<Xtreme Gang Crew> vs <Viciously Delicious> 6/8/2013

Stealthcnt said:
and can u list somee1 GOOD keyword GOOD that uses alchemy
i cant think of any and if 1 of my players had it i would make them drop it and relvl something else
Click to expand...

Your argument is that no one "good' uses alchemy? Why? Because it's only for bads? If it is indeed "for bads" then why isn't it common knowledge that all professions and most consumables that are a result of such professions, such as agility potions which grant +13 agility (26 attack power to a sub rogue) from alchemy, are allowed to be used.

This would include JC stones etc and would not obviously include Swiftness Potions if there is a ban by popular demand on the use of them.

With all of the constraints on premades no wonder why no one enjoys doing them any more.
 
Stealthcnt said:
Bcuz u said we cant predict when we can becuz teams are set


1st paragraph was to u 2nd 1 was to mocha jist im on phone so i cant multo quote easily and thats why my spelling is bad right now sow sorry
Click to expand...

I said I cant predict cause I dont know the comp/who it is that is playing Nothing has been posted so I could not give a educated guess. Does that make sense. All I know is I played like 4 members of Viciously Delicious the other night and they were playing well together, the only members of XGC that I know of is you and sqooshi
 
Mocha said:
Your argument is that no one "good' uses alchemy? Why? Because it's only for bads? If it is indeed "for bads" then why isn't it common knowledge that all professions and most consumables that are a result of such professions, such as agility potions which grant +13 agility (26 attack power to a sub rogue) from alchemy, are allowed to be used.

This would include JC stones etc and would not obviously include Swiftness Potions if there is a ban by popular demand on the use of them.

With all of the constraints on premades no wonder why no one enjoys doing them any more.
Click to expand...

Not really a constraint if no1 playing in the premade is affected by no alchemy

Lifeblood and skinning greatly outweigh mixology

still waiting for u to list some1 who uses it
 
Khaos said:
I said I cant predict cause I dont know the comp/who it is that is playing Nothing has been posted so I could not give a educated guess. Does that make sense. All I know is I played like 4 members of Viciously Delicious the other night and they were playing well together, the only members of XGC that I know of is you and sqooshi
Click to expand...

Well dont u think some1 involved with posting rules would know

but nyways illegal ia fine by no alchemy his reaction was what a dumb rule he didnt know ppl even ise alchemy and sqooshi is fine by no alchemy

this rule was decided by the 2 gms not me im just posting the rules
 
Stealthcnt said:
Well dont u think some1 involved with posting rules would know

but nyways illegal ia fine by no alchemy his reaction was what a dumb rule he didnt know ppl even ise alchemy and sqooshi is fine by no alchemy

this rule was decided by the 2 gms not me im just posting the rules
Click to expand...


Im soooooo confused but alrighty then
 
Khaos said:
Im soooooo confused but alrighty then
Click to expand...

ok ill spoon feed it to you

this is what you said:

Khaos said:
Well first and foremost you can never predict these kinds of things, especially since you dont know both premades comps and/or who is the Ateams.
Click to expand...

My response is that yes, we can predict this kind of stuff because we know who is playing in the premades. It doesn't really matter if people not involved in it aren't sure if there will possibly be alchemy users, because the GMs of each guild and the person making the premade thread know that there is no one in the premade that will have alchemy as a profession.





The GMs have already decided these rules so people stop acting like it's me coming up with the rules, I'm just the one posting what they have decided on

this part isnt directed just at Khaos rather to every1 in general
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Stealthcnt said:
ok ill spoon feed it to you

this is what you said:



My response is that yes, we can predict this kind of stuff because we know who is playing in the premades. It doesn't really matter if people not involved in it aren't sure if there will possibly be alchemy users, because the GMs of each guild and the person making the premade thread know that there is no one in the premade that will have alchemy as a profession.

The GMs have already decided these rules so people stop acting like it's me coming up with the rules, I'm just the one posting what they have decided on
Click to expand...

You guys know who is in the premades.......I have no clue who is what, what particular person is repping each spot, THe only people who would know is the people in the guilds (Im not in ether guild) Why do you keep bringing up alchemy I have said nothing about that profession and I am not giving any grief about the rules lmao! ~ok sorry since it isnt directed at me, but still haha~

I did say you dont know who is in the premade, let me say that was poorly worded, It should be "I" since I cannot predict who is going to win since I do not know what comps are being played, who is playing. As I said in previous Posts Ive seen maybe 4 VD members playing and they seemed to have good synergy. The only 2 people I know in XGC is you and sqooshi, So how am I supose to predict a winner?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mocha said:
Your argument is that no one "good' uses alchemy? Why? Because it's only for bads? If it is indeed "for bads" then why isn't it common knowledge that all professions and most consumables that are a result of such professions, such as agility potions which grant +13 agility (26 attack power to a sub rogue) from alchemy, are allowed to be used.

This would include JC stones etc and would not obviously include Swiftness Potions if there is a ban by popular demand on the use of them.

With all of the constraints on premades no wonder why no one enjoys doing them any more.
Click to expand...

Why do you care? When Mayhem decides to premade you can set your own rules and have this discussion. Until then you are clearly trolling this thread by attempting to derail it.
On topic. Good luck to both teams.

Sent from my LG-MS770 using Xparent Skyblue Tapatalk 2
 
Stealthcnt said:
well your GM already said no alchemy. he was surprised when i asked him whether alchemy should be allowed and didn't even know people used alchemy

so it would be pretty silly of you to do so
Click to expand...

I was merely pointing out that a recognizable name on eu (and one with experience) uses said profession in question. I cannot make a comment on the skill level of said player.

am I allowed to use lvl 1 bsing?
 
tence said:
I was merely pointing out that a recognizable name on eu (and one with experience) uses said profession in question. I cannot make a comment on the skill level of said player.

am I allowed to use lvl 1 bsing?
Click to expand...

why u qq so much zzz, just play with the rules that are set who cares not even a big deal stop being a pussy cus u awful
 
After looking at both teams Armories and guessing the team of Viciously Delicious I have decided that XGC has the edge in this one (bye 1 point in my scoring scale) My guess might change if the team I figured VD would be using isnt what they are using. If someone from VD would PM me a Roster I would give a more educated decision.
 
Khaos said:
After looking at both teams Armories and guessing the team of Viciously Delicious I have decided that XGC has the edge in this one (bye 1 point in my scoring scale) My guess might change if the team I figured VD would be using isnt what they are using. If someone from VD would PM me a Roster I would give a more educated decision.
Click to expand...

I think we're running Tence on all 9 accounts and I'll FC.
 
Date's been changed to 6/8/13 9pm BH time.

Also, thanks to Illegal for stepping up to fraps for Viciously Delicious.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top