Is 20s still active?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ginowski said:
I can assure you that its true,in eu at least,horse have full twink hunt team and alliance barely have 1 twink hunt in teams.
Click to expand...
No you cant. I literally just posted alliance having more hunters than horde in 100% of games just 2 pages of bullshit ago.
 
Goesid said:
No you cant. I literally just posted alliance having more hunters than horde in 100% of games just 2 pages of bullshit ago.
Click to expand...
Well im in bgs with my alliance mage for 5 months now and in 90% of the games horde have all the hunter twinks so yea i can :)
 
Ginowski said:
Well im in bgs with my alliance mage for 5 months now and in 90% of the games horde have all the hunter twinks so yea i can :)
Click to expand...
So you havent played much, thats okey.
You need to look at your own team too because its greener than a nature reserve.
 
Conzil said:
nice sample size
Click to expand...

Ill do more for you later if its needed but why keep doing the same expecting a different result.

So how many games in a row do alliance need to have more hunters for you to admit defeat? Or do you want a tally of all hunters and how many in each game and compare %s. What does it take for Conzil to surrender a lost cause?

Ginowski said:
Ok im guessing you are just a troll so have a nice day knowing horde have all the hunter twinks.Cheers mate
Click to expand...
Because I dont believe you when you say something opposing my own point and contradicting the evidence Ive brought to support my claim? Shocking. What did you expect to happend? I was gonna go oh this guy clearly knows whats up and bow to your opinion? But no call me a troll and walk away, its certainly easier than arguing a case youre losing.
 
Play bg, see the horde in balance, doesn't care, why? Because meta chasing kids, burn out fast.
They'll last a month if that.
Worry less,
Game more,
Dont tell people what they do or don't see, you look salty and dense,
I respect both sides experience,
I don't discredit either or think and evidence will prove a thing.
This game swings like a whore in season.
Stop trying to win a conversion based on opinions,
The post wasn't about complaining about what you are encountering.
 
Goesid said:
Ill do more for you later if its needed but why keep doing the same expecting a different result.

So how many games in a row do alliance need to have more hunters for you to admit defeat? Or do you want a tally of all hunters and how many in each game and compare %s. What does it take for Conzil to surrender a lost cause?


Because I dont believe you when you say something opposing my own point and contradicting the evidence Ive brought to support my claim? Shocking. What did you expect to happend? I was gonna go oh this guy clearly knows whats up and bow to your opinion? But no call me a troll and walk away, its certainly easier than arguing a case youre losing.
Click to expand...
Always funny seeing trolls go ham hahaha
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivo
memes.png
 
Goesid said:
No you cant. I literally just posted alliance having more hunters than horde in 100% of games just 2 pages of bullshit ago.
Click to expand...
If someone in science field were to make a theory based on experiment consisting of 2 tests and called it enough just because something happened 2 times in a row he would be most likely pushed to suicide by other scientists. How is this a proof? If I go to a random SL raid right now and somehow in both of them an arcane mage is top dps would that mean that arcane mage is all time top dmg? No, but you know what would prove who's top dps in SL raids? Checking logs from other raids, see rankings, in other words taking as many instances into account as possible. So I believe that someone who is constantly playing bgs in EU and seeing bracket all day every day has just "slightly" more chance of being right about that topic
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivo
upload_2021-12-3_14-25-26.png

upload_2021-12-3_14-25-40.png


These are 2 of the hunters you posted. The other 2 were twinks. Are these the ones who ruin the bracket?
You're missing the point again. I honestly don't understand your intentions. Multiple people told you horde have more twink hunters and you still not believe.
 
Nutsmite said:
If someone in science field were to make a theory based on experiment consisting of 2 tests and called it enough just because something happened 2 times in a row he would be most likely pushed to suicide by other scientists. How is this a proof? If I go to a random SL raid right now and somehow in both of them an arcane mage is top dps would that mean that arcane mage is all time top dmg? No, but you know what would prove who's top dps in SL raids? Checking logs from other raids, see rankings, in other words taking as many instances into account as possible. So I believe that someone who is constantly playing bgs in EU and seeing bracket all day every day has just "slightly" more chance of being right about that topic
Click to expand...

Thanks for telling everyone you havent read Popper?

No, they would try to get contradicting evidence, my statement even if the proof so far is limited you can very much prove me wrong by trying to solo queue and get 3 horde teams in a row with more hunters, putting me back on the defensive. But you dont do that because you dont know shit.
Ivo said:
View attachment 20310
View attachment 20311

These are 2 of the hunters you posted. The other 2 were twinks. Are these the ones who ruin the bracket?
You're missing the point again. I honestly don't understand your intentions. Multiple people told you horde have more twink hunters and you still not believe.
Click to expand...
You and your fucking qualifiers. Yes those are twinks? How many sockets does a hunter need to be a twink in your eyes? Wheres the line. God Im so sick of your retard antics lol.
 
I'm just saying those aren't a problem for the bracket. We don't have them in mind when saying horde has more hunter twinks.
No one really cares about these guys as they hit like a wet noodle and flop in 3 globals. The issue is the fully geared hunter twinks with 190+ agi, tons of mastery and what not. The ones who hit for 400+ raptors or 1600 aimed shots. Horde definetely has more of them. 90% of Alliance hunters are F2Ps with BG or quest gear. I inspect them before each BG. It's not like we don't have any, just very few. Most played classes on alliance are paladin and priest.
 
Ivo said:
I'm just saying those aren't a problem for the bracket. We don't have them in mind when saying horde has more hunter twinks.
No one really cares about these guys as they hit like a wet noodle and flop in 3 globals. The issue is the fully geared hunter twinks with 190+ agi, tons of mastery and what not. The ones who hit for 400+ raptors or 1600 aimed shots. Horde definetely has more of them. 90% of Alliance hunters are F2Ps with BG or quest gear. I inspect them before each BG. It's not like we don't have any, just very few. Most played classes on alliance are paladin and priest.
Click to expand...

You think every horde hunt is decked?
How many sockets though? Since youre deciding what a twink is, wheres the line?
 
No, I don't think that of course. I've inspected multiple of them and they were stacked. While the ones I play with are F2Ps most of the time.

You get the idea. I don't think I need to explain the difference between a F2P with quest items and a geared twink.
 
I say it again. Just for the love of god, stop debating such a useless topic. And move along with ur day. This thread has turned into an stuipid discussion, moving away from the intended topic. So just stop.
 
Dukon said:
I say it again. Just for the love of god, stop debating such a useless topic. And move along with ur day. This thread has turned into an stuipid discussion, moving away from the intended topic. So just stop.
Click to expand...
We are proving 20s is as active as ever :)
 
Nutsmite said:
Why I do exactly what he would want me to do. Not believing in your theory built on irrational measurement
Click to expand...
If Im wrong, prove me wrong. Now youre just making baseless claims and attacking the weak base of my claim.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Top