This is my point. To go with the hunter example, I could have a dozen twinks here telling you that man, we did 5s on Windrunner, and the team without the hunter lost rather often. That we split the hunters up between the two sides because the power of love wasn't enough to make the team with other classes outplay the hunter. That we did 2s, 3s, 5s, and duels, and that they consistently were on the winning teams. I could make a list, objectively, of all the tools hunters have at their disposal (oh wait, I and many other have). I could do all of this, and you would still say "well consensus means nothing, majority means nothing, personal observations mean nothing" and say that you don't think hunters are OP.
That is why it is a waste of time. I think I could convince a brick wall to consider other viewpoints or evidence far easier than you.
Not exactly. I would then proceed to ask for much more information. I would have to know all the details and variables that went into games before I could say that 'yes, hunters are OP.' Some of those variables are things that no one is willing to produce, especially in our games. One of the major variables is group coordination. Being able to use the right abilities at the right time in conjunction with the rest of your team, to make them effective, is the most important aspect of group pvp. Whether you're trying to get a kill for a flag return, or trying to setup an offensive push by stalling their offense, coordination is the foundation for it all.
My point is and always has been, I would gladly agree with any one of you claiming that hunters are OP, provided that you can substantiate all the variables that went into whatever scenario you are talking about, and can indefinitely exclude everything besides hunter mechanics as the determining factor of the outcome.
That is why it is a waste of time. I think I could convince a brick wall to consider other viewpoints or evidence far easier than you.
It's a waste of time because you're not willing to go to any lengths to prove your point of view. You just want to say that hunters are OP and use anecdotal evidence to support your point of view. 'I got aim shotted for 1.5k hp at 41 yards, that's over half my life fully buffed. Hunters are OP because no other class can do that.' It might be wise of you to consider that every class has abilities that change combat, which other classes simply do not have. How many possible BG scenarios do we have to rule out before you consider that maybe hunters were balanced a certain way and maybe you're just not playing group pvp in a fashion consistent with the way they were balanced?
My point was that this time of the year always comes with a drop in activity, and that summer has traditionally IMPROVED activity. It is a factual and accurate statement. Combine this with the fact that we moved to 4 game nights which has time and time again DROPPED activity on ALL the nights, and we have inactivity.
Except that this time last year we had significantly more activity than we have had in the last few months, all the way up to mid November. Games didn't stop until people started going on vacation to spend their holidays with family, which is a perfectly valid reason for activity to drop. I wouldn't state that there is a trend that's being followed here by games ending on September 22nd. Not one that matches up with anything you've claimed is at fault for games being over with.
So all of the people that agree that they were making games unfun, that blatently came out and said they stopped queueing early some nights because of them, and all the people I've talked to about why they aren't interested in playing, and myself are what? Your opinion that there needs to be 100% consensus for something to be a problem is frustrating to deal with.
There's two things wrong with this statement. One, hunters have been back in full force since early June when Detox showed up to play. There were many game nights when both alliance and horde had multiple hunters present on the field (good ones, at that) when games didn't stop immediately afterward. I highly doubt that if hunters were really that big of a problem even a larger part of the community (rather than just a few players), games would have stopped in June, not nearly 4 months later near the end of September.
Secondly, you're drastically over stating the number of people who have a problem with hunters to the point of deciding to quit because of it. If the few of you can quit games early on, and games still happen, it's likely that there really were so few of you who have that much of a problem with hunters. Besides that, the last few nights where we haven't had games, it's those people who typically play hunters who haven't been showing up. Not people who have a problem with hunters.
If you think that 19s aren't popular because they are the first twink bracket players get to, I don't even. That is the primary reason, which created a large population, which then spurred more people to play there, because it is the largest bracket. They aren't playing for the quality of games, they are playing for the quantity. You can get pops 24/7.
I don't think that the level at which you're playing has anything to do with the popularity of a bracket. Level is just a number. How many players play 19s AND other brackets? You'll see people claiming many reasons for playing in a certain bracket. Some will claim that talents/abilitites/gear/enchants/glyphs make for an interesting environment. Some will claim that their friends play it. Some will claim that they just happened to try pvp at that level and really enjoyed it. Some will claim that the burst is just right. There are probably a great many more reasons that all come before 'it's easy and inexpensive' or 'it was the first level I could twink at.'
If what you're saying was accurate or realistic, then the 10-14 bracket would be the most popular bracket out there. But it's not.
70s are the same way, many players did not buy LK and cata. Many others turned off XP on characters that were still 70. Many more joined because with about 3k honor, you buy literally all the gear you need. Resilience being around is the final piece to the popularity of the bracket, because most of the 29s,39s, and 49s that were disenfranchised from their brackets by blizzard's complete inability to balance burst at low levels moved there.
A lot of this is just conjecture. Theory crafting. Whatever. some of it may be true on a case by case scenario, but I don't think any of it is a general reason why 70s are so popular. Just looking at the potential burst from the right combination of class/professions, 70s can be just as bursty (if not more) than any other bracket. There has to be some underlying reason why people in general would quit the middle brackets in favor of 19s or 70s, aside from anything you've mentioned here.
After all, that's only a realistic or accurate point one could have.
I know you don't. You are so far away from reality, it continually surprises me.
Reality? You mean like seeing with my own eyes, a bracket getting games for months and months desipte claims of too many hunters/banned items being detirmental? You mean like watching as people (both potential new recruits and existing players) leaving the bracket and stating that their reasoning was the constant drama and vote kicking? You mean like sitting here as good players on the other team continuously out perform us with coordinated efforts on both offense/defense, game after game, night after night, week after week, month after month? Or how about face palming as horde players keep suggesting that it's the responsibility of better players to even out teams for the sake of a healthy growing bracket?
A bracket that very few players are making any attempts at recruiting for. A bracket where new blood is more likely to get treated like garbage than be treated like a valued member of the community. A bracket where the very will of the outspoken players demands that we become insular because that's the only way to keep a standard of quality between games. An insular bracket is a dead bracket.
Case in point.... 29s.
You invent personas to anonymously troll with. Don't act like you're a voice of reason, you uneducated towel.
I didn't invent anything. I am perfectly capable of different mannerisms when it suits me. It's interesting that you got all upset about it.
If I were you, I would stop accusing people that disagree with you of being trolls.