Is it somehow hard to understand that different political parties have different ways of pursuing a perfect society? Vänsterpartiet, like you mentioned, have their reasons. For instance, they think grades pressure the studens and affect their results negatively. Thus, they learn less, and our future society will be lead by less intelligent people. That's their theory. If you don't understand it, you would obviously not make a good politician. Try to argue against democracy by saying you don't understand the concept of it. "Democracy doesn't make sense to me. That's why it's wrong." Are you actually serious? VP presented their goals with well thought out arguments, probably based on statistics. The liberal parties try to counter this argument with their own.
Boehner would understand that Hitler thought the way he did. He would probably not agree with it, but he would understand the argument and argue against it in political debates. Boehner wouldn't want Hitler's wishes to come true, and thus he would try to get the people with him. How? By presenting them with facts enough to realise that Boehner's way of reaching an Utopia is better than a holocaust.
You should read up on German history. Hitler and his men got their power in 1933 and got rid of all the opposition. They didn't allow any other parties. They didn't even get their power democratically, the highest amount of votes they got was 37%. They started a persecution of the socialists and communists and made a deal with the ruling bourgeoisie to get rid of the communistic and socialistic parties from the parliament. Thus, they could limit the attention the left-wing politicians would get.
History class over.
I'll say it again. Just because you understand an argument doesn't necessarily mean you agree with it.
un·der·stand - To perceive and comprehend the nature and significance of; grasp.
Since we should be done derailing by now, why won't you send me a message on skype or PM me here on twinkinfo if there's any follow-up questions.
