necroaqua
Grandfathered
We need some maths here, cause you can just keep saying "90%" till you pass out.
1) How many damaging spells do you think you would cast as a druid over the course of say a decent game of Eye of the Storm, just lighting up every target you could, etc.? Cause that is what is really going to give you your "%" of how much more effective one build is over another as far as doing the one thing they need to do... damage.
2) I can't argue that the gap for Druids and Shams is far less than Warlocks/Priests/Mages as well... the later don't have a FREE BiS dungeon set to farm... so they don't have to buy as much gear. I will stipulate that that gap is obviously less for shams/druids since they have access to the set gear... but it is still not "90%" as good.
3) Grandfathered or not, I'm sorry it costs .5-1mil, you CAN still get it. It's just your choice to not have one. I don't have one, I won't pay that much for it, that's my choice, but that slot is still not currently BiS if I have an Azora's Will jammed into it, no matter what I say about it. There are some items I just can't get... period... I would consider that not BiS as a slot choice and I would call whatever a new twink can get BiS. This is a petty argument tho and not really relevant.
1) It doesn't matter how many damaging spells you do if its a %. If each druid casts 10 spells and one does 90 damage and the other does 100 damage, its 900 and 1000 for 90%. If each druid does 10000 spells, its 900000 and 1000000 and still 90%. But the 90% isn't the important part (and its you who said it) - its the "almost as effective". Which could be a rpetty wide range.
2) Even without a dungeon set, a caster with heirlooms and dungeon blues and BG crate gear is going to be almost as effective compared to a general "BiS" twink set.
3) Agreed that its not really relevant.
It sounds like we're going back and forth and just have different opinions tho. /shrug