Several things. Rets glyph divine protection mostly, as casters are more deadly than melee.
I don't see how shield block is like DP, at all.
Dancing also isn't hard in arms, as you should be speccing stance mastery (stances are off-gcd, so it doesn't affect your damage, not that it matters if you're going defensive)
As for kiting, dispel costs 14% of your mana as ret. This means you can cast no more than seven before ooming, bump that up to around 10 with JotB regen. Freedom again is dispellable, so yes, rets are as easily kited as warriors.
but overall you will need what gear pieces I have provided. It has 36% damage reduction, and that is by no means a resilience set, not in the slightest.
In bgs: yes, people suck at interrupting. In Arena: no, they don't. At least not at ratings that matter anyway.most casters are more deadly than most melee, true. but i prefer 20% all dmg sources vs 40 for only magic. i would only use glyph for pve, or if you enter a bg and see all casters, so the rest is generalizing. in grp pvp situations you can pretty easily get other heals than fol off, especially the 300% hl after you gib someone. not that many people even bother to interrupt at this lvl, its hilarious
Pillar of Frost is on a 1 minute CD. Are you going to compare that to DP? Because that's not a smart way to do it.CD mostly. better comparison than 5min SW and DP as you were alluding to
Since when does rage being an issue matter if you're an arms warrior who's going defensive? Nothing you need to do to go defensive costs rage.yes you should have tactical mastery, and dancing isnt hard. but there are times when rage can be an issue even as arms
Given that it takes a gcd to dispel, if you're trying to nuke something when another class is spamming slows/roots on you, you're not going to catch your target, no matter how many times you dispel. You will end up ooming eventually, especially if its a rogue peeling (although at 80, you'd be dead already)i get 10 with out replen or buffs. you can do as many as you need in pvp no problem given the regen and buffs. and not every class/spec can - or even pay enough attention - to dispell, so yes, pallys are harder to kite
There's a difference between "Viable" and "BiS". Considering that you've yet to offer a set (Like i said earlier in this post), I don't see how you're contributing here at all, besides getting me riled up by picking shit apart. This is 80, not 85, rets and arms warriors need all the resilience they can get, and I've just presented a set wth 1175 resilience. It's not the most you can get as retri (whilst using all useful pieces), but it's by no means the least either. It also allows swapping to frost resist pieces without dropping the PvP 4set as well.but thats the thing...you dont need the pieces you provided. its just another set imo, saying bis infront of it is as much your assertion of a playstyle as mine to forgo so much resil. if both are viable then how is one more bis than another
Pillar of Frost is on a 1 minute CD. Are you going to compare that to DP? Because that's not a smart way to do it.
disarm, reflect, shield block all cost rage. wall doesnt, but thats about it..so idk what you mean there. n yea you have 25 if you have tact. mastery (which you should as arms pvp), but if youre starved after that or even before then yea...Since when does rage being an issue matter if you're an arms warrior who's going defensive? Nothing you need to do to go defensive costs rage.
pretty much only ones that'll spam are rogues w/crip and fdks, in which case hof. for hunters and others cleansing the snares as they come wont oom you and will allow you to catch up. but even assuming you were right that doesnt make pallys as, or more, kitable than warriors who lack both cleanse (and its removal property as ret) or hofGiven that it takes a gcd to dispel, if you're trying to nuke something when another class is spamming slows/roots on you, you're not going to catch your target, no matter how many times you dispel. You will end up ooming eventually, especially if its a rogue peeling (although at 80, you'd be dead already)
not really for pvp, which you ackowledged after you said this ("fluid"). if people do fine in pvp w/o 36% resil (which is pretty low anyways, youre still going to get gib'd by the usual suspect classes all the same, but wont have as much burst) then how is yours the definitive BiSThere's a difference between "Viable" and "BiS".
