Anti-hunter

Not every hunter is 1200ish hp and you won't crit everytime. Plus a hunter than has a brain cell will just disengage and kite you with concussive shot. You also realise they have scattershot right?

You miss the point. I am a warrior, therefore inferior to nearly every other class due to my lack of interupt/self heals/CC (apart from a 50% snare), and yet, I can still kill a hunter now and then :) Anyone can. If you want a 'hunter-killer' go priest or make a hunter yourself (my non-Bis hunter takes down 24 scrubs and geared 20s alike). But you're better off playing a toon that you will enjoy playing (like a warrior :D)
 
... if priest is casting mind blast, hunter has at least one instant cast hit time before priest is done casting. thats what i meant.
why is the pet dead when starting? hunter can control their pets. (if priest wants to kill the pet, they have to get out of their LOS (which will allow hunter to get on priest since the pet is going back to hunter) and even if hunter's pet is dead, they can be easily rezzed using LOS

when he los's the the time it takes for the pet to make it back to him, its dead. plus if he bursts and los's he's gotta stay there tell he's focus regens, and trust me los is the last thing a hunter wants, he need to burn my mana, not let me drink
 
when he los's the the time it takes for the pet to make it back to him, its dead. plus if he bursts and los's he's gotta stay there tell he's focus regens, and trust me los is the last thing a hunter wants, he need to burn my mana, not let me drink
when you drink for mana, you think hunters cant eat for hp? LOS is the last thing hunter wants? rofl so hunter should stay out of LOS and let the priest attack correct?
 
when you drink for mana, you think hunters cant eat for hp? LOS is the last thing hunter wants? rofl so hunter should stay out of LOS and let the priest attack correct?

its the only chance the hunter's got, hes not gonna beat a priest by keep resetting the fight, unless the priest dies of bordum
 
soo.... you guys are crying out for a good hunter to 1v1 your puny priest?

/flex

taking on all challengers >:)
 
Basically the best players I know of in the bracket all say that priests wreck hunters so I'll go ahead and believe them since I dont care to put the time into playing and getting skilled at either class.
 
Ye ok, Biggie was terrible, Earl is terrible, Felix is terrible, Riotqt was terrible, Goldendays was terrible...
love how you just completely ignored what i said :)
 
I love how you're so sure of yourself when you've never even fought a good priest. With los, the hunter can reset infinite times, sure. I'll duel any hunter with or without los and win every time because my class counters theirs by mechanics. They can't do damage while staying out of my range, and they can't put out enough damage to keep me standing there healing.
 
I love how you're so sure of yourself when you've never even fought a good priest. With los, the hunter can reset infinite times, sure. I'll duel any hunter with or without los and win every time because my class counters theirs by mechanics. They can't do damage while staying out of my range, and they can't put out enough damage to keep me standing there healing.
i fought a good priest... i fought you lol :)
 
I love how you're so sure of yourself when you've never even fought a good priest. With los, the hunter can reset infinite times, sure. I'll duel any hunter with or without los and win every time because my class counters theirs by mechanics. They can't do damage while staying out of my range, and they can't put out enough damage to keep me standing there healing.

So you're claiming you are the only good priest in this bracket and you have a 100% win ratio vs lv 20 hunters 1v1?
 
I'm saying I'm the only good priest still bothering to argue with you about it. Yes, I do tend to have a 100% win ratio vs hunter 1v1.

I've played in this bracket for a long time, and in my experience, good players are far and few between. And even if you're in a wsg or ab against them, how many chances do you have to 1v1 them if they don't realize you want a duel?
 
Last edited:
I'm saying I'm the only good priest still bothering to argue with you about it. Yes, I do tend to have a 100% win ratio vs hunter 1v1.

I've played in this bracket for a long time, and in my experience, good players are far and few between. And even if you're in a wsg or ab against them, how many chances do you have to 1v1 them if they don't realize you want a duel?

ill 1v1 you veintebad :)
 
I'm saying I'm the only good priest still bothering to argue with you about it. Yes, I do tend to have a 100% win ratio vs hunter 1v1.

I've played in this bracket for a long time, and in my experience, good players are far and few between. And even if you're in a wsg or ab against them, how many chances do you have to 1v1 them if they don't realize you want a duel?

I really hope to see you soon :) If you see Lillhunter on ally, run off to some spot people aren't normally and we can 1v1. I maybe talking myself into a corner here but I stand by my statement that I can beat priests more then 50% and look forward to trying to prove it
 
If you're that willing I'm on misha :)


That's cool I'm talking in bgs? and because I normally don't roll with my agm equipped in bgs so I need to minimize dmg. My dps can normally keep up with priests healing and if they choose to do some kind of dmg against me they better be bubbled at over 90% health
popping pots doesnt void priests being an anti hunter. it means that being a hunter isnt OP enough for you without pops. And if the priest popped one too, it evens out so why even mention one they arent class mechanics
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top