Reincorporating All Account Types In The 20-29 Bracket Into One Forum

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do it, go full monty.
I eagerly await clicking that vote button :D
dontgetcrazy.gif
 
Regardless if you have separate sections/sub forums for pure f2ps, vet f2ps, vet accounts, blah de blah. Your going to run into those people who will always post in the 20-29 section just purely because; the character(s) they have fit that forum despite being under f2p restrictions.

Logical solutions for the Staff.

1) Merge everything together and add additional beginning tags like [US] and [EU] but have it for [PURE], [VET] and such
2) Merge everything together and have a F2P and Vet sub forum within the 20-29 section
3) Create additional sections for what is needed and moderate them/have people report threads that are in the wrong section

There is really no need for all of this bull and drama. As I recall before Vet F2P was available numerous 20's abused Blizzard to be basically what a Vet F2P is now. We are all stuck with each other, F2P, Enchanted F2P, 24, 28, 29. We are all brothers and sisters in the Gulch and Basin. Stop all this useless bickering and lets move on with our lives.

Imagine for a moment, if you will a forum where no one complains. Everyone is all hug and carebear and its all coombya. Well that will never happen because; everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I remember being complained and BTFO'd at by certain people in numerous other brackets because; of being one of those people who like to play differently than the rest.


CIHC
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In order to put an end to this, let's set up a committee to determine the criteria of the poll.

I'm alright with this as long as there's a poll to decide on the committee members.


On topic though, I think merging the f2p and 20-29 sections on TI has potential. Veteran accounts have blurred the lines between p2p, f2p, 20 and 29. Separating 20 and 21-29 like [MENTION=6229]Bizarre[/MENTION] and [MENTION=18568]Hashbrowns[/MENTION] recommended kinda leaves fully twinked veteran 20s in a weird spot where they'll have to deal with casual hostility from the "pure f2p" population and might get better information from more experienced p2p twinkers in the 29 section. If the f2p community can overcome this to accept veteran 20s, I don't see why we need to divide the general discussion in the bracket anymore.

Combining them would take some work, but it could be worth it in the long run. I think some sort of thread tagging would help (or asking players to identify targeted threads on their own with a [F2P] [Vet] or [29]). Separate rate a twink or guide sections are an option, but could be too cluttered at the top of the page. If kindly asking people to stop rehashing the same useless arguments over whether or not they waste $15 a month to play this bracket doesn't work, we might need some extra moderation for a little while.

The bracket's almost 4 years old, I think it's about time to accept that there are going to be both f2ps and p2ps in it. IMO it's worth at least giving the unified forum section a test run. If it turns out too cluttered or hostile to be constructive, then we can always change it back.
 
It's done, the poll is created.

http://www.twinkinfo.com/forums/f40/big-poll-65008/

If you guys don't mind, again this is just to keep the conversation concentrated in one place, I'm going to go ahead and close this thread and ask that you continue discussing on that one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Top