Donteventrii
OG
And here I thought it was Horde vs Alliance...Once Veteran accounts become a thing, F2Ps have yet another force working with them against 29 p2ps.
Fixed.
And here I thought it was Horde vs Alliance...Once Veteran accounts become a thing, F2Ps have yet another force working with them against 29 p2ps.
Fixed.
Bop said:The TL;DR of the conversation yesterday, which I do not think was off-topic, was that paying for any advantage you use in battlegrounds or arenas makes you no different than P2Ws.
Bop said:Some people won't be able to transition to Veteran for whatever reason, and they will be at a disadvantage against Veterans just as they are at a disadvantage against P2W's.
That is an indisputable fact.
No amount of comparing the $ value of a monthly subscription to the cost of a one-time payment will change that. For some, the cost of $5 is just as inaccessible as $1,000,000. Maybe they're too young to use a credit card, maybe they abhor the idea of paying money to a conglomerated company, or maybe they just don't have the money.
Are BGs still 20-30 min queues?
On EU queue times vary between 2 and 50 mins. With ~15 in evenings. But lotta AV popping now which is something.I thought they just fixed the queue bug, or at least 19s are popping again. Also, they are talking about making it so xp off can queue wargames, which will be a big deal.
Too much philosophy and fat-camp-feelings. I started played trial twinks back in Cata cause it was free, it was fun, and BGs were fast. I always thought of the various 25s (and 29s) as undertuned (read very hard) boss fights. I usually lost, when I won, it was glorious. Either way, nothing of actual value was lost.
Are BGs still 20-30 min queues? Cause that has a much bigger influence on my playing than all the other changes since cata combined.
Yes, they are, and that's the main reason XP off in any bracket, including this one, is not worth playing.
Is Skyrim free to play? What about Diablo 3? Once you pay for a game, it's a sunk cost. Just because you're not actively paying a subscription doesn't mean it's "free". It's the difference between a sunk cost and a fixed cost but both are still costs. Economics 101, bitches!
Easy solution: move on and play 19 (if possible) or 20 veteran and be happy that games finally get more competitive.
Reason to stay pure f2p can only be nostalgia after 6.1.
In the end, most of the f2ps want to pvp and have good games. With 6.1 you will be able to reduce the gap between you and a 29 p2p. Everyone should be happy about that.
Can you say RIP when it's actually dead and not when you think it will be?
For example in the past:
RIP F2P because p2p 24s in 5.4
RIP F2P because p2p 29s in 6.0
RIP F2P because any other stupid reason
I don't see how it's RIP when next patch rerolling, leveling and gearing a new f2p will be easier than ever