Separate f2p/veteran forums discussion

Advantages for people only interested in F2P things:

  • Have one place that efficiently displays threads relevant to the account type and its limitations.
  • Regardless of actual F2P or restricted because of interest in playing with restriction.
  • Which the current tag system is unable to do because I cannot select: hey vBulletin old buddy old pal please display [Starter] and [All] and also untagged threads if poster didn't bother, if it's relevant to F2P and also [US] and [EU] if that was important to the one posting the thread, k? Yay thanks.
  • Have one place where F2P limits and events can be discussed and the threads aren't bumped into oblivion. I'm glad to see the many fun things veterans are discovering now, it truly is great. :) But it naturally produces content much quicker than F2P where things are tried and tested.
  • If planned events stay on the first page this gives the people interested in the challenge a chance to see them. There's enough old characters around, people could reactivate them if they're interested.

I'm not sure why you chose to bullet this out the way you did, because this is essentially only one point: Being able to find F2P-specific threads without them being lost off the front page due to there being so many more threads that are bracket-wide or Veteran-specific. Mind you, I think this is a legitimate claim, and I believe it's the same point that [MENTION=13519]Activate[/MENTION] made with his response, but it is in fact just one bullet point, even though it's been written to make it look like multiple points.

And let me go on record here to say that I agree with this point, I've always agreed with this point. I'm still an F2P myself, and this concern you express--that F2P-specific content would be lost among the Vet and bracket-wide content, is exactly why I personally petitioned Shane to include an F2P-specific sub-forum. And I've already explained (and Broken confirmed) the push-back that we got because of that decision. I'm not saying that the push-back would necessarily be the same now, as perhaps the F2P community as a whole now realizes the importance of having F2P-specific content in its own place and would value that now more highly than the inclusive/exclusive concerns they expressed before.

Incidentally, I also, during the last time we hashed this out, suggested that there be a master forum for the bracket and then sub-forums for each account type. In fact I think if I recall correctly, it was even included in one of the polls just to see what people thought of it, and no one really went for it. And Shane didn't like the idea because he felt it would be very chaotic and cluttered and hard to manage.
 
[/LIST]

I'm not sure why you chose to bullet this out the way you did, because this is essentially only one point: Being able to find F2P-specific threads without them being lost off the front page due to there being so many more threads that are bracket-wide or Veteran-specific. Mind you, I think this is a legitimate claim, and I believe it's the same point that [MENTION=13519]Activate[/MENTION] made with his response, but it is in fact just one bullet point, even though it's been written to make it look like multiple points.

And let me go on record here to say that I agree with this point, I've always agreed with this point. I'm still an F2P myself, and this concern you express--that F2P-specific content would be lost among the Vet and bracket-wide content, is exactly why I personally petitioned Shane to include an F2P-specific sub-forum. And I've already explained (and Broken confirmed) the push-back that we got because of that decision. I'm not saying that the push-back would necessarily be the same now, as perhaps the F2P community as a whole now realizes the importance of having F2P-specific content in its own place and would value that now more highly than the inclusive/exclusive concerns they expressed before.

Incidentally, I also, during the last time we hashed this out, suggested that there be a master forum for the bracket and then sub-forums for each account type. In fact I think if I recall correctly, it was even included in one of the polls just to see what people thought of it, and no one really went for it. And Shane didn't like the idea because he felt it would be very chaotic and cluttered and hard to manage.

The reason so many important items get regulated to second page news is two-fold.
One, it is just that. It is not popular enough to stay on the first page.
And two, half of the front page is filled with stickies. Are all of those really needed? Can some of them be relocated? A pop open just for stickies? Something...
We are bound to get more stickies in the future. Soon the whole front page will be stickies. Kek...

Sweetsidney
 
We separated the bracket, people complained anyway.