take any you want. full pve with cata gear works just fine.Considering that you've yet to offer a set (Like i said earlier in this post)
When comparing CDs, you rarely use the cooldown, it's more what it does. My example is a "case in point". Compare DP to Ams if you want, or IBF to shield wall (IBF is worse, but a longer cd, how do you place that one?), or heck, shield wall to guardian of ancient kings...oh wait.no thats not the only qualifier. and that wasnt my point even, you were the only who tried to compare DP, at a 1min CD, to shield wall - and called SW the vastly superior CD...well, duh, it should be better at 5x the cooldown (cept its not thaaaat vast even when it only lasts 2 extra sec 20% more mit. but requires extra steps ala dance + swap macro, staying w/S&B and 5xCD vs just hitting dp). to recap: i originally just said DP was a good CD. then you said DP was crap compared to SW. then i just said the 1min CDs (DP and shield block) were more comparable to eachother, as were DS and SW. i didnt say just b/c DP is a 1min CD it is suddently comparable to every 1min CD in the game.
I think kayer has to have words.disarm, reflect, shield block all cost rage. wall doesnt, but thats about it..so idk what you mean there. n yea you have 25 if you have tact. mastery (which you should as arms pvp), but if youre starved after that or even before then yea...
Hunters can spam concussion + traps, frost can spam all of their slows/novas (which again, take at least 1gcd to remove, which means they're moving faster than you,..if they haven't killed you already) and dispel, shadow can do similar, with greater effect. Rets are just as kitable as they ever were. Good warriors will get more uptime than good rets, just because of the class disparity (warriors work best with healers anyway, see dispelcleave)pretty much only ones that'll spam are rogues w/crip and fdks, in which case hof. for hunters and others cleansing the snares as they come wont oom you and will allow you to catch up. but even assuming you were right that doesnt make pallys as, or more, kitable than warriors who lack both cleanse (and its removal property as ret) or hof
Unfortunately, you have to STACK resilience til your eyes bleed to get around 50% (which is what some of the top rets do at 85), and resilience gets better the more you have. As for fluidity, sure, but keep in mind that ret gets tunneled, and needs the DR to survive. If anything, more resilience is better, not less. Getting Gibbed has nothing to do with it, you're still dying faster with less resilience, and ret doesn't get a lot of uptime anyway.not really for pvp, which you ackowledged after you said this ("fluid"). if people do fine in pvp w/o 36% resil (which is pretty low anyways, youre still going to get gib'd by the usual suspect classes all the same, but wont have as much burst) then how is yours the definitive BiS
Go ahead and do that, I'll see you in the 1500 bracket.take any you want. full pve with cata gear works just fine.
I never said that what I post is BiS. Unfortunately, the only people who challenge me go off on silly tangents about rets vs warriors. Come up with some better reason than "I've found PvE gear works fine", and I'll accept that what I posted is in fact, not BiS. Math and decent reasons are better than personal playstyle. The only time PvP gearing is even relevent is in the highest of ratings, which is exactly what my sets are for."I don't see how you're contributing here at all"
by challenging you. just because youre maintaing the list doesnt mean every chardev you put out is actually BiS. if nobody "picks ur shit apart" then whats the point, why should your every word be taken as gospel?
It certainly seems like it, as you don't drop anything, ever.&&yes im clearly just after +post....i only have the most on this site, so i just come here to troll you and get more, yup.
Usually, wearing full frost resistance is only usually worth it if you queue into double frost mage. Then, your damage becomes irrelevent, because as long as you're removing their burst damage, you will win eventually. A single frost mage isn't usually enough to warrant more than 1-2 frost resistance pieces (+ aura, naturally). You wouldn't gem pure resilience in the gear anyway, as the resistance is a substitute for resilience.ps "It also allows swapping to frost resist pieces without dropping the PvP 4set as well."
tried this, nowhere near as effective as when holy. fdk and mages still hurt you while dmg output becomes almost laughable with full pvp + the frr gear
Falkor, are you actually saying that you need Tactical Mastery as a warrior in PvP? I've read everything written by the two of you but I don't really care about the ret discussion - All I'm interested in is if you actually believe that you need Tactical Mastery to pvp as a warrior.
