Wilwayco said:F2P Horde players don't have access to the BOA helm. The whole idea behind using it as a substitute to fill the gap in an IMBA immediately folds on it's self when you compare a F2P to a P2P given the circumstances in that scenario. Ergo, your P2P horde has an advantage over F2P Horde players. Logic dictates that if you're willing to bend the rules even just a little, you've pretty much broken the spirit entirely. Why not bend another? Or even break one entirely? You'd be better off just rolling a 24. If you aren't going to be a pure 20, for the f2p 20 experience which is what the bracket was originally about. So if you're going to go against the brackets rules, why not go all out? Because players want to FEEL like they're part of the experience that they've already jipped themselves out of.
The reason a lot of people got excited about the changes to trial accounts is because we were given limits. When people don't want to follow those limits, it's pointless. That's why I say just roll a 24. You've already ruined it for yourself. But on the same token, as I've said many times in this topic; Wear a BoA helm. I don't care, no one cares. Someone asked a question and players answered it. It's all about the kind of player you want to be, and you want people to see you as. Do you want to work hard? Or take short cuts?
i asked if youd rather people rolled bis 24s or 20s who use ONE peice of gear difference than the rest of the community, and you state that rolling 24s would be a better alternative lol, i'm not one to talk because i have a 24 but i also have a 20. obviously the restriction makes gearing up etc fun but with the current state of horde vs ally i dont think ally players have the choice to be picky.
this is an evolving community and requires adjustments to create a feeling of fairness, i say if it makes more people roll horde 20s then boa helm shouldnt be shunned out at all if a player chooses to use it