pressing the same 4 buttons at targets I/ANYBODY ELSE clicks on... I'm all in.
Wouldn't you like to know how to triple/quad your damage?
Maybe your gear isn't optimized?
Staff had 49 int + spelldamage enchant, mh+off hand had 49+spelldamage+5 int outdoors (54 total without spelldamage)
Now you can get 29 int from boe + 6 int from gems + spelldamage +5 int outdoors. (40 total without spelldamage)
I dont think that 14 int was making this huge gap you always talking about.
P.S: Now im not sure, mayb it was 54 int and not 49, but anyways 19 int is not gamechanging thing in a way you trying to represent it.
Just giving you my share of experience. I wouldn't want this thread locked.
I mean... you might as well beI would have to be wearing whites
I mean... you might as well be
Maybe he doesn't get such numbers every game?
Maybe he just fought at mid/gy camped all game?
I could see a shaman pulling off such numbers in a long game when everyone is fighting.
Perhaps it's nothing to get all sweaty about.
think we found the problem...To Me Roadwarrior does not look terrible at all.
think we found the problem...