Should we have Moderators/CoC on this site?

Should we have Moderators/CoC on this site?


  • Total voters
    88
Yes, we should have moderators/CoC on this site. It makes the site look and feel more professional.
 
I'm going to have fun with this for a little while

ban-button-smiley-emoticon.gif


2509044-1655956166-sneak.jpg


edit: I'm going to quote myself from the previous thread. A reply you have yet to assemble a snarky reply for. Seems you're a pretty selective arguer.

Some things you just don't need accountability. Yes, they are entirely subjective. But having experience from other forums and communities, and seeing how close and positive they are to each other, I think that's enough to consider. How about you just go on and use the site for what it's meant for, and respect others while at it? Is it such a hard thing to do?

You can't just go to a library and get pissed at the librarian because you can't yell. There are reasons behind these things. And this reason is because it is NOT ACCEPTED HERE. We do not care to read it, and it is not tolerated. You are not being oppressed because you have the full ability to leave this site if you choose to. But until then, you will abide by the CoC, or you will be forced to check out.

If you TRULLY believe that this petty quarrel is enough for you to leave, and actually damage this website's success, then you might find yourself disappointed.

If anyone is wondering why we haven't stopped this yet, it is because we are trying to get a message across. But it's still tedious when someone keeps hitting the messenger with a car.

I feel as though OP has a short period of freedom to make himself out to be a pretentious troll in front of the community. That's his undoing.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like half the problem is censorship. Is there a way to publicize moderator actions in a graveyard forum or something? Basically if a thread/post is to be deleted, its moved/copied there first, along with a reason (presumably traced back to the CoC).


Sounds like the other half is people not agreeing with the CoC. You'll probably find a lot more support in picking key points of the CoC you disagree with or think are oppressive and making a thread like this to get the community opinion and support on updating that point. Trying to get rid of the CoC altogether is a lost cause - even if thats what you really want. You'll have to come to some sort of compromise from the users and mods - because they too visit and contribute to the site. If you don't want the mod's views forced on you, why are you trying to force your views on everyone else? Meet in the middle in a reasonable manner or exercise your right of exit and don't visit/contribute to the site. Hell, you could even start your own competing site if you really think that so many people have left due to overmoderation.
 
I'm going to have fun with this for a little while

ban-button-smiley-emoticon.gif


2509044-1655956166-sneak.jpg


edit: I'm going to quote myself from the previous thread. A reply you have yet to assemble a snarky reply for. Seems you're a pretty selective arguer.



If anyone is wondering why we haven't stopped this yet, it is because we are trying to get a message across. But it's still tedious when someone keeps hitting the messenger with a car.

I feel as though OP has a short period of freedom to make himself out to be a pretentious troll in front of the community. That's his undoing.

O I'm a troll now? I just made all this shit up just to troll people even though this general message has been discussed various times on this website. As per usual you say the same ''you're wrong we are right'' argument. You have made your mind up for my replies before even hearing them. Already assuming them to be ''snarky''. I guess I'll do what you're doing since you are very mature. I'll just wait for your ''idiotic'' reply then.

Your argument is exactly the same but re worded differently. I'm not going to bother. Read my previous answers.
 
O I'm a troll now? I just made all this shit up just to troll people even though this general message has been discussed various times on this website. As per usual you say the same ''you're wrong we are right'' argument. You have made your mind up for my replies before even hearing them. Already assuming them to be ''snarky''. I guess I'll do what you're doing since you are very mature. I'll just wait for your ''idiotic'' reply then.

Your argument is exactly the same but re worded differently. I'm not going to bother. Read my previous answers.

I think you want to remove mods to bring in a new reign of terror upon the citizens of TI.
 
Hey man i'm a libertarian who leans heavily towards minimal state involvement, this doesn't rusttle my jimmies. Here is the only part of the CoC that is regularly enforced, if anyone wants to read it before they vote, and please do vote - I would appreciate it.

