Neon
I like to be fat shamed
Main vibe I get from this thread: "If you go survival, you are a mid farmer".
I also play an Enhancement Shaman, why do you think I farm mid?
Main vibe I get from this thread: "If you go survival, you are a mid farmer".
my partner in crime rolled BM+Bat 5.0+ and never looked back. And he is a terrible hunter(at least he says so) but says it helps to win.
Lets think when a stun HASNT ever been useful even when its on a DR?.
All up to you but Id go BM and a bat pet.
BM's can't hand out infractionsMialu, If I report you, can you give yourself an infraction? I think you hurt my feelings worse than Lil did.
If you have a paladin/warrior with you, survival is better. BM will DR the superior stuns from warbringer and HoJ. Seeing as those are both extremely common right now, I think SV fits better. I have no idea how you find this illogical. I've already tried to let it go, but you keep pressing the issue. Neither of us are going to back down, so drop it. I'm done discussing this with you.
Because much CC is worse than little CC? That is indeed very illogical.
seems no one in this thread wants help, they just want people to agree with them. so i'm just gonna write some random crap you guys can tell me i'm wrong about...
BM only as one cc more than SV and MM
sonic blast DR's with intimidation, sting doesn't (one's range one's melee)
BM does more dps on a static target than SV. WoW Hunter Guides & Entertainment - Warcraft Hunters Union
KC cant be dodged, ES can.
ES is dispelable.
Because much CC is worse than little CC? That is indeed very illogical.
I can tell you that you're wrong about number 3. at 90, sure... 20? Not a chance. SV DPS blows BM out of the water. Your reference is completely irrelevant.
I thought I was learning a whole bunch of stuff while reading this thread, then everyone started disagreeing with each other, now I don't know what to think
I recently changed to BM, and very quickly wanted to change back to Surv.. I am too used to the play-style of Survival, and I didn't like having to replace Explosive Shot (40 yd range/25 focus) with Kill Command (pet 25 yd range/40 focus) . I would have to change from a style I enjoy, to one which I wasn't getting on with, just for this extra 1m stun.. I didn't see it was worth it.
Maybe one spec is better than the other in a number of situations, but one spec is not better in ALL situations; it comes down to preference.
I do still think i've learnt a lot from this thread, so thanks for all the constructive comments.
I recently changed to BM, and very quickly wanted to change back to Surv.. I am too used to the play-style of Survival, and I didn't like having to replace Explosive Shot (40 yd range/25 focus) with Kill Command (pet 25 yd range/40 focus) . I would have to change from a style I enjoy, to one which I wasn't getting on with, just for this extra 1m stun.. I didn't see it was worth it.