Bwappo said:That's a great example, actually. Your quote from post #18 puts forth a lucid opinion, and implies an invitation to elaborate. But the rest of post #18 (and the rest of the majority of your posts) you wrote in such an inflammatory and condescending manner, that you've muddied what you had to say.
I respect your opinion, and clearly you've played a lot. But when you cannot disagree respectfully with the rest of us or discuss what worked and didn't work for you in regards to playing with druid healers in the 29 bracket, your contempt reduces your posts to trolling. Your experience certainly deserves better treatment, but you need to give it a chance. Save the well-practiced trash talk for competition, and leave your baggage at the door. Otherwise, the best you can do here is entertain yourself with your acerbic postings, and that never ends well.
Good luck!
Bwappo
Ok fine, I'll bring cupcakes and rainbows to the next party.
I'm generally pretty civil on the forums (post 13 aka my first post). However, if someone starts an argument with me, I'm going to argue back. When they're arguing things that are blatantly wrong (posts 14 and 15) I'm going to call them out on it. I didnt say anything out of line in post 18 unless you think that naughty sarcasm hurt his wittle feewings. I could maybe see me getting out of line in post 22, but come on, the guy just admitted to being a bg stat humper right before that. You know thats hysterical. Anything after that is fair game from both sides.
Man, if I had just thrown glitter and butterflies around druids would be the terrible heals they are, but since I used that nefarious sarcasm and rhetoric, druids are pure pwnage.