US Should double Boomkin be banned in Warsong?

[Sponsor]

Yeah because 10 ferals sounds fun, idiot

Think about it. Would 10 stealthies really be good in mid? With no heals?

 

[Bacon]

Think about it. Would 10 stealthies really be good in mid? With no heals?

It would be stupid as fck, The rules are fine as is. If it's not fking broken why the fk are we trying to fix it.

 

[Bacon]

-Better mobility
-Better MELEE burst
-Offheals
-The ability to FC

Basically listed a resto druid's qualities while complaining about balanced druids, The only difference between resto and balance is that you take damage for weaker fcing, it's fine tbh

 

[Darkchewie]

The next step should be creating a committee to take a look at the current rules and decide what is best going forward, as time is of the essence.

I dont know who should go about creating it but hopefully as a community we can agree on people who will put the future of 19s before any personal bias.

 

[Yndigo]

I kind of get the arguments against double boomkin, even though most of it seems to come from Resto druid FCs and Rogues who gets pushed out of the equation by running double boomkin. But if double boomkin gets banned there's just going to pop up another "op" comp that lesser teams won't understand how to run/how to counter. That's just the reality of competitive gaming.

If the rules are going to change a committee needs to be assembled fast and if deemed necessary change the rules within a week to give the competing teams the appropiate amount of time to adapt and rework their strategy come TC.

Personally I say leave it as it is, since double boomkin gives teams a choice wether to run a resto druid FC or double boomkin both which are perfectly viable.


TL;DR If you're gonna change something do it quick otherwise leave it. Changes right before a major tournament is just dumb as shit.

 

[danny glover]

Restriction cup 2016 hype

 

[Mvq]

I kind of get the arguments against double boomkin, even though most of it seems to come from Resto druid FCs and Rogues who gets pushed out of the equation by running double boomkin. But if double boomkin gets banned there's just going to pop up another "op" comp that lesser teams won't understand how to run/how to counter. That's just the reality of competitive gaming.

If the rules are going to change a committee needs to be assembled fast and if deemed necessary change the rules within a week to give the competing teams the appropiate amount of time to adapt and rework their strategy come TC.

Personally I say leave it as it is, since double boomkin gives teams a choice wether to run a resto druid FC or double boomkin both which are perfectly viable.


TL;DR If you're gonna change something do it quick otherwise leave it. Changes right before a major tournament is just dumb as shit.

Most people would argue that there isn't diversity in comps as Double Boomkin forces teams to run that comp as it's blowing every other comp out of the waters.

 

[Yndigo]

Most people would argue that there isn't diversity in comps as Double Boomkin forces teams to run that comp as it's blowing every other comp out of the waters.

And on what grounds are you basing that double boomkin is "blowing every other comp out of the water" on?

 

[Mvq]

And on what grounds are you basing that double boomkin is "blowing every other comp out of the water" on?

It's the best comp?

 

[Yndigo]

It's the best comp?

Solid argument.

 

[Bacon]

If you can't play it, Ban it.

 

[Mvq]

Solid argument.

Everyone's playing DBoomkin. It's a common fact.

 

[Yndigo]

Everyone's playing DBoomkin. It's a common fact.

And that proves that double boomkin is superiour or that people don't feel like innovating like HIA did?

 

[Mvq]

And that proves that double boomkin is superiour or that people don't feel like innovating like HIA did?

How do you know people aren't trying to figure out counters?

 

[Yndigo]

How do you know people aren't trying to figure out counters?

I know for a fact that people are figuring out counters, which makes banning double boomkin even more pointless.

 

[Dorigon]

The obvious answer here is to allow two boomkins while also allowing the option of a resto/guardian FC.

 

[Yndigo]

The obvious answer here is to allow two boomkins while also allowing the option of a resto/guardian FC.

Exactly.

 

[Dorigon]

If you want diversity in comps, there is no reason taking two boomkins should limit using a resto/guardian druid in a completely different role. This would allow for a higher degree of 'rock paper scissors'. Seriously, being pigeonholed into running hunter FCs due to comp restrictions sounds pretty goofy.

 

[(Hass)]

If you have a problem with a certain player and the class he/she is playing.. just hit them off? Problem solved...

 

[Ridwane]

People against double boomkin must have terrible FC...