conccusiVe shot has a cooldown, so no technically they cant spam it. you can remove it every 5sec and for traps you can HoF. frost mages can spam, but then it also leaves them super vulnerable to your teammates, and you can always do HoF to force a spellsteal (or chuckle if they're not smart enough to). basically the same for shadow. rets may be kitable as they ever were (well maybe not ever..they havent always been able to get out of snares/roots with just cleanse iirc), but that wasnt what we were talking about...we were comparing pally to warrior. and solo, so now youre not only changing the entire argument but also tossing in healers.Hunters can spam concussion + traps, frost can spam all of their slows/novas (which again, take at least 1gcd to remove, which means they're moving faster than you,..if they haven't killed you already) and dispel, shadow can do similar, with greater effect. Rets are just as kitable as they ever were. Good warriors will get more uptime than good rets, just because of the class disparity (warriors work best with healers anyway, see dispelcleave)
oh the harsh barbs. lul was at 2,1 (ret/rdruid and alternatively hpal/feral) and going up when i took a break from playing...not that youd see me anyways due to being in some stinky eu place. but if this is your arena set maybe you should specify since all pvp is not arena, but all arena is pvp.Go ahead and do that, I'll see you in the 1500 bracket.
I never said that what I post is BiS. Unfortunately, the only people who challenge me go off on silly tangents about rets vs warriors. Come up with some better reason than "I've found PvE gear works fine", and I'll accept that what I posted is in fact, not BiS. Math and decent reasons are better than personal playstyle. The only time PvP gearing is even relevent is in the highest of ratings, which is exactly what my sets are for.
It certainly seems like it, as you don't drop anything, ever.
I'll leave kayer to answer this, I was guessing.sort of a trick question by the way you posed it. do you need it?....well idk, do you need several warrior talents? maybe, maybe not depending on which ones. however i think theres no reason to not get at least 1 pt in tact. mastery
Right, and you're totally not vulnerable to their team-mates whilst you're on gcd or anything? Forcing spellsteals isn't anything tricky, mages usually keep everything off a nuke target, at relevent ratings. As for rets being as kitable as ever, it's gotten slightly better, but not much. I don't care about the argument between rets and warriors, you brought it up, deciding to take a comment I made and run with it. Both classes require high resilience to even be competetive.conccusiVe shot has a cooldown, so no technically they cant spam it. you can remove it every 5sec and for traps you can HoF. frost mages can spam, but then it also leaves them super vulnerable to your teammates, and you can always do HoF to force a spellsteal (or chuckle if they're not smart enough to). basically the same for shadow. rets may be kitable as they ever were (well maybe not ever..they havent always been able to get out of snares/roots with just cleanse iirc), but that wasnt what we were talking about...we were comparing pally to warrior. and solo, so now youre not only changing the entire argument but also tossing in healers.
As I said, it's what matters, rather than irrelevent content. Everyone can run around bgs killing people in pvp gear. hell, it's even possible in 2s. Unfortunately 3s doesn't get queues, but that's literally only where it matters. Like the mention of how bad EU is, although we have a larger number of world first pvpers in respective classes than US does. However, it's all sticks and stones. At 80, the only PvP that matters is arena. As for rating, everyone can see mine, I don't see your char anywhere (usually is a good indicator), but you'll probably go defensive, as it's only half relevent anyway.oh the harsh barbs. lul was at 2,1 (ret/rdruid and alternatively hpal/feral) and going up when i took a break from playing...not that youd see me anyways due to being in some stinky eu place. but if this is your arena set maybe you should specify since all pvp is not arena, but all arena is pvp.
I posted it because I believe it IS. You just told me PvE gear was better, which doesn't make any sense. If you want me to be a hypocrite, you just drove me to it, sorry.you literally posted "retribution pvp BiS". dont by a hypocrite, it doesnt suit you.
youre the one who turned it into a huge tangent. all i just said rets can play just fine with far less resil and said were comprable to warriors but can also get away with a bit less due to CDs such as DP. then you got all riled up, so i had to answer back.
math and decent reasons? you havent posted a lick of math on your set, you just posted it, claimed it was bis, and added it to the Op. and your reasons are the same as mine, playstyle. you feel that 36% resil keeps you alive muuuch longer than ~0, but does it? ive used resil sets but i find them lacking in punch and keeping me alive no longer than being without, thats my decent reason. ill leave the mathmatics up to you
I'm not retarded. I mentioned the 1500 bracket because it was irrelevent pvp content. Sure, it may have been directed at you, but forgive me for it, when you posted literally zero experience (and yet, you have the same ratings as me, with comps that suit the class/spec better)you keep responding.....!
im not just gonna stop posting, especially when you actually try to goad me into it with ur "cy@1500m8" and the like. i like posting and engaging in conversations, esp with you b/c meaningful things usually come of it. so why would i just stop?
