He's now a p2p 20 that does not adhere to trial rules. Regardless of whether or not he can log the char on a whim without paying sub.
Who decide the "trial rules"? p2p = PAY to play, and obviously he isn't paying for that account - hence he is still a f2p (FREE to play).
So how exactly are these f2ps with P2P boas being called F2Ps? Kale is now a p2p 20 in my eyes. I'm all for using a bug here or there to try and get vanity stuff but when you exploit a dumb GM to get boas that clearly give you an edge more then a shirt buff you can't really be a F2P anymore.. You mine as well have subbed your f2p and went P2P 20..
Fine, so it's alright for actual p2p 20s to send all sort of items from their mains and they will be considered trial restricted twinks too.
no cause they have to pay to play their accs... srsly r ppl this stupid?
Fine, so it's alright for actual p2p 20s to send all sort of items from their mains and they will be considered trial restricted twinks too.
Meatlover @ Korgath - Community - World of Warcraft
Edit: I'm not sure why Aradiel isn't posting on TI anymore, but I have seen Kale lately (he was acting differently... maybe he sold his account?).
If a guy who is still considered a f2p twink has p2p BoAs, then it means they are obtainable and thus can be used by "trial restricted" p2ps. By your logic at least.
I don't mind him playing the char if he wants to but I find it funny considering all the QQ about queueing with 24s.
Make a toon on their realm, join a guild, type /ginvite Kale/Meatlover. There's your proof. Next time, don't be so stubborn.
Is it just a coincidence that all the characters are paladins, or is their an explanation?
I apologise if i've missed something already stating why
coincidence, i guess, i play ally so trying to get looms on an agi leather class seemed pointless to me, and i don't enjoy playing caster classes.