The bulk of the content in the Twenty Twinking forum pertains to both Veterans and to F2Ps. All of the old threads from years past are not going to be moved into a new F2P-only forum. That would not be fair to the majority of the Twenty Twinking community who do not exclusively play F2P. If you guys want to pitch an argument for having your own place to be able to read your own F2P-exclusive threads without having to sort through the majority of stuff that applies to the whole bracket, you can do so, but don't get greedy and try to steal away years' worth of threads that are not solely of interest to F2Ps. Don't try to have your cake and eat it too.
Good grief man
 
And two, half of the front page is filled with stickies. Are all of those really needed? Can some of them be relocated? A pop open just for stickies? Something...

This is certainly an issue that needs addressing. This is the sort of thing that I'm hoping the new Bracket Managers can look into and make recommendations to the staff on what they would like to see stickied, unstickied, updated, and so forth, once they're chosen. I wouldn't say that that change alone will address the concerns being expressed of pertinent information being lost to the second page.
 
Isn't nearly every thread prior to the introduction to vet solely f2p information as it was the f2p forum then? F2ps want their own sub forum for two things, better organization (~35% of the reason) and to gain back f2p identity / community (~65%) because of course its much easier to join a specific group (f2p) when they have their own area, rather then mixed in with another group as well. Part of the great amazing attractions to f2p are actually the part memories already held, those memories are shown and enjoyed in those previous threads. If we are gonna get cake, I'm going to fucking eat it, i think most ppl agree with that
 
I agree with the F2P subforum being created, i'm sure it's difficult for F2P's to come through TI and try to find the information they need within the overwhelming amount of info exclusively relevant to vets.
 
Isn't nearly every thread prior to the introduction to vet solely f2p information as it was the f2p forum then? F2ps want their own sub forum for two things, better organization (~35% of the reason) and to gain back f2p identity / community (~65%) because of course its much easier to join a specific group (f2p) when they have their own area, rather then mixed in with another group as well. Part of the great amazing attractions to f2p are actually the part memories already held, those memories are shown and enjoyed in those previous threads. If we are gonna get cake, I'm going to fucking eat it, i think most ppl agree with that

You speak as if only the people who still play F2P have any claim to those memories. No, the only things that would be pertinent to an F2P-exclusive subforum would be threads that only have value to people who only play F2P. Examples include organization threads for F2P-exclusive events, F2P-specific achievement tracking, and lists of best F2P enchants (since they differ from Vet enchants). Anything that isn't exclusive to F2P interests, belongs in the Level Twenty Twinking section where all 20s (including F2Ps) can benefit from it.

Incidentally, this insistence on co-opting the history of the bracket is what ultimately derailed the initiative to have an F2P-exclusive forum the last time around. So each of you might want to take a moment to consider what needs are the most important to you.
 
And I sure as hell wouldn't want to be the person responsible for going through this forum's entire thread history to decide which belong in a new sub-forum.
 
And I sure as hell wouldn't want to be the person responsible for going through this forum's entire thread history to decide which belong in a new sub-forum.

This was definitely a large consideration last time around as well :)
 
This was definitely a large consideration last time around as well :)

Had it been separated in the first place this would not be a problem. Yde has pretty much summed up most of our points so far.


Potential losses incurred in case of change:


Disadvantages for people interested in both Vet and F2P:
Have to read two subforums.

Disadvantages due to same level:
Choosing where to post or keep threads that could belong to both sections, anything relevant to gear. This is the biggest disadvantage in my opinion.

Psychological Disadvantages:

Loss of sense of legitimacy and belonging in the bracket for F2P. :(
People playing Vets feeling excluded and alone. :(



Potential gains:


Advantages for people only interested in Vet things:
Have a place that showcases the many fun things veterans are discovering now. With current activity this is pretty much the status quo, so no real advantage here.

Advantages for people only interested in F2P things:

  • Have one place that efficiently displays threads relevant to the account type and its limitations.
  • Regardless of actual F2P or restricted because of interest in playing with restriction.
  • Which the current tag system is unable to do because I cannot select: hey vBulletin old buddy old pal please display [Starter] and [All] and also untagged threads if poster didn't bother, if it's relevant to F2P and also [US] and [EU] if that was important to the one posting the thread, k? Yay thanks.
  • Have one place where F2P limits and events can be discussed and the threads aren't bumped into oblivion. I'm glad to see the many fun things veterans are discovering now, it truly is great. :) But it naturally produces content much quicker than F2P where things are tried and tested.
  • If planned events stay on the first page this gives the people interested in the challenge a chance to see them. There's enough old characters around, people could reactivate them if they're interested.


