When are we going to address the elephant in the 20-29 bracket?

[BANKONE]

see you soon in the bgs

Something about insignias being yummy

 

[toskosa]

This is just setting yourself up for aggravation. Weekend is a no-go zone for random solo queue PvP since like.... ever.

(but it is true that at stupid morning hours horde has won most of my games played this xpac, regardless my faction)

Idk i que on the weekends and it seems fine to me /shrugs.

 

[Warglave]

Idk i que on the weekends and it seems fine to me /shrugs.

Ya but you're a masochist that plays rogues!

(i'll comfortably admit my bias in the misery that is weekends, confirmed easily by not playing during them )

 

[glancealot]

look at the scoreboard and guess the score:

 

[raziel83]

look at the scoreboard and guess the score:

You just made a thread complaining about there being too many alliance twinks then you win a game with a ton of horde twinks and start gloating. lolwut

 

[glancealot]

You just made a thread complaining about there being too many alliance twinks then you win a game with a ton of horde twinks and start gloating. lolwut

what do you mean? alliance had way more twinks and way more kills?

 

[raziel83]

what do you mean? alliance had way more twinks and way more kills?

Idk what your definition of twink is but I was the only geared person on my team. And I had to heal myself. Trying queuing alliance right now, horde steam rolling.

 

[glancealot]

Idk what your definition of twink is but I was the only geared person on my team. And I had to heal myself. Trying queuing alliance right now, horde steam rolling.

I was playing against you? I don't know who you are but our guys were dropping like flies (for every ally character death, there was literally 78/41 = 1.9 horde deaths).

which is aligned with how my thread is pointing out the abundance of alliance twinks.

maybe this what people's definition of "horde hours"?

just look at the SS and think for a second,

 

[raziel83]

I don't know who you are but our guys were dropping like flies

Look at my sig, now look at who got most of the kills. So your logic is that because I killed a bunch of people, alliance must have more twinks? lol

 

[glancealot]

you call this "horde steam rolling"? like, what's your definition of steam rolling? (combined scoreboard for reference)

 

[raziel83]

you call this "horde steam rolling"? like, what's your definition of steam rolling? (combined scoreboard for reference)

Yeah its 967 to 1500 points, not even close. Once again, I was the only geared alliance twink verse like 4 or so horde twinks. PS apparently stacking speed doesn't stop your teammates being deleted by chaos bolts. Who knew?

 

[ohti]

To be fair the factious "horde time" has always been a mystery as well.

It was not today during the day... nor any day this week. It was definitely not any night this week between 5 and 11... and it was definitely not on the weeked at any hour.

So if you want to play horde log in at 2:53 AM play until 4:12 AM... take a 22 min 37 sec break (pick up those weights get in a set, horde don't want skinny kids)... then log back in a and play for 6 minutes and 25 seconds... This is only the 4th and the 9th of every other month... not during a leap year. PRIME HORDE hours, aint nobody want to hear that whining.

Rly bc I got rolled by a team of like 7-8 horde the other day during prime time.

 

[glancealot]

Yeah its 967 to 1500 points, not even close. Once again, I was the only geared alliance twink verse like 4 or so horde twinks. PS apparently stacking speed doesn't stop your teammates being deleted by chaos bolts. Who knew?

had you played just a little bit more objectively, you guys would have won easily. look at the scoreboard let that sink in.

 

[raziel83]

had you played just a little bit more objectively, you guys would have won easily. look at the scoreboard let that sink in.

1 person can't carry a 15 man team. And all my kills were on flag points. But anyways, horde doesn't have it bad as you make it out to be.

 

[CigNus]

 

[raziel83]

This is a good point and I've taken it into consideration. I just felt compelled to call out the OP's hypocrisy of claiming to be the underdog while winning a game with more horde twinks. Also according to the OP's math, I'm the equivalent of 5 alliance twinks.

 

[glancealot]

This is a good point and I've taken it into consideration. I just felt compelled to call out the OP's hypocrisy of claiming to be the underdog while winning a game with more horde twinks. Also according to the OP's math, I'm the equivalent of 5 alliance twinks.

if horde wasn't the underdog in that game, i don't know what to say.

 

[Warglave]

had you played just a little bit more objectively, you guys would have won easily.

I know it may sound crazy, but levelers have the ability to ignore objectives and just run around herpaderp killin too. Not sure why you covered up the score in the original match photo up there, is that not the goal? NOT kills/damage?

edit- saying, just cuz they killed you lots doesnt mean they're all twinks or premade... why guess the score?

edit2- jesus, Raz is spot on, they're all levelers or un-twinked f2-play...

if horde wasn't the underdog in that game, i don't know what to say.

then you probably shoudnt, cuz this whole page is an utter fuckfest. Look up some armories first next time...

Before the only screenie you post is this in your thread about this:

almost every single game I was in, alliance simply had more twinks than horde did.

 

[accel]

you call this "horde steam rolling"? like, what's your definition of steam rolling? (combined scoreboard for reference)

if horde wasn't the underdog in that game, i don't know what to say.

Just to keep your sanity, you are right, looking at the screen and saying "the Horde steamrolled that" is insane. The Alliance steamrolled the Horde, but lost on objectives. Because they cared about steamrolling and getting kills. It's all in plain sight, in damage / healing numbers and in killing blows. Now, I didn't check any armories, so if the Horde had more twinks than the Alliance, then they perhaps played badly, but who steamrolled who is completely unequivocal.
[doublepost=1614936178,1614935898][/doublepost]Went to check the armory. The very first Alliance guy I checked, Fig - Mal'ganis, is a twink. Not going to check any further, the other guys in the thread are pulling your leg.

 

[Warglave]

Not going to check any further, the other guys in the thread are pulling your leg.

Ok.... do yourself a favor check just one more until you find another ally twink. Raz already said he was that top one.
(I'll start for you - the #2 ally is level 27 now)

"The first one was a twink so they all are" is no better than the other claim. Unless f2play with no enchants are "twinks".

edit- 4 ally from thunderlord, must be a premade too then, huh?

Maybe you guys can complain about the 60 rogue in there with 28k damage, 5 kills, and zero assaults. "Sync-60 carry"...