Graycyn
Legend
And here I thought it was about having fun.
Never said it was just about the best gear, but that absolutely plays a factor. And yes, it's about fun.
And here I thought it was about having fun.
Since I was born in Texas, Wrestling aka Wraslin' was a big deal when I was a kid and I must say Duopaladin is a perfect Heel.
The thing that really bothers me is the inability of some people to unterstand the criticism.
In all honesty, everyone who pays for this game can make as many 24s or p2p 20s as he/she wants because I dont think, that there is a duty for people to play after whats fair to the weakest link - f2ps with their restrictions here - as some people posted here. But Yes, it is noble to think like that.
I criticise people for not taking a challenge, but making use of the imbalance of the bracket. To some extend this also includes f2ps who keep playing fotm classes over and over e.g. hunters in cata, hpalas in 5.0.0, prot warris in 5.1 (or 5.2? cant remember the exact patch) (I'm not talking about playing a class, thats strong overall, but seasonal strong ones), but it shows even more in absolutely superior p2p enchs, profs and 21-24 abilities.
Stating that the difference aint that big anymore is rediculous and would have never been made by anyone who speaks from f2p expierence.
Again, if a person decides to play the undeniable superior way, I'm ok with that, because I cant do anything about it anyway in the end. But either not admitting it or not even trying to realise and being aware of it, is what makes me angry.
The difference really isn't huge anymore. Especially with the rise of the F2P healer. The only seriously ridiculous 24 is a spriest, or a rogue that stacks agi and bursts down an FC.
I only read this thread until page 10, so I dont know what else you wrote.
Have you played a f2p lately? If not, then dont presume to be able to judge about balance here.
Also: rise of f2p healers? That doesnt have anything to do with the subject matter. That has something to do with teamplay in a bg and that can be different from game to game. What will stay constantly superior are p2ps advantages and I have seen 24s bursting through 2+ decent healers. The point is, that playing a p2p BiS char allows your team to focus less on teamplay, then it would require when there is no p2p around - u cant deny that. They ruin the tactical site of pvp and that is what I am sick of. And shadows aint the only thing, that can crit or burst for a shitload of dmg. Others are ferals, fire mages, frost mages, hunters, moonkins...
Edit: Is that Qtshocks from your sig the only char you have in this bracket?
I play f2p all the time. They're fine. With the scaling f2p healers are incredible and game-changing. Everything is viable and does well in a capable player's hands. I'm tired of this self-victimization and complex that f2p players have. p2p players have an advantage, but it's not that drastic.
A p2p bursting through to heals? I find that hard to believe, or it was incredibly lucky crits with zerker.
A p2p bursting through to heals? I find that hard to believe, or it was incredibly lucky crits with zerker.
Kinda like this?
Yeah, lucky crits. .
As I've said, the F2P - P2P gap isn't huge like these crybaby f2p's make it seem like
Besides the typical "24's ruin the bracket"....Why do 20s hate 24s so much? I don't get it. I've seen some really good 20s kick some butt.
The most fun I ever have is being outmatched and pulling out a win due to better strategy.