imacheeser
Legend
look mocha is a thug, you need to be bitching at motards like super
Who wrote the CoC?
Kincaide
Certain Mocha had a hand in writing it when Shane was around. Which pretty well debunks his whole argument.
Certain Mocha had a hand in writing it when Shane was around. Which pretty well debunks his whole argument.
...I always wanted, and still do want complete consistency with the CoC and the moderators. If the staff doesn't respect the CoC by not taking it seriously, why in the fuck would the users of the site? Now I personally didn't agree with how strict the CoC was and the version that I had typed up in 2011 was VERY fitting for the community back in 2011 but it quickly became antiquated as the community changed and it had never been altered to be less strict in the more recent years. I was asked to clean the site of all CoC breaches by Shane and I had definitely done my job at doing that. The reason why I was asked to moderate and do so was because it's clear that I don't care how many people like me, if I'm given a task to police a website, I'm going to do that even if everyone thinks I'm a Nazi. You can't really disagree with the moderators for enforcing the CoC. It's their job. You CAN however completely disagree WITH the CoC and be proactive about the situation and bring it up to the staff in private messages requesting they review the CoC and alter it to be less strict to cater more towards the current atmosphere of the community. It's actually something I remember trying to talk to Shane about several times. In the past year, I just said fuck it and stopped taking the CoC seriously because people had stopped being problematic. You can ask Pizza about how chill I've been about the CoC in the past year.
I like how there is two people, out of hundreds of members, carrying on this argument.
Like please, don't you have something better to do?
Agonist makes valid points so anyone who's trying to dismiss his argument is a fraud. He may be brash or aggressive in some aspects; nonetheless, the poll and responses to this thread show he is not alone in his argument. I think it boils down to this: the CoC is one thing; what really matters is how seriously the moderators take it and how passionately they reinforce it. I think that, lately, the mods have been taking it too seriously. No need to change the CoC itself necessarily, the mods just need to take it with a grain of salt.
I'm not sure it's a matter of deserving it. The Staff are people who are willing to volunteer their time to try to keep this site running well. Its not fun to go through all the reports or to clean up or close threads, but the staff are willing to put in the effort to try to make this site a good place to visit.Other than Hunnybuns and maybe Conq I don't think any of them deserve it, but that's another issue at hand.
Build a list of factual examples of any moderator overstepping the CoC. Not a list of names whom don't like someone.
I absolutely defy you to come up with a list of examples of how a member posted something that WAS NOT A BLATANT COC VIOLATION and RECEIVED DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST THEIR ACCOUNT.
Agonist makes valid points so anyone who's trying to dismiss his argument is a fraud. He may be brash or aggressive in some aspects; nonetheless, the poll and responses to this thread show he is not alone in his argument. I think it boils down to this: the CoC is one thing; what really matters is how seriously the moderators take it and how passionately they reinforce it. I think that, lately, the mods have been taking it too seriously. No need to change the CoC itself necessarily, the mods just need to take it with a grain of salt.
Sometimes I really think you people need a good reality check.