Perfect Premade Setup.

kablam said:
As an O sham its quite easy to spam purge and still do your job correctly. And a pally would never be on a decent premade team's Offense. There are so many other classes to take over it.



That isn't necessarily true, sir...Like I've stated previously paladins provide excellent utility and dps. Most paladins are just awful, so people don't think they would be viable.
 
Reflexes said:



I'll see your viable and raise you one rogue offhand thread.
 
Kore nametooshort said:
D druid - uh lol, FC set

D Mage - uh lol, CC set

D shaman - more mana and stam than O, can sacrifice abit of hit and SP

D priest - more stam and SP than O.



Holy Pal instead of D Sham is other option
 
Just to join the discussion, a rogue in O is viable, no class can(or at least could) put out as much dmg in a short amount of time, as the rogue. Might be what we call Burst dmg today :O



Though the rogue have been weakened looking at buffs other classes have gained. I'd say a clever rogue, as Falaris stated, is one of the best DPS classes to have in an O. As ofc, it can't do shit when alone. But when it's time for the serious nukedown, a rogue comes in bloody handy :)



Yes it's important to "drain" the D, but you still need that burst to actually take the FC down.
 
There is no "perfect" premade setup, there will ALWAYS be a counter..



But in terms of my most desired premade set up, in which I find to be most well rounded:



O:

Warrior

Priest

Shaman

Hunter

Hunter

Warlock



D:

Druid

Mage

Priest

Shaman
 
rogue isnt on o for dps, its there for interupts and fucking up heals so warr and hunter can do their job killing efc.
 
Grunge said:
rogue isnt on o for dps, its there for interupts and fucking up heals so warr and hunter can do their job killing efc.



Hunters primary roll should be hard slow/cc then dps.



Hunters that don't utilize their other moves and simply dps are bayud.







Back on topic, rogues can be somewhat viable. The problem is in warsong w/ open space, a good mage WILL lock down a rogue. That's a fact-so for a rogue to work in wsg they're going to need to have a very good understanding of los



And then you ask yourself, why am I not using a warrior/shaman
 
Because rogues do more damage in the windows when theyre actually on a target. As Ive said, a smart rogue can anticipate when theres going to be an attack window, and use his cooldowns accordingly. The people in this thread theorycrafting that rogues are completely unviable just dont really play with good rogues tbh, or play on good teams.
 
Stealthbot said:
Ironic coming from some1 who last premaded with their rogue pre travelform gw n cheeta.





If u even did then



Thats funny, I did a premade about an hour and a half ago, literally just logged on goofing around and got invited when they were a man down. FYI, there were 2 flag returns the entire game. I had both.
 
On a somewhat related note, I absolutely love the hypocrisy of giving me a warning/ban for having a discussion that differs from a mod, but when 4-5 people constantly badger me about my points of view on a 19 premade not a word is said to them. What were you saying Rayu about me trying to figure out why I got banned? Im still missing that reason I guess. Apparently we'll have to go with 'its ok to have disagreements, just dont disagree with the Moderator'.
 
Lol u just proved my point

u were offered an invite cause they were a man down. And getting 2 returns gratz bro majority of ppl scroll click nowday so no big feat bro



wat guilds did u premade with...



Oh n dunno wat priest above me is trying to say
 
Stealthbot said:
Lol u just proved my point

u were offered an invite cause they were a man down. And getting 2 returns gratz bro majority of ppl scroll click nowday so no big feat bro



wat guilds did u premade with...



Oh n dunno wat priest above me is trying to say



I think he's trying to say youre a nobody. Also, your posts indicate an intelligence on the level of someone from a Geico commercial. Also, I dont scroll click, so yeah a nonscroll clicking rogue got both returns in the first premade he played in in 3-4 months.
 
Falaris, your ban was justified. In fact its posts like the one above this that vindicate it.



Anywho, more on topic. I would love to try a 4x Druid defense. Stack the FC up with nature resistance and subtlety and i reckon you can get a 67% (15NR on cloak, 2xrings and magic resistance pot) chance of purge failing. Assuming that the O is wise to this and has brought 2 or 3 shamans then their damage output will fall significantly if they have 3 players spamming purge constantly. Also this would mean that they would be crutching on windshear as their primary interupts, assuming they want a hunter or two and a priest, which would have 37% failure chance (again, the healing druids would have NR). It shouldnt suffer too much from