not sure how a flag return bot fits into farming honor/gold....Always the same inferior players trying to attack the top 19 guilds on the forums. Guess that's what you have to do if you can't compete in gulch.
Everyone knew that Pizza (and others) were running bots on their mains to farm honor, gold, mats or whatever else they didn't want to farm manually. Why is this such a big deal all of a sudden? It is almost as if the majority of the people in this thread just now found out what a bot is.
This is the whole DDoS drama all over: A bunch of people with little to no idea what they are talking about trying to crucify specific people for something entirely unrelated to 19s.
lmao, people in your guild have told me that you're on A-team because your friends with HB, not because your good, you were an average priest as best, and am i good? pay more attention to the forums and you'll see, also, having a girlfriend isn't the most important thing in the world, although you know that already considering how shitty you treat them
The greater question in this thread raises the ethical issues that necessarily crop up when it is very evident that certain individuals are gaining an unfair competitive advantage, through the use of automatic flag pickup bots, advanced combat routines, etc.Started from a R.I.P thread now we here
Lawl, and you can do jumps? remember back in early mop when you used to suck up to my fcing wishing you could someday be as good as me? You might not since you've became so corrupt with the 19 bracket since then, also i know more about you than you think, have fun living alone? lol grow up, you're what 20 years old now? and still have the logic of a 15 year old
Anyways, done with this pointless convo, i have much better things to do, such as college and enjoy life, not WoW
Correlation does not imply causation is a phrase used in science and statistics to emphasize that a correlation between two variables does not necessarily imply that one causes the other.[1][2] Many statistical tests calculate correlation between variables. A few go further and calculate the likelihood of a true causal relationship; examples are the Granger causality test and convergent cross mapping.
The counter assumption, that correlation proves causation, is considered a questionable cause logical fallacy in that two events occurring together are taken to have a cause-and-effect relationship. This fallacy is also known as cum hoc ergo propter hoc, Latin for "with this, therefore because of this", and "false cause". A similar fallacy, that an event that follows another was necessarily a consequence of the first event, is sometimes described as post hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin for "after this, therefore because of this").
clearly wikipedia. cba to type all that and it simply gets it across better than I couldnot sure if really good in talking english like that or just wikipedia.
Drayner is free to comment on this as well, but I fully expected hate and vitriol to come my way when I initially brought this issue to light. My views won't be popular to everyone, especially the class of twinks I stand here accusing, but the issues must be raised regardless. And I intend to do so.
if you think that Harvest and Skill Ratio aren't going to be the last 2 teams standing in the TC then you are clearly lost in MOP
If you honestly think top players in the bracket use combat routines on their 19s, you are misinformed. Any 19 using a combat routine would play much worse than any respectable player in the bracket. Anyone who has any knowledge on how the combat routines work would know this.
I will use this added motivation and drive that you haters and doubters have provided me with to take my team to the next level. i'll see you all in war games/premades over the summer and ultimately the Twink Cup. Anyone who thinks they are the "best" or whatever, I expect to see you in the Twink Cup. Put your money where your mouth is.
Summary so far:
Resto - kid is nerd raging almost like DCM
Zeiren - guy is just crutching on Ctrl V
Drayner - the devils advocate
Painaid - the lawyer I will hire when I get a traffic ticket
Pizza - for a lack of better words: exposed
EU swines - popcorn?
Don't forget
Hass- The obnoxious guy that will lose tonight in the 3v3 vs eu swines
Don't forget
Hass- The obnoxious guy that will lose tonight in the 3v3 vs eu swines
Sadly you are misinformed kid. If you want to recall, a time and date was not decided/agreed on not to mention a comp. The esteemed Drcooper and myself have not yet talked further and have encountered a bump in the road due to my tinker account being on a 6 month hiatus. This will happen, I just need to make a toon for a comp we will agree on. Continue being lost, small, and pathetic.
Drcooper, our thread viewer record has been overtaken.. we held strong as long as we could.
If you recall, those kind words are what ended you up in a losing battle against a superior team of eu swine, If you would like to 3v3 me as well, I would be more than happy to put you down. The time of your relevancy has past. Oh wait, it never existed.
Correlation does not imply causation is a phrase used in science and statistics to emphasize that a correlation between two variables does not necessarily imply that one causes the other.[1][2] Many statistical tests calculate correlation between variables. A few go further and calculate the likelihood of a true causal relationship; examples are the Granger causality test and convergent cross mapping.
The counter assumption, that correlation proves causation, is considered a questionable cause logical fallacy in that two events occurring together are taken to have a cause-and-effect relationship. This fallacy is also known as cum hoc ergo propter hoc, Latin for "with this, therefore because of this", and "false cause". A similar fallacy, that an event that follows another was necessarily a consequence of the first event, is sometimes described as post hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin for "after this, therefore because of this").