Advantages for people interested in both:
Things are sorted better.

Psychological Advantages:
Regain a currently lost sense of legitimacy and belonging in the bracket for F2P. :)




Things that may make the disadvantages insignificant:


  • Make a decision on where the front page for 20 twinking is. This will probably be Vet / full enchanted P2P. Put / Leave the important threads on gear there. Other sections can duplicate or link to them easily.
  • Put other stuff from the time where there were no Vets into F2P section. If it gets bumped, like parkour, anyone can post in it, since it was a community thing and there's no level requirement at all. If someone rightly thinks it's awesome and wants it in the Vet / 19s / 70s section, they can link it there.
  • This is a forum. It's like a box of folders in your office, you can stuff everything into one folder because you think it's all interesting to you, but your accountant who's only interested in part of it may be annoyed, or you can sort your stuff into different folders. Maybe you end up deciding you'd prefer not to do that because you don't like folders, and that is fine too. Either way you can read everything in the box. Everyone can read and post everywhere in this forum if the topic interests them and no-one should ever feel sad and alone. :)
 
Had it been separated in the first place this would not be a problem. Yde has pretty much summed up most of our points so far.

No, you're not understanding the full situation. No matter when the two communities had been separated, if they had been separated there would have been a need to decide, by some means, which threads got moved over to the F2P-only forum. In fact when the F2P-only forum was created, I asked the community to let me know which threads they wanted moved from the general whole-bracket forum into the F2P-exclusive forum, and that's basically when all Hell broke loose, precisely because it is so difficult for a group of people to decide what to do when some people want one thing and other people want another thing.

Honestly, you really shouldn't just say things like "this wouldn't have been a problem" when you don't have any basis for knowing what a problem it actually was. If this idea goes through and F2Ps get their own place for their F2P-exclusive discussion, then we will be in exactly, precisely the same situation that we were when I already tried this exact, precise same solution last year. The only thing that might make it different this time, and the reason why this idea is being considered, is because as time has passed, it may be possible that the F2P community has a different perspective and has different needs, and would be able to establish such a resource without summarily rejecting it and accusing the staff of trying to marginalize them and stuff them in a corner.

You have to try to appreciate my perspective here. Last year I gave F2Ps their own forum, and they rejected it because they thought it represented a diminution and marginalization of that community. And now a year later, a few F2Ps are saying they feel marginalized and diminished in the current arrangement, and are demanding the very same thing that they were given a year ago, which at that time they rejected, for the very same reasons that they're giving now for why they need it. Surely someone here can see the irony in that.

At this point right now, if we were to put it to a vote, and the number of people who self-identify as F2P who wanted a separation outnumbered the number of people who self-identify as F2P who didn't want to be separated, then that would be a reflection of a change in the collective will of the community. It was Yde who pointed out to me in a PM that even if the F2P community felt that it needed one thing a year ago, it could now feel that it needed something else, even if that thing is the very same thing that it once violently rejected. It's not up to me, because in matters of deciding the future of the F2P community I'm just one voice, albeit a voice who has the ability to make things happen. But don't claim that the very difficult process of implementing such a change would have been any easier if it had been accepted by the community and implemented fully the last time around, because that's just not true. And believing in that idea is going to blind you to the reality of the actual work it's going to take to establish a separate-yet-equal F2P community in a new forum.

