f2p guild looms

I really really REALLY need to take certain peoples advice before I get into stupid arguing matches like this :/ Not that I even get mad or really care it's just the stupid replies I have to read because I got a notification about it..

Sure kale is a F2P you're all right. Doesn't matter if you give blizz 2 thousand dollars and everything goes right to your F2P. As long as you do it on your F2P where you don't pay to play all of that money you spent just disappears and you obviously never spent a dime.

People justifying it because he is just a twink should be saying the samething about 24s. It's the samething right? getting the most out of your character..
 
Originally Posted by orebrb
Rolling in a f2p bracket on a p2p accounts using equips and enchants that the players who make the bracket thrive cannot obtain, Is looked down upon by respectable players in all brackets.
 
Might aswell call all P2P involvement illegal. Which Diplomat titled F2P gets on the chopping block first? Yeah that's right, stop spouting nonsense.

Elis actually tried to solo it. Think he made it halfway or something.
 
Might aswell call all P2P involvement illegal. Which Diplomat titled F2P gets on the chopping block first? Yeah that's right, stop spouting nonsense.

Spouting nonsense? By that definition every F2P who gets an inv is involving a P2P... There are obvious lines where what you do can effect others gameplay. People have brought up my ribbon in this thread and called me a P2P (which I'm fine with lol) then turned around and called kale with P2P enchants a F2P (which screams dumb or hypocrite). If you want to involve people who has had stuff done by p2ps into your definition you need to include people who gets invs then look at that! every F2P in the world is a P2P.

looked down upon by respectable players in all brackets.

Ahh it all makes sense now! Now I understand why so many people are in favor of this ;)
 
Spouting nonsense? By that definition every F2P who gets an inv is involving a P2P... There are obvious lines where what you do can effect others gameplay.

Inviting, getting impossible to do titles, etc are fine? But some gear isn't? How does getting help from a P2P not affect your gameplay? This is practically the same, Mind that i don't stand for the enchants though.
 
Spouting nonsense? By that definition every F2P who gets an inv is involving a P2P... There are obvious lines where what you do can effect others gameplay. People have brought up my ribbon in this thread and called me a P2P (which I'm fine with lol) then turned around and called kale with P2P enchants a F2P (which screams dumb or hypocrite). If you want to involve people who has had stuff done by p2ps into your definition you need to include people who gets invs then look at that! every F2P in the world is a P2P.



Ahh it all makes sense now! Now I understand why so many people are in favor of this ;)

Were finally making progress.
 
Inviting, getting impossible to do titles, etc are fine? But some gear isn't? How does getting help from a P2P not affect your gameplay? This is practically the same, Mind that i don't stand for the enchants though.

See you just said yourself.. Your line is the enchants. You are fine with the gear but enchants aren't ok. You also think I am a P2P because I have had quite a bit of help with stuff done by people paying. My line is the gear and I consider myself a F2P cause I didn't pay for my help. He had to personally pay for the gear and to have the option of getting the advantage. I don't like 24s for the same reason and I don't like this. Idk how a "F2P" with all P2P stuff is generally accepted yet a P2P with all P2P stuff isn't..
 
Gratz to him. This guy is a f2p he has to go up against Douchebag 24s just like every other f2p. Hating on him is jus straight up what hurts the f2p community instead of giving him props.


#F2p on F2p Crime
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top