Reincorporating All Account Types In The 20-29 Bracket Into One Forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
Didn't they remove that thing like 2 and a half years ago?

huh, i guess i need to pay attention to the in-game calender more often then, didn't know that they took it down.

For all your random non-bracket specific needs, TI's gotya covered - General Twinks Section General Twinks Section

looks like we're looking at different pictures then of the same thing then, one must be zoomed in and the other is zoomed out.
 
I don't like this even in the slighest. It's going to be an unorganized mess with the separate factions constantly bickering. Unfortunately, it will likely happen anyway. Kincaid is really good about forcing his own will and agenda upon others. If you don't believe me, take a look at how he forced his Wil and essentially ostracized me from the F2P community over helping people achieve AGMs with my 90 in the summer of 2011.

No 90s in cata :)
 
AlbinoCow I'm sorry, I'm not sure what it is that you feel has not been addressed. I said that many of you had made some very good points about organization and that I had come to agree.

Since the conversation is still ongoing in this thread, would you guys like me to just add a poll of the various options to this thread?

Yea, make the official poll, with every viable option listed. People will then feel heard, and people can see how the hive of twinkinfo is feeling. Even start the poll in a new thread, as this one is listed in the 20-29 section, which means the poll tag won't show in the f2p section. And there is 1000% more activity in the f2p section, so I think the new poll needs to be made in the f2p section.

This thread has too many back and forth discussions that can sway opinion. Can you make a poll in a new thread, with no discussion, just the poll and your first comment giving instruction, that links to this thread for people to discuss the options.

And from there you guys can make the official decision, which doesn't have to follow the result of the poll, but which can use the results to help you decide what sort of dircetion would probably satisfy the most people, for the overall good.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Kincaide doesn't feel there is enough to do so he merged the two brackets with the most bickering so he could do some moderating.
 
This is going over about as smoothly as the foundation of the State of Israel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yea, make the official poll, with every viable option listed.

Truly every viable option?

So:

20-29 single forum

20 and 21-29 two forums

F2p, vet, 21-29 three forums

Pure f2p, f2p who got p2p help, linked f2p, f2p restricted p2p, vet, 21-29. Six forums

Pure f2p, f2p who got p2p help, linked f2p, f2p restricted p2p, vet, 21-29. Each further broken into subforum based on region, role, armor type, primary stat, class, spec, faction, and character race
 
Pure f2p, f2p who got p2p help, linked f2p, f2p restricted p2p, vet, 21-29. Each further broken into subforum based on region, role, armor type, primary stat, class, spec, faction, and character race 

Why stop there?

Further segregation should include professions, weapons, skin colour, face selection, hair style/colour, accessories, achievement points, time played, statistics, number of consonants in character name...

How else will I ensure my speshulsnoflakestatus

All in favour?
 
Truly every viable option?

So:

20-29 single forum

20 and 21-29 two forums

F2p, vet, 21-29 three forums

Pure f2p, f2p who got p2p help, linked f2p, f2p restricted p2p, vet, 21-29. Six forums

Pure f2p, f2p who got p2p help, linked f2p, f2p restricted p2p, vet, 21-29. Each further broken into subforum based on region, role, armor type, primary stat, class, spec, faction, and character race 

Viable from a forum organizing perspective.
Not from every possible difference there is.
Your last two options are definitely not viable for forum like twinkinfo.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Viable from a forum organizing perspective.
Not from every possible difference there is.

Ok, fair enough. Please define viable in this circumstance.

"Viable - capable of working successfully; feasible.
"the proposed investment was economically viable"
synonyms:feasible, workable, practicable, practical, usable, possible, realistic, achievable, attainable, realizable; informaldoable
"it doesn't sound like a viable solution"
antonyms:impractical"

I think that would be a matter of opinion and perspective (meaning member vs. admin/mod.
 
Do you guys want to have a poll about what poll options the poll should have?

This is just humor to lighten the mood, of course.
 
Ok, fair enough. Please define viable in this circumstance.

"Viable - capable of working successfully; feasible.
"the proposed investment was economically viable"
synonyms:feasible, workable, practicable, practical, usable, possible, realistic, achievable, attainable, realizable; informaldoable
"it doesn't sound like a viable solution"
antonyms:impractical"

I think that would be a matter of opinion and perspective (meaning member vs. admin/mod.
ok...
Viable:
-Botany: (of a seed or spore) able to germinate.

That is what I am talking about.

;)

Seriously though: Viable - capable of working successfully.
The moderation of this site and congregation of a community won't work successfully with such a small community split into 6 or more communities. The site will become cluttered with mess. Moderation will become more difficult as the mods have to visit 6 times as many different forums to check on them. The time consuming cost of adding that many new forums is not worth the gain you get from being split up that much.
 
My popcorn is ready.
 
Do you guys want to have a poll about what poll options the poll should have?

This is just humor to lighten the mood, of course.
In order to put an end to this, let's set up a committee to determine the criteria of the poll.
 
Do you guys want to have a poll about what poll options the poll should have?

This is just humor to lighten the mood, of course.

Start with every remotely feasible option you can imagine and every 24 hours remove one option until you're down to 4 options. New options could be added in the early stages.
 
In order to put an end to this, let's set up a committee to determine the criteria of the poll.

Just to be safe, it should be two separate committees. One could be based on say... bracket population, and the other with a static 2 members of each community. I think you're on to something.
 
Just to be safe, it should be two separate committees. One could be based on say... bracket population, and the other with a static 2 members of each community. I think you're on to something.
Committees: where good intentions go to die.
 
ok...
Viable:
-Botany: (of a seed or spore) able to germinate.

That is what I am talking about.

;)

Seriously though: Viable - capable of working successfully.
The moderation of this site and congregation of a community won't work successfully with such a small community split into 6 or more communities. The site will become cluttered with mess. Moderation will become more difficult as the mods have to visit 6 times as many different forums to check on them. The time consuming cost of adding that many new forums is not worth the gain you get from being split up that much.

Yes, my last 2 (especially the last one) are retarded. I was using sarcastic humor to illustrate how I feel about these sort of retarded arguments that have been going on for years. 20 vs 24, pure f2p vs linked or whatever?, 20 vs 29, new 29 vs OG 29 and now f2p vs vet.
 
All joking aside, if I do put "unlikely" options on a poll, they just won't get any votes, so no real harm done. It's not like we're wasting paper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top