I'll skip past your opinion on what is balanced because it's completely worthless and move on to this.
Says the guy who doesn't know the first thing about the current bracket.
Mongro said:
'I played a few times almost a year ago and the bracket certainly hasn't changed since then.'
Right buddy.
Did you seriously call a player whom you don't know personally by his real name on a public forum while refering to him as an ignorant toolbag who constantly insults people while accusing him of the latest logical fallacy you learned about on wikipedia?
Call him by his real name? Yes, so what? Did I call him a toolbag? Yes. What else should I call him? A great guy? I am pretty sure I called him a toolbag only after the mountain of insults he's hurled at me in the last few months.
I guess you also missed the part where an argument using a logical fallacy discredits your argument or position. You would sit here and discredit me if I used a slippery slope argument simply because that's a form of logical fallacy.
But when I point out that your buddy is using a logical fallacy almost every time he posts, it's okay that he does it?
Double standard much?
Type shorter posts so that you can save enough breadcrumbs to backtrack to what stance you're attempting to take.
Or I could just join the ranks of people pointing out that you have no reason to be posting about 29 twinks. You don't play them. Obviously my stance isn't important to you anyway.
It's bizarre. I'm not sure if he knows that ad-hominem attacks can be relevant to the discussion. He must not have gotten to the second sentence off of Wikipedia.
ROFL, just ROFL. The college boy doesn't understand why an ad hominem is a LOGICAL FALLACY. Basis in truth or not, relevant to an argument or not, an ad hominem is an improper way to form an argument.
I think there are much more positive ways to improve the bracket rather than treating people negatively, and saying that I am a mediocre player because I don't set a focus frame is an ad hominem. It's a logical fallacy because you're choosing to attack my character than propose any sort of logical counter argument.
Good for you on failing Debate 101. Points deducted from you for completely avoiding any relevant discussion.
Don't worry, he will edit the page and convince himself that the line was placed there by a troll named Ad Homiem that like doesn't even have perspective.
I'm not editing anything. Since you've graduated from trying to have a discussion to personal attacks, you should be careful of trying to sell those straw men door to door. Some people answer with torch in hand, and I don't think your lively hood will last very long if you piss someone off.