As a bit of a history lesson for those whose join dates were after approximately early 2012: before there was even an F2P forum, there was just the 20-24 forum. Twinking at 24 was absolutely unheard of before Trial accounts became non-expiring in mid-2011, so very quickly the content of the 20-24 forum was filled with I would say 95-98% content (guides, threads, etc) written by and for F2Ps. The staff at that time finally capitulated and gave F2Ps their own forum, so that we could escape from the growing corruption of level 24 players who were moving into the bracket (and forum) and trying to cause us as much grief as possible (the same thing that several of you have said you feel the 29s, and to a lesser extent the Veterans, are doing now). But when the staff gave F2Ps the new forum, all of the content--ALL of it--remained in the old 20-24 forum. I was very vocal back then about how I didn't think that was fair, because in that case it was absolutely clear that that content, which we lost, applied exclusively to F2Ps. Despite that fact, though, no content was ever moved, and F2Ps had to start over from nothing.

But as every user in this bracket knows, we persevered from that setback, we rolled up our sleeves, and we built a community anew. The same community that every one of you joined, for all the reasons that the F2P pioneers back then laid down as far as the community we were trying to build. And here today, you're faced with a similar situation, only this time the content that has been built since then does still apply to Veterans and P2P 20s. We had a completely legitimate claim to all the content back in 2012, and we didn't get it, and we accepted that and we built something great anyway. The claim to the old content now is much less legitimate, because it still applies to, and was built by, the people who now play Veterans, and I have every confidence that if you brave few who want your own forum have the same mettle that we did back then, you'll be able to start with a new forum of your own like we did, and build whatever you want to out of it.

The only threads that would be moved to an F2P-only forum, would be threads that only apply to F2Ps. That statement should be obvious on its face, but, here we are.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There seems to be a lot of controversy
[MENTION=8138]Kincaide[/MENTION] I thought you locked this thread, lol did myrm make you open it back up?

im just not understanding we already voted on this, wont the popular vote be the same?
 
The only threads that would be moved to an F2P-only forum, would be threads that only apply to F2Ps. That statement should be obvious on its face, but, here we are.

Ok I am slowly getting all the info and putting it together. I thought It was Vets moving out of the F2P section rather than a new section for F2P only. If it was don't this way a lot less threads would be moved. This section was previously F2P specific so I see little need to move f2ps rather than vets. Now if the offer for a entirely new forum was taken up I could see the work load but I would expect the Stickied threads to be copied or transferred. Many threads have been duplicated due to the size like the Q&A and screen shot threads so I don't think that would be a problem. Im basically thinking this section that's basically the F2P twinking section would just be cleansed or have files copied over for vets.
 
There seems to be a lot of controversy
[MENTION=8138]Kincaide[/MENTION] I thought you locked this thread, lol did myrm make you open it back up?

im just not understanding we already voted on this, wont the popular vote be the same?

Well, This is a debate/vote you could say that involves the people of this bracket rather than multiple TI brackets but mainly its addressing the F2P point of View but Yde sums it up best already so.
 
There seems to be a lot of controversy
Kincaide I thought you locked this thread, lol did myrm make you open it back up?

im just not understanding we already voted on this, wont the popular vote be the same?

No and no. Myrm has been basically absent from the site since he bought it. I presume that he is working on things in the background, trying to get the coding for some site-wide changes he's implementing such as a streaming section. No one makes me do anything: I'm a senior moderator and the most experienced with this particular community. I am also, however, well known to be willing to change my mind when presented with reasonable arguments, and in this case, as I said, Yde pointed out to me in a PM that now that time has passed and population numbers and needs have changed, it's possible that the community, which beat this horse into the ground a year ago, might need to re-examine whether the arrangement is still meeting the community's (communities'?) needs. My initial resistance to consideration of this idea was based on knowing how the whole community thrashed about and tore at their clothing over this issue a year ago, and after all the work that had been done, I felt that the overwhelming majority of the community felt that this was an issue they didn't want to have to go through again. And certainly some replies in this thread reflect that opinion. But Yde pointed out that needs may have changed as the player base has changed, and I came to accept her point of view. And that is also the reason why the vote may not be the same. If I were still convinced that the vote would be the same, then I would still be saying this conversation doesn't need to be happening again. But Yde pointed out valid reasons why--not because of a few posters, but because of large-scale shifts in power and population in-game--the needs of the community might need to be readdressed.

It's still entirely possible that the vast majority of F2Ps don't want to be alienated and psychologically separated from the rest of the Twenties community. But I don't know. And if I don't know, then that means the discussion of the issue has merit.
 
