No you cant. I literally just posted alliance having more hunters than horde in 100% of games just 2 pages of bullshit ago.I can assure you that its true,in eu at least,horse have full twink hunt team and alliance barely have 1 twink hunt in teams.
No you cant. I literally just posted alliance having more hunters than horde in 100% of games just 2 pages of bullshit ago.I can assure you that its true,in eu at least,horse have full twink hunt team and alliance barely have 1 twink hunt in teams.
Well im in bgs with my alliance mage for 5 months now and in 90% of the games horde have all the hunter twinks so yea i canNo you cant. I literally just posted alliance having more hunters than horde in 100% of games just 2 pages of bullshit ago.
So you havent played much, thats okey.Well im in bgs with my alliance mage for 5 months now and in 90% of the games horde have all the hunter twinks so yea i can![]()
No you cant. I literally just posted alliance having more hunters than horde in 100% of games just 2 pages of bullshit ago.
Ok im guessing you are just a troll so have a nice day knowing horde have all the hunter twinks.Cheers mateSo you havent played much, thats okey.
You need to look at your own team too because its greener than a nature reserve.
nice sample size
Because I dont believe you when you say something opposing my own point and contradicting the evidence Ive brought to support my claim? Shocking. What did you expect to happend? I was gonna go oh this guy clearly knows whats up and bow to your opinion? But no call me a troll and walk away, its certainly easier than arguing a case youre losing.Ok im guessing you are just a troll so have a nice day knowing horde have all the hunter twinks.Cheers mate
Always funny seeing trolls go ham hahahaIll do more for you later if its needed but why keep doing the same expecting a different result.
So how many games in a row do alliance need to have more hunters for you to admit defeat? Or do you want a tally of all hunters and how many in each game and compare %s. What does it take for Conzil to surrender a lost cause?
Because I dont believe you when you say something opposing my own point and contradicting the evidence Ive brought to support my claim? Shocking. What did you expect to happend? I was gonna go oh this guy clearly knows whats up and bow to your opinion? But no call me a troll and walk away, its certainly easier than arguing a case youre losing.
If someone in science field were to make a theory based on experiment consisting of 2 tests and called it enough just because something happened 2 times in a row he would be most likely pushed to suicide by other scientists. How is this a proof? If I go to a random SL raid right now and somehow in both of them an arcane mage is top dps would that mean that arcane mage is all time top dmg? No, but you know what would prove who's top dps in SL raids? Checking logs from other raids, see rankings, in other words taking as many instances into account as possible. So I believe that someone who is constantly playing bgs in EU and seeing bracket all day every day has just "slightly" more chance of being right about that topicNo you cant. I literally just posted alliance having more hunters than horde in 100% of games just 2 pages of bullshit ago.
If someone in science field were to make a theory based on experiment consisting of 2 tests and called it enough just because something happened 2 times in a row he would be most likely pushed to suicide by other scientists. How is this a proof? If I go to a random SL raid right now and somehow in both of them an arcane mage is top dps would that mean that arcane mage is all time top dmg? No, but you know what would prove who's top dps in SL raids? Checking logs from other raids, see rankings, in other words taking as many instances into account as possible. So I believe that someone who is constantly playing bgs in EU and seeing bracket all day every day has just "slightly" more chance of being right about that topic
You and your fucking qualifiers. Yes those are twinks? How many sockets does a hunter need to be a twink in your eyes? Wheres the line. God Im so sick of your retard antics lol.View attachment 20310
View attachment 20311
These are 2 of the hunters you posted. The other 2 were twinks. Are these the ones who ruin the bracket?
You're missing the point again. I honestly don't understand your intentions. Multiple people told you horde have more twink hunters and you still not believe.
I'm just saying those aren't a problem for the bracket. We don't have them in mind when saying horde has more hunter twinks.
No one really cares about these guys as they hit like a wet noodle and flop in 3 globals. The issue is the fully geared hunter twinks with 190+ agi, tons of mastery and what not. The ones who hit for 400+ raptors or 1600 aimed shots. Horde definetely has more of them. 90% of Alliance hunters are F2Ps with BG or quest gear. I inspect them before each BG. It's not like we don't have any, just very few. Most played classes on alliance are paladin and priest.
We are proving 20s is as active as everI say it again. Just for the love of god, stop debating such a useless topic. And move along with ur day. This thread has turned into an stuipid discussion, moving away from the intended topic. So just stop.
Why I do exactly what he would want me to do. Not believing in your theory built on irrational measurementThanks for telling everyone you havent read Popper?
If Im wrong, prove me wrong. Now youre just making baseless claims and attacking the weak base of my claim.Why I do exactly what he would want me to do. Not believing in your theory built on irrational measurement