I know people are hating on PING for some of the decisions we made during this tournament, but there is a very clear reason why we chose to make those decisions.
Imagine Zeiren was unable to play those games, or if Grizzle had been hit off, and they were literally unable to play a 10v10 because they simply didnt have enough people on their roster, do you let them sub out of their team? PING made the decision to uphold the rules as they were written because we were cognizant of the impact it could have on the rest of the tournament. We were making a statement that rules are rules, and if we let EBLG or AE slide, who's to say WFS,JCM,SR,GSC etc couldn't do the same. We were literally trying to prevent the controversy of what is happening now. We also stated we would wait all night to play AE/EBLG with their full roster. Same thing with Harvest.
Also, the GSC thing was a clear exploit (which is in the rules), im not going to reply to any arguments here about wether or not it was, or really anything about that situation but Myrm, you should have made a ruling in 5 minutes instead of having a conversation with us for an hour or whatever it was. It was draining for all of us.
I had words with some members of the community who thought that it wasn't an exploit, or at the very least was "grey area" and my position on that is this; if you think we are scummy twinks because we dont let teams sub outside their roster, take a look at the other teams(yes, teams) in the community who were willing to hide VERY questionable strategies from the community to cheese the **** out of some games and pull a win, undermining the tournament, the community, and the other teams. ANYTHING grey area that I was doing in regards to jumps was brought out in the open far in advance of the twink cup, and rules were decided, and what i was doing was explicitly said to be allowed. You can go back and look at my post and see where i said that i did it to try and bring it to the attention of the community. Multiple teams were aware of this hearthstone deltion "strategy", and were planning to use it. Nobody brought it up.
I really am disappointed with the lack of honour and legitimacy some teams had coming into this tournament, in my opinion, everyone should be on a fair playing field. Your wins should come from strategic movement, composition, or coordination, not opening your ******* gm tab. I'd also like to say this, apart from some random toy dropping from SR, they were one of the most respectable teams in the tournament when it came to the rules, to my knowledge. As far as I know, they are one of the few teams who weren't ready to pull out an exploit in a back against the wall situation.
To those saying what was done didnt have an impact on the game? Sure it did, our gauntlet was 'broken' and we were forced to regroup after a wipe instead of just sending our team out again. there was LITERALLY no way we could have lost that game in the gauntlet situation, we could have had another attempt at breaking it, and it likely could have been successful.
Oh, and about the Ele force on the Sader swapping? Here are the rules HB,Pizza, and I wrote out months ago. It isn't my fault the rules committee ****** up on being clear, JrBigChief was not breaking ANY RULES, when this was all discussed ages ago and people were CLEARLY AWARE that you were able to swap from Sader to Ele. Go look at HB's podcast covering the topic.
"-*THIS RULE APPLIES TO ARMS WARRIORS*
Weapon enchant buff stacking. You are not allowed to swap from crusader to landslide, landslide to crusader, crusader to crusader or landslide to landslide. If any of these procs overlap, or any stacking of 2 or more proc buffs, you will forfeit the game. "
SO TO ALL THOSE GIVING **** TO PING
**** you
P.S. I have love for GSC, I think they beat us mid when no other team really seemed like they could. Eu love, all that ****, think you guys have some dope players but its ****** this happened and its really a statement about the community overall, not just you guys.