I want to thank everyone for presenting the information and debates they have given as both sides have had some solid points. Big ups to Kincaide for really digging into the history too. Yde for organizing the arguments as well. I fill the only thing now is to wait to see what the decision is. I do feel this thread is basically complete even though it hasn't turned into a rambling thread or offtopic thread just a few more points have been added or expressed further which I think was one of the reasons it was reopened. I think Myrm is busy with the Twink Cup just as HB and Conq hope that goes well btw the arenas looked great.
 
I thought It was Vets moving out of the F2P section rather than a new section for F2P only.

Oh, no no no. We might be willing to let the F2Ps vote on whether the F2Ps want their own F2P-exclusive section, but we're certainly not going to let the F2Ps decide whether the Veterans are going to be kicked out of the community. You're kidding, right? There's nobody who could rationally claim that that would be fair.

No, as I've said, the vast majority of content in this section was created by, and still applies to, every person playing at level 20. If the F2Ps want their own section so that F2P-exclusive content can be easily found and not bounced off the first page by bracket-wide conversations, then we can look into that, but it would be just that... content that ONLY applies to F2Ps.
 
Oh, no no no. We might be willing to let the F2Ps vote on whether the F2Ps want their own F2P-exclusive section, but we're certainly not going to let the F2Ps decide whether the Veterans are going to be kicked out of the community. You're kidding, right? There's nobody who could rationally claim that that would be fair.

No, as I've said, the vast majority of content in this section was created by, and still applies to, every person playing at level 20. If the F2Ps want their own section so that F2P-exclusive content can be easily found and not bounced off the first page by bracket-wide conversations, then we can look into that, but it would be just that... content that ONLY applies to F2Ps.

Ah ok thanks for clearing that up for me. I have been busy with other things so I sometimes only get a glance at pages created while im away. I understand what you mean. I wasn't necessarily saying Vets kicked out community I was trying to figure out the sorting methods but you have just stated that you would basically pick out the threads for both Vet and F2P right?

I see it as F2P section was F2P only for most of its existence(Not 20 but F2P themed rather than enchants and other things Appling to all level 20s).Vets have only been apart of it for a short time so I thought it would be easy to pick out things that apply to vets and put in their forum and this forum would return to its original F2P section state of being.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No and no. Myrm has been basically absent from the site since he bought it. I presume that he is working on things in the background, trying to get the coding for some site-wide changes he's implementing such as a streaming section. No one makes me do anything: I'm a senior moderator and the most experienced with this particular community. I am also, however, well known to be willing to change my mind when presented with reasonable arguments, and in this case, as I said, Yde pointed out to me in a PM that now that time has passed and population numbers and needs have changed, it's possible that the community, which beat this horse into the ground a year ago, might need to re-examine whether the arrangement is still meeting the community's (communities'?) needs. My initial resistance to consideration of this idea was based on knowing how the whole community thrashed about and tore at their clothing over this issue a year ago, and after all the work that had been done, I felt that the overwhelming majority of the community felt that this was an issue they didn't want to have to go through again. And certainly some replies in this thread reflect that opinion. But Yde pointed out that needs may have changed as the player base has changed, and I came to accept her point of view. And that is also the reason why the vote may not be the same. If I were still convinced that the vote would be the same, then I would still be saying this conversation doesn't need to be happening again. But Yde pointed out valid reasons why--not because of a few posters, but because of large-scale shifts in power and population in-game--the needs of the community might need to be readdressed.

It's still entirely possible that the vast majority of F2Ps don't want to be alienated and psychologically separated from the rest of the Twenties community. But I don't know. And if I don't know, then that means the discussion of the issue has merit.

cant we just end discussions and make polls lol?
 
cant we just end discussions and make polls lol?

This thread should do the job for deciding what happens pretty well. No need to take extra unassay steps so late in the process. Plus this is not totally dictated by number of people by itself there is many other points this decision will be made with. This is simply a Vet argument vs F2P argument with the added mod perspective mixed to it so far.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top