Hostile and/or Toxic Behavior:

These forums are intended to be an open and welcoming place for all users, and as such, members contributing to a hostile or toxic environment will not be tolerated. The behaviors that fall into this category include, but are not limited to:
  • Maliciously insulting another member for any reason.
  • Profanity or vulgarity used in any non-benign manner.
  • Hate speech of any form, including but not limited to race, gender, religion, orientation, nationality, socioeconomic status, or disability.
  • Harassment of an individual or group with the intent to bait, troll, infuriate, intimidate, or humiliate.
Posting Prohibited Material:

Discussion, instructions, or external links to information about the following topics is expressly forbidden:
  • Exploiting, hacking, or defrauding Blizzard/Activision or its games.
  • Cyber-attacking any website, online service, or individual.
  • Any public discussion or argument concerning disciplinary actions taken by the TwinkInfo staff.
Creating Multiple Accounts:

Every person is limited to only one Twink Info account. The creation of any additional account is a Ban Worthy Offense for the primary account, and a permanent ban for the additional account.

Posting Graphic Material:

Any signature, post, thread, or profile that contains depictions or descriptions of the following items will be removed and the account that posted said content will be permanently banned:
  • Nudity or sexually explicit acts.
  • Drugs or alcohol.
  • Graphic violence.
Spamming:

Any signature, post, thread or profile that contains advertisement and/or spam will be removed and the account that posted said content will be permanently banned.

False Claim Of Death:

Any signature, post, thread or profile that falsely claims the death of another community member will be removed and the owner of the account will receive a permanent ban.

Scamming:

Any user participating in the carrying out of a scam will be permanently banned. A scam is defined by TwinkInfo as any occurrence in which one party fails to abide by the original transaction terms that were agreed upon by both parties, or fulfill a refund or an alternate resolution agreed upon by both parties, within 48 hours of the agreed upon time of the original transaction. TwinkInfo reserves the right to withdraw at any time from any mediation between parties in a legal dispute, and offers no legal advice nor takes any legal responsibility for transactions carried out between individuals through the site.

You can find the full version here Code of Conduct V3

Sorry but I am laughing my ass of if you say ALL of these things is reguarly enforced, again I must say you guys are blind then, when there is private server advertisement RIGHT infront of you. In the previous thread sollipist made 4-5 pages were nothing but private server advertisement and that goes under defraud I would say, wouldnt you? And no dont come tell me it havnt been reported I dont know how many times. Doubt all the editson cencorship is reports from people anyways.
 
I have very well seen that Myrm wants this site to evolve, and be accepted by Blizzard. Moderators are needed/required for this to happen. This is said by the administrator of this site, he calls the shots. Not you, not the mods no one else but him. And if he tells the mod's to do this and that, they will. And he is telling them to respect the CoC, that is what they are going to do. It's why they are there.

Now why do we need moderators, erm.
If someone is posting nonsensical bullshit, then we leave him alone like a mature person.
I do not know you Solipost, but this, man, is irrelevant. Think of this place as a forum that has 99% of the threads with an "124125saff2favsa" as their tittle and "abc" as their thread's content. I mean, come on man. Seriously ?

Another reason why we need mods is, who is going to sticky all those posts, who will be giving rank ? We all know Myrm cannot do it alone because he is busy organizing pvp events for the 19 bracket, and he deserves some respect for that, he has revived a whole community, along with Conq, Pizza and HB.

Honestly, either way or another, we all know how it is going to end, based on what we are seeing on the votes.

And, i completely agree with that Pizza said : "Yes, we should have moderators/CoC on this site. It makes the site look and feel more professional." This is definitely a good reason.
 
Moderator votes don't count. So 17 a piece.

None the less I would feel ashamed being a moderator knowing close if not 50% of the votes is against me, just shows something is totally wrong imo.

That being said, I know I do not share the entirely same point of view as you do Solipsist , because the main reason I voted no on that poll is not because of what they are doing, but how they are doing it. I think every moderator should be equally strict, share the same vision of the website and be on the same page regarding in what direction this website is going. Get me right, if this website wants to be clean from toxic / bad language and shit I think they should go all try hard on it and not try to balance on this line with what is okay and what is not okay.

I simply cant have moderators being insecure about the CoC, what they are doing, and their way of judging. It's shown thread after thread after thread. Even Conq showed that in both your threads in the past 24 hours now, how it's okay for some people to shit on the rules and for some it isn't, imo the moderators are way to biased and doing a poorly job now days. I dont know if it's because Myrm as admin has to clear the rules up for the moderators and how "strict" they have to be or if he needs more moderators in general, and tbh I dont care if this website is going to be a strict rule book or not, I can live with either. But I hate seeing a website trying to balance on whats right and wrong.

