Questions & Answers

By sheer force of will of course.
My idea is that every specific body strives to become master over all space and to extend its force (its will to power) and to thrust back all that resists its extension. But it continually encounters similar efforts on the part of other bodies and ends by coming to an arrangement ("union") with those of them that are sufficiently related to it: thus they then conspire together for power. And the process goes on.

—Nietzsche from The Will to Power, s.636
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yah, he made such a glaring mistake when he declared that God is dead that all his credibility is lost to me.

"Ve believe in nossing, Lebowski."
"Yahhh."
"Fucking nihilists, dude."

"The fool has said in his heart, 'there is no God.'" -Psalm 14:1

Nietzsche was a fucking idiot.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yah, he made such a glaring mistake when he declared that God is dead that all his credibility is lost to me.

"Ve believe in nossing, Lebowski."
"Yahhh."
"Fucking nihilists, dude."

"The fool has said in his heart, 'there is no God.'" -Psalm 14:1

Nietzsche was a fucking idiot.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Nietzsche is one of the most misunderstood of philosophers, mostly because of what his sister did to pervert his texts after his death. It seems that the only thing anyone can remember about him these days is that he said, "God is dead". This is not precisely true; the quote which really put, "God is Dead", on the map was actually from a character in his book Thus Spoke Zarathustra. It is hardly the linchpin of his philosophy, yet it is important.

To elaborate, in The Gay Science (not what you think), he goes on as follows:

God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. Yet his shadow still looms. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?—Nietzsche, The Gay Science, Section 125, tr. Walter Kaufmann

What he's saying here is not that God is actually dead, not literally. He's saying that God might as well be dead for all the attention that we pay to him. Nietzsche is saying that God has become irrelevant, not because he ceased to exist, but because people stopped caring about him, and started worshiping themselves in his place—which is a pretty Christian point of view, if you think about it.

Fundamentalists fail to see this because they are unable to understand metaphor. What most people don't know is that Nietzsche was a biblical scholar that could write circles around most who profess to know the Bible. Nietzsche was not a nihilist; he saw it as a problem to be overcome. Nihilists care about nothing. People who care about nothing don't write books full of the ideas that they care about so much that it drives them to madness.

It's too bad no one reads the classics. I blame the current state of our education system and it's focus on producing hospital billing specialists, and other such sycophants, rather than concentrating on academics such as philosophy (including natural philosophy, also known as science) and mathematics. But that's a whole other rant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well it appears that I have been schooled. Guess I have some homework to do. Thanks for taking the time to post that. Seriously.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
 
Anyone heard of Wayne Dyer? His work has greatly influenced my approach on life. It's a wonderful feeling to reconnect to spirituality without having to subscribe to the manipulations of organized religion. I cannot recommend him enough.
 
Well it appears that I have been schooled. Guess I have some homework to do. Thanks for taking the time to post that. Seriously.

Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes, well, he eats you.
 
Someone shared The Horde Needs Mithril Bars! I'm going to get right on it.

Nice!

My original thought was the following:

- Be in a group with a p2p
- p2p accepts a quest with the level requirement of 21
- You (f2p) enter a battleground
- The p2p shares the quest with you

I know that you cant equip items with higher level requirements than 20 in a bg. But my thought was if it is
possible to share and accept the higher quest.

But i asume that was already tested and doesnt work.

Cheers
Beatsteak
 
Nice!

My original thought was the following:

- Be in a group with a p2p
- p2p accepts a quest with the level requirement of 21
- You (f2p) enter a battleground
- The p2p shares the quest with you

I know that you cant equip items with higher level requirements than 20 in a bg. But my thought was if it is
possible to share and accept the higher quest.

But i asume that was already tested and doesnt work.

Cheers
Beatsteak
I don't even know how I picked it up. I assume it was in a battleground. It probably was a 24 who originally started it. I'll try sharing it, to pay it forward (god I hate that phrase).
 
Hmm. Let's pretend that I'm both the best in the world and your average jaja. Thoughts for them?

Well, as hoggers + loom shoulders gives you an easy cap they aren't needed for that.

If you are the best in the world you don't really need the reduced dodge either unless the EFC is standing against a wall, and most EFCs doesn't do that in this bracket.

If you aren't good at getting behind your target they are alot better.

Having them in your bag even if you're the best is never wrong if a good EFC appears.
 
Well, as hoggers + loom shoulders gives you an easy cap they aren't needed for that.

If you are the best in the world you don't really need the reduced dodge either unless the EFC is standing against a wall, and most EFCs doesn't do that in this bracket.

If you aren't good at getting behind your target they are alot better.

Having them in your bag even if you're the best is never wrong if a good EFC appears.

You make an excellent point about being behind your target. Naga seem to be the best option.

If you were unable to, for whatever reason, be on targets from behind, which would be the better option?

So if targets were able to dodge/parry, would foreman be definitively better?
 
You make an excellent point about being behind your target. Naga seem to be the best option.

If you were unable to, for whatever reason, be on targets from behind, which would be the better option?

So if targets were able to dodge/parry, would foreman be definitively better?

Well If you have EFC infront of you with his back against the wall you could just put em on to eliminate to option of getting dodged. If you feel like this guy is gonna start running or something after the first few hits just keep naga on.

Double maces or staff loom for a Windwalker monk?

maces for WW
gsoj for BM
mace + tome for MW
 
Does anyone know who currently owns/plays danse? I've seen him a few times the last couple days and I'm really interested if anyone knows

Fairly certain I know.

Like 99.99999 repeating % or so. :cool:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top