0.0Prot paladin is pretty insane too. With WoD gear (including Veteran's Gloves - 3 agil) and a crusader proc I healed 3.5k and hit over 1k. While it is sort of proc dependent it has the heals to survive waiting.
Prot paladin is pretty insane too. With WoD gear (including Veteran's Gloves - 3 agil) and a crusader proc I healed 3.5k and hit over 1k. While it is sort of proc dependent it has the heals to survive waiting.
It was not in a BG.How did you get a sader proc in a BG?
My 19 hunt got hit by a 10 arms warrior for 980, unsure which attack it was cause didnt check combat log but yeah. They hit HARDTry out Warrior. I felt a bit iffy about it at first since the damage flow is much different than WoD. You'll notice you rage starve a lot more now. But your hits. .. holy poop you hit like a truck. Even level 10 discs can't keep up with your hits. And beating a Fotm in 1v1 puts Warriors in a pretty good place of you ask me. Although our survivability in frontlining has diminished a lot and we do depend on healers quite a bit.
Then it does not matter nor count.It was not in a BG.
The singular problem with Disc is that Blizz reduced the CD of PWS. If it still had it's long ass CD with Forbearance attached like before they wouldn't be OP right now. I mean come on at 10 my CD is 4.33s and it Crits for over 1700. That said I'm not gonna complain and ride it until the almighty Nerf bat hits, which it will likely before Legion drops.
Healers have been op at 10 for quite some time going back to cata days even, obviously this changed with the level scaling when it was added for bgs. But 10s are more or less back to its former glory. Lots of the classes at 10 do more then what a 19 does in terms of damage and healing.Disc would be op even if they completely removed PWS. They can spam plea to heal themselves every second.
Healers have been op at 10 for quite some time going back to cata days even, obviously this changed with the level scaling when it was added for bgs. But 10s are more or less back to its former glory. Lots of the classes at 10 do more then what a 19 does in terms of damage and healing.
If I want to stack a premade to win i'd go with a 5 man 10s team over 19s any day. They are stronger.
the only 10s worth noting are disc priests. stop acting like 10s are restored to their former glory. all this does is make it seem like there's competitiveness among 10s when in fact a 10 disc priest would roll anything else at 10 or 19.
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/character/zangarmarsh/opekqt/advancedTry out Warrior. I felt a bit iffy about it at first since the damage flow is much different than WoD. You'll notice you rage starve a lot more now. But your hits. .. holy poop you hit like a truck. Even level 10 discs can't keep up with your hits. And beating a Fotm in 1v1 puts Warriors in a pretty good place of you ask me. Although our survivability in frontlining has diminished a lot and we do depend on healers quite a bit.
Warriors, spriest, and boomkin are also very strong at 10. Most of the healers and locks are probably in a good place as well. Give it a few weeks as people try things out (at both 10 and 19) before saying its only disc priests.
i think you're misunderstanding me. are 10 warrs/booms good against everything the general community? sure. is there anything comparable to a 10 priest? no. no level 10 boomkin is getting anywhere close to killing a 10 priest. zero counters, no competitiveness. 100% unfun.
stop using the fucking 60 int buffHard gameplay.