He even posted "Which rules they prioritize" over other rules, yet it feelsl ike they do nothing about em at all, which feels frustraiting as fuck as a user of the website.

I sincerely appologize if anyone got offended by this post, but that's how I see this forum.

TLDR Need more moderators and sync up on where this site is going, but untill that is done I prefer 0 moderators is better than having some shitty moderators.

Best regards Shamatix
 
Agonist just wants what is best for the community. I can see that. Unfortunately I don't think most are on his wavelength. Having Shane step down was pure luck anymore fortune seems highly unlikely. Fight the good fight.
 
Maybe TI needs to change it's meta...

2h7ql1e.jpg


On a serious note thank you Agonist for voicing your thoughts and opinions in both threads. I agree with you 100%.

*nominate Solipsist (Agonist) for MVP. I did!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
we play 19 twinks... its an immature stupid waste of time and no truly mature person would touch this shit in the first place because they have way more productive things to do with their time.

our community is built largely on immaturity... without immaturity the majority of us are bored out of our minds.

if you go around censoring all of the juicy immature fun from our forums you're going to end up with a ghost town of a forum as you can see already.


Can I just add that i think that people who think this forum needs to look professional are... fucking weird? Namely like mocha and pizza... who do you think is the audience here? You realize queues die down when school starts? We're not trying to impress walstreet here... our audience is primarily CHILDREN and kids just want to be kids. So let them come here and be kids? Why the fuck not? Kids are fun!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Can I just add that i think that people who think this forum needs to look professional are... fucking weird? Namely like mocha and pizza... who do you think is the audience here? You realize queues die down when school starts? We're not trying to impress walstreet here... our audience is primarily CHILDREN and kids just want to be kids. So let them come here and be kids? Why the fuck not? Kids are fun!

Kids might be fun, a bunch of prepubescent teens displaying their big curseword vocabulary are not so fun. I am all for free speach and no censorship, but if all people do with their time is writing curse words and attacking other people on the forum or just try to provoke other members, I see nothing wrong with punishing such actions.
 
Those people that voted "no" have no idea what they were voting no on. [MENTION=9433]Solipsist[/MENTION]
You would have it be okay for someone post your SNN, your address, pictures of your Mother, your family, gay porn, your IP, your drivers license( presuming you have one), links to hate groups, links on how to make bombs, etc...?
Without moderators ANYTHING can be posted. ANYTHING... There is nothing or no one to tell you what you can and can't post. Total anarchy... Think Civilization without government or police.
 
Those people that voted "no" have no idea what they were voting no on. [MENTION=9433]Solipsist[/MENTION]
You would have it be okay for someone post your SNN, your address, pictures of your Mother, your family, gay porn, your IP, your drivers license( presuming you have one), links to hate groups, links on how to make bombs, etc...?
Without moderators ANYTHING can be posted. ANYTHING... There is nothing or no one to tell you what you can and can't post. Total anarchy... Think Civilization without government or police.

decent
 
Those people that voted "no" have no idea what they were voting no on. Solipsist
You would have it be okay for someone post your SNN, your address, pictures of your Mother, your family, gay porn, your IP, your drivers license( presuming you have one), links to hate groups, links on how to make bombs, etc...?
Without moderators ANYTHING can be posted. ANYTHING... There is nothing or no one to tell you what you can and can't post. Total anarchy... Think Civilization without government or police.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The only time we should need moderators is when someone is leaking someones personal information, scamming etc
You should never be allowed to censor anyone unless it is a breach of extremes like personal info or scamming.

Do you have fucking down syndrome?
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------



Do you have fucking down syndrome?

You asked No or Yes...
I explained to the people that stated no...
You can't have it both ways youngling. You only want moderators when it suits your needs.

Hmm, so now you are making fun of people with a mental disability. For shame. That is definitely a breach of CoC. Two as a matter of fact.
You are an angry little man aren't you?
Have a wonderful day Sunshine!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top