Druiddroid
OG
I've realized that arguing from a evidence based standpoint with someone who professes mere faith is like trying to swat a plane out of thin air with a fly swatter. By stating that they have faith in their position they are openly admitting willful ignorance to all evidence contradicting their beliefs and shutting out all the instances in their lives where their faith will be tested. Almost like closing their eyes or plugging their ears and keep going forward cutting off everything in their peripheral vision that may distract them. To a lot of theists saying that they have faith in their position would feel as though they are conceding something to atheists. Admitting that there are discrepancies in how the world works vs how the Bible tells them it works, it almost always gives the atheist an upper hand in any debate. So a lot of theists throw themselves into the corner of their favorite apologist and make fantastic use of their well evolved confirmation bias to keep them strong in their faith. This is a battle that can only be won with time, and not in this moment. With new generations of children growing up in an ever expanding age of information, it becomes easier for them to question their own beliefs by themselves. Then they can come to their own conclusions and will be raised without the dogma attached to believing in magical sky daddies. In time, theistic numbers will dwindle and eventually be confined to underground clubs or corners of this world currently inhabited by conspiracy theorists.
Another reason of mine for cutting back my engagement with theists is because of the blatant dishonest tactics use to discredit the others position. An atheist will rarely ever mention something or state a fact unless they have a rudimentary understanding of what they are trying to convey. The theists will more often than not argue from complete and utter ignorance and sometimes even resort to conspiracy theory to disprove you. I have a very low tolerance for bullshit and this was the main reason I was so furious toward myself for believing in religious bullshit for as long as I have. I did not have a traumatic experience that happened to me which turned me to atheism. I did not have someone "shake my faith." I questioned myself, looked for the truth, studied the facts the best I could and came to my own conclusions. The best part of the process is that it's never ending, and everything I once denied that kept me strong in my faith I can now openly research and learn about. All without feeling like the wrath of God was about to be unleashed upon my sorry ass.
This is something religious people ever do, and when they do they will turn to religiously based sources to strengthen their current held beliefs. It drives me to the point of wanting to punch a hole in the wall when someone can be thankful for the existence of all of scientific advances, many people toiled over, died for and have been persecuted for over many centuries of investigation, people who were testing sheer hard work only to have that same hard work labeled a conspiracy when it crosses the line of being beneficial to them and pointing out the inconsistencies in their belief system. When I see someone in need and the common response from theists is I will pray for you
I want to shake that person by the neck. Why when faced with adversity is the first response from an atheist is what can I do that can make a tangible difference to that person's suffering of problem? When the theists decides to take two minutes to send an invisible telegram with NO address to an invisible puppet master, do they honestly think they've done something beneficial when they shot off a few words into thin air?
Every apologetic I've came into contact with are rooted in faith and wishful thinking. When someone think like this I don't want to engage them. They already know the answer and are deliberately painting over it with faith, because it makes them a soldier for their god, because the suffering for the position they hold in the face of facts contradicting their position makes them a martyr in the eyes of their god. Because they simply can't wrap their head around the fact that this life may be the only life they'll ever have. Does this make them a bad person? Probably not. Are they allowed to preach to me, tell me what I believe and deny scientific fact because it suits their position? HELL NO. That is where my tolerance for their position ends.
Another reason of mine for cutting back my engagement with theists is because of the blatant dishonest tactics use to discredit the others position. An atheist will rarely ever mention something or state a fact unless they have a rudimentary understanding of what they are trying to convey. The theists will more often than not argue from complete and utter ignorance and sometimes even resort to conspiracy theory to disprove you. I have a very low tolerance for bullshit and this was the main reason I was so furious toward myself for believing in religious bullshit for as long as I have. I did not have a traumatic experience that happened to me which turned me to atheism. I did not have someone "shake my faith." I questioned myself, looked for the truth, studied the facts the best I could and came to my own conclusions. The best part of the process is that it's never ending, and everything I once denied that kept me strong in my faith I can now openly research and learn about. All without feeling like the wrath of God was about to be unleashed upon my sorry ass.
This is something religious people ever do, and when they do they will turn to religiously based sources to strengthen their current held beliefs. It drives me to the point of wanting to punch a hole in the wall when someone can be thankful for the existence of all of scientific advances, many people toiled over, died for and have been persecuted for over many centuries of investigation, people who were testing sheer hard work only to have that same hard work labeled a conspiracy when it crosses the line of being beneficial to them and pointing out the inconsistencies in their belief system. When I see someone in need and the common response from theists is I will pray for you
I want to shake that person by the neck. Why when faced with adversity is the first response from an atheist is what can I do that can make a tangible difference to that person's suffering of problem? When the theists decides to take two minutes to send an invisible telegram with NO address to an invisible puppet master, do they honestly think they've done something beneficial when they shot off a few words into thin air?
Every apologetic I've came into contact with are rooted in faith and wishful thinking. When someone think like this I don't want to engage them. They already know the answer and are deliberately painting over it with faith, because it makes them a soldier for their god, because the suffering for the position they hold in the face of facts contradicting their position makes them a martyr in the eyes of their god. Because they simply can't wrap their head around the fact that this life may be the only life they'll ever have. Does this make them a bad person? Probably not. Are they allowed to preach to me, tell me what I believe and deny scientific fact because it suits their position? HELL NO. That is where my tolerance for their position ends.