Right, and you're totally not vulnerable to their team-mates whilst you're on gcd or anything?
Forcing spellsteals isn't anything tricky, mages usually keep everything off a nuke target, at relevent ratings.
As for rets being as kitable as ever, it's gotten slightly better, but not much. I don't care about the argument between rets and warriors, you brought it up, deciding to take a comment I made and run with it. Both classes require high resilience to even be competetive.
As I said, it's what matters, rather than irrelevent content. Everyone can run around bgs killing people in pvp gear. hell, it's even possible in 2s. Unfortunately 3s doesn't get queues, but that's literally only where it matters.
1) you made fun of me for 1,5 lol butLike the mention of how bad EU is, although we have a larger number of world first pvpers in respective classes than US does. However, it's all sticks and stones. At 80, the only PvP that matters is arena. As for rating, everyone can see mine, I don't see your char anywhere (usually is a good indicator), but you'll probably go defensive, as it's only half relevent anyway.
oh you believe it is. that sounds like math and reason, not just personal opinion. hypocriteI posted it because I believe it IS. You just told me PvE gear was better, which doesn't make any sense. If you want me to be a hypocrite, you just drove me to it, sorry.
stop being such a fucking cry baby bitch. first off you are in charge of the thread, not the one in charge of creating every chardev. so dont act like they're the same thing...you can still maintain the thread and quit making chardevs, if thats what you want. and FFS, the one time i say something its "you never believe they are BiS"...SHUT UP. christs sake. you said its bis, i disagree. you bitch. i bitch. you dont do math, you ask i do math. i refuse. so if youre not going to definitively prove its bis (arena at least) just keep it, i was just making a pointed comment, i didnt mean to twist your panties into such a bunch.Fine. If you want it that way, so be it. This thread stops here. I CBA to even spend my time making BiS sets because you never believe they are BiS (as you prefer to play differently, which is _half_ of what I'm saying is irrelevent).
0 healing, with 36% resil youll still get 2 shot by the same stuff ill get 2 shot by, which with my math means you dont live 36% longer. which means no permanent last stant (or then some)36% resilience will keep you alive 36% longer with 0 healing. That's essentially like having a permanent last stand (and then some).
i dont even have bis pve gear and i still prefer pve gear. so take the bis lk+cata pve gear from here and use that for ur math....i said that awhile ago, so dont act hard now. show that with ur resil you actually live some marginal amount of time more, while doing less damage, and i might be inclined to believe youi said pick ur set.
lol all pvp content at this lvl is irrelevent, so you could have said 2,8k if that was your intention. obviously it was directed at me. ill forgive you, but that didnt stop me from posting then, or now. and i didnt know someone had to post their 3k arena armorys before disagreeing before with anyone, but i guess i know that for the futureI'm not retarded. I mentioned the 1500 bracket because it was irrelevent pvp content. Sure, it may have been directed at you, but forgive me for it, when you posted literally zero experience (and yet, you have the same ratings as me, with comps that suit the class/spec better)
Have 2 seperate Ret profiles, problem solved.
Moving along now.
sort of a trick question by the way you posed it. do you need it?....well idk, do you need several warrior talents? maybe, maybe not depending on which ones. however i think theres no reason to not get at least 1 pt in tact. mastery
Well, what would you drop for it? I'd like to see your suggestion of a spec to fit in with 1/2 Tact mastery while keeping everything else somewhat considered needed.
Talent Calculator - World of Warcraft - This is what I would personally go with, which leaves no room nor need for tactical mastery. If you dislike imp slam you can shift those talents into 1/2 blitz and 1/2 Drums of War.
Besides that, the only things you would really go into defensive stance for is Intervene and Disarm, which you'll be able to afford without any issues without any points in Tactical mastery, because of this the other filler talents simply hold too much value compared to tactical mastery, that's what I mean.