10-19 The Official Twink Cup 2016 Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn't you or Ephidel start the discussion regarding 3 Druids? I'm surprised if you didn't. If not, who did?

Secondly, the rule regarding the 3 Druid and 3 Monk rule was a potential mistake on my part when writing up the post I believe. I was under the impression that people were able to run 3 monks (1BM, 1 WW and 1 MW) and 3 Druids (2x Resto 1 Boomy with or without a rogue / 2x Resto 1 Guardian with or without a rogue / 2x Guardian 1 Resto with no rogue / 1 Resto 1 Guardian 1 Boomy with no rogue) and with it stating in the rules that only 1 boomkin is allowed that those are the only forms of compositions available to both classes. Again, this will have to be spoken about by the committee to make sure that all agree that it is not intended to be that way.

I was in the belief that i was merely writing down existing rules that usually do not get stated and i did this to try and make sure that everything was covered to make sure that reinforcing ruling could be more transparent. Things sometimes can come across incorrect when people sit down for over 13 hours straight concocting a post like this, i apologize for any inconvenience it may have caused people and i do ask that people try to refrain from articulating their opinions in a disrespectful / passive-aggressive manner in the future on this thread as it may result in posts being removed.

I believe i already said that it was my fault and that i thought i was putting existing rules that hadn't been mentioned in previous events into words. It was nothing to do with anyone else other than myself.
 
Didn't you or Ephidel start the discussion regarding 3 Druids? I'm surprised if you didn't. If not, who did?
Secondly, the rule regarding the 3 Druid and 3 Monk rule was a potential mistake on my part when writing up the post I believe. I was under the impression that people were able to run 3 monks (1BM, 1 WW and 1 MW) and 3 Druids (2x Resto 1 Boomy with or without a rogue / 2x Resto 1 Guardian with or without a rogue / 2x Guardian 1 Resto with no rogue / 1 Resto 1 Guardian 1 Boomy with no rogue) and with it stating in the rules that only 1 boomkin is allowed that those are the only forms of compositions available to both classes. Again, this will have to be spoken about by the committee to make sure that all agree that it is not intended to be that way.
 
I believe i already said that it was my fault and that i thought i was putting existing rules that hadn't been mentioned in previous events into words. It was nothing to do with anyone else other than myself.

Oh alright, fair enough. Didn't read that.
 
Those who open their mouth the most usually have the least to say

0mKXcg1.gif
 
Great post and huge probs to everyone involved in this! Especially the donation page is insane!

Three things that I noted and that has been pointed out before:
- The Discord issue; I agree with Buns: it can be a potential disaster if you tune in to the call when they're making important calls, and you can't predict when they will make those. And even with a 5 min stream delay, you might still, unintentionally, spoil a teams general tactics.

I agree that it would give tje stream a highly proffesional touch, but what about playing a selected sound clip after the game? A clip that have been approved by the team which convo it was taken from.

- The three druid/monk ruling. I can see why 3 monks would be interesting. But as earlier mentioned, druids are just way too good @19. And my guess is that, by trying to open up the roster possibilities for the competing teams, you're actually doing the exact opposite.

- Lastly the 13 sp to bracer enchants... Just ban them...

I have faith in the TC commitee (basically Muskies team + Conq and Linden) to make the right decisions, and I'm fucking stoked for this years TC!
 
I believe i already said that it was my fault and that i thought i was putting existing rules that hadn't been mentioned in previous events into words. It was nothing to do with anyone else other than myself.


Still confused as to where this came from. More than 2 of a class was never allowed.

So is this going to stay as is?

3druids but no 2x boomy
3monks but no 2x bm
 
Obviously Muskie and Ephidel are trying to get the rules go their way with the Guardian dream. It's frustrating to see.


Oh good, I was wondering when I was going to get thrown into this.

Blackout already covered it (haven't read everything yet), but no I don't believe either of us did.

It's frustrating to see.



EDIT: Forgot to say, excellent work Blackout/Conq/Lind. You guys are amazing, keep it up. Glad to support you :)
 
Still confused as to where this came from. More than 2 of a class was never allowed.

So is this going to stay as is?

3druids but no 2x boomy
3monks but no 2x bm

Secondly, the rule regarding the 3 Druid and 3 Monk rule was a potential mistake on my part when writing up the post I believe. I was under the impression that people were able to run 3 monks (1BM, 1 WW and 1 MW) and 3 Druids (2x Resto 1 Boomy with or without a rogue / 2x Resto 1 Guardian with or without a rogue / 2x Guardian 1 Resto with no rogue / 1 Resto 1 Guardian 1 Boomy with no rogue) and with it stating in the rules that only 1 boomkin is allowed that those are the only forms of compositions available to both classes. Again, this will have to be spoken about by the committee to make sure that all agree that it is not intended to be that way.

Before changes can be made, even if it may well be a mistake it needs to be spoken about with the committee before a change can be finalized. It's the system that has been put in place and the committee will diligently abide by it.
 
Before changes can be made, even if it may well be a mistake it needs to be spoken about with the committee before a change can be finalized. It's the system that has been put in place and the committee will diligently abide by it.

i mean i think its an interesting addition and dont mind im just hoping to have clarification soon
 
i mean i think its an interesting addition and dont mind im just hoping to have clarification soon
After all of the uproar of it, after putting some further thought into it myself i personally feel that it is a very interesting change indeed. However i do feel that this close to the date of the actual cup changing such things that can potentially impact the meta is a risky move to make and thus is why the decision should be revised.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top