Roflowned said:a hunter or warrior is so much better in the place of a rogue
and you've obviously never fought a good guild with that setup and won
o and anything is viable but that doesn't mean its worth using
Eliot said:BE's starting stats are just to bad IMO.
Roflowned said:ur forgetting cannibalize
jailbot said:imo shammys/druids/hunters should just be banned from premades.. problem solved. rogues viable again.
shanker said:rogues without a crippling poison or a "icy weapon" enchant that works are gimped.
Grunge said:i love how rogues always qq when other classes get buffed, whereas priests never get any love and we just accept it.
blueisbetterthanyou said:probably because you really dont need buffs and are one of the strongest 19 classes in wsg.
Grunge said:when was the last time you saw a priest coming twords you and you went "O SHIT, A PRIEST" and ran the other way?
Just wondering.
blueisbetterthanyou said:uh cant remember last time iv ever said: o shit x class and ran the other way
but priests dont need any loving at 19
Grunge said:when was the last time you saw a priest coming twords you and you went "O SHIT, A PRIEST" and ran the other way?
Just wondering.
Shazzrah said:I assume the orc racial does more dmg than the troll one?
Grunge said:I dont have math but im going to say no. Trolls is passive, all damage is increased by 5% against beasts, thats quite a bit. Orcs is ~40some ap, but it is avoidable.. and its only every 2 minutes.
I always knew trolls were the best