Anti-hunter

Resto druid > hunter.
 
^ tenchars
 
A true hunter counter has to be able to prevent them from kiting and running away before they die. Pallies and priests can't do this so they aren't true counters. The only class that can kinda-sorta-but-not-really keep a hunter in place at level 20 is rogue, but they're far from a counter. Hunters simply have too many outs and do too much damage at this level in relation to everyone else. They're the polar opposite of warlocks in that they come into their own very early and peter out by end game.
 
A true hunter counter has to be able to prevent them from kiting and running away before they die. Pallies and priests can't do this so they aren't true counters. The only class that can kinda-sorta-but-not-really keep a hunter in place at level 20 is rogue, but they're far from a counter. Hunters simply have too many outs and do too much damage at this level in relation to everyone else. They're the polar opposite of warlocks in that they come into their own very early and peter out by end game.

I guarantee I have just as much or more burst than hunters. As a priest, hunters are not a real problem.
 
Mrcer,
I completly agree with you. I have a 20 Hunter and a 20/24 Druid can mend faster than I can lay DPS on him. This keeps me in one spot trying to out damage his healing and keeps me from effecting the game by capturing flags or posts. One of the best counters to OP DPS is OP Heals!
 
The beauty of the hunter is there is not such thing as an anti good hunter. The only thing that can beat a hunter is the player playing the hunter being dumb.
Your ignorance is incredible, the beauty of the Priest class is that it counters Hunters by mechanics, and a good priest will always​ beat a good hunter.
 
A true hunter counter has to be able to prevent them from kiting and running away before they die. Pallies and priests can't do this so they aren't true counters.
Uh can anybody else take this guy seriously? I get the pally part but you think kiting a priest means hunter will beat the priest? Disc's aren't melee like pallies champ.

EDIT: I realize now you mean that if the hunter disengages off and runs you aren't counting it as an anti-hunter, which really isnt fair. Somebody running away to where they aren't a threat is countering, imo.
 
either this guy is lost, or just really really bias because he plays a feral.
I am not bias in any class.
i play a huntard, rogue and a lock too
I recommend Feral Druid doesnt mean feral druid is the best class ever.

i recommend it because its fun
 
Lets not get into this again?
seriously, good hunters beat good priest more often than priest beating hunter.
open field = hunter wins 99.99%
LOS = 50% because hunter can use LOS too.
 
seriously, good hunters beat good priest more often than priest beating hunter.
open field = hunter wins 99.99%
LOS = 50% because hunter can use LOS too.
Wait, let me make my own random statistics to help me establish my point that I can't elaborate on.
Open field: priest wins 99%
LOS: priest wins 100%
 
Disc priests are pretty overpowered because they pretty much kill any class except pallies. Thank god they are getting nerfed in mop. Just roll a D priest to kill hunters. I hope you make them quit because it really does make this bracket a better place. KILL EM KILL EM KILL EM!!!!
 
seriously, good hunters beat good priest more often than priest beating hunter.
open field = hunter wins 99.99%
LOS = 50% because hunter can use LOS too.
A D priest will beat a hunter anytime. A mind blast, holy fire and penace combo can put a hunter to 50% health. Hunters can't heal themselves while priest can absorb hunter damage and have the best heals in the bracket. I don't know where you got your idea from. Probally because there are alot of 600hp-800hp noob priests in this bracket.
 
A D priest will beat a hunter anytime. A mind blast, holy fire and penace combo can put a hunter to 50% health. Hunters can't heal themselves while priest can absorb hunter damage and have the best heals in the bracket. I don't know where you got your idea from. Probally because there are alot of 600hp-800hp noob priests in this bracket.

I agree priests are OK 1v1 hunts but I've faced some of the better priests in the bracket and normally if we both have cds I scatter when they use penance then pop a healing potion then kite away from the scream inc, burst to keep them healing then normally my next scatter will end it if the fights still going on. Idk why everyone thinks priests wins 99% of the time or w/e cause unless they are 24 I can promise good or bad priests wont beat me 99% maybe 30ish% at best
 
I play a warrior :D Its great anti-hunter in a group, cuz usually I dont get clicked on (assuming most hunters are clickers). Charge, howl, 300 white crit, 400 BT crit, 200 HS, 150 white crit, 180 HT, dead hunter... all in about 4 GCD :D
 
I meant good as in skilled, or knowing how to play their class. Your experience is very different from mine because you have most likely never met a skilled, geared priest 1v1.
 
Then I would like to try my shot at your priest once or twice in a bg :) Love challenges or people who I can't 1v1 cause I will try all bg to get you. If we get to 1v1 whoever loses more then 50% has to admit the other one was right in this thread? Some friendly competition hehe. Won't use my agm set since you're from Ap and assuming you dont have it but health pots and standards are fine with me
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top