drfgt
Legend
I was just showing your bevy of researched back insultsShowing once again that you have no real points to make. Still need a tissue?
I was just showing your bevy of researched back insultsShowing once again that you have no real points to make. Still need a tissue?
The ironic part is that you're probably not very much higherRight, comparing charge to sap? nice 1550 rating lols.
Right, comparing charge to sap? nice 1550 rating lols.
I was just showing your bevy of researched back insults
I wasn't basing it off healer 1v1s, but okay. Now you're comparing Sap to Charge but only when a hunter in a certain guild is using bugs. You've lost all credibilityyea, while your basing warsong off healer 1v1s, when sap is nullified 90% of the time if a train cow hunter is on the team mend pet bugging and getting heals in combat, yet you can still charge them
No where in your posts have you provided Irrefutable evidence that Warriors aren't Underpowered. Also you said the 3% buff was 21 damage so therefore druids aren't OP. Except I wasn't saying the 3% buff is way too muchYou quoted them, scrotum, but had no real retort. Until you can assemble sufficient mental power to do so, you are nothing but a baseless whiner.
I'm afraid I know the bracket all too well.u clearly dont know the bracket very well so im leaving you be
I mentioned that even with 25% ms we can't solo healers and that means I'm basing everything off 1v1?Every justification you have used so far is based off of 1v1 scenarios, Blizzard has stated multiple times they make no effort to balance this game around 1v1s all this thread is, is a rage thread.
I've been playing 19's since pre-bcI think it's safe to say drfgt is quite new to the bracket.. I was prob playing 19's before this kid hit puberty?
No where in your posts have you provided Irrefutable evidence that Warriors aren't Underpowered. Also you said the 3% buff was 21 damage so therefore druids aren't OP. Except I wasn't saying the 3% buff is way too much
You claimed to irrefutably show that warriors do well, which you did nothing of the sorts. that's what I meantWhere did I say that warriors aren't underpowered? Jeez man, you need to work on your reading comprehension. ;]
You claimed to irrefutably show that warriors do well, which you did nothing of the sorts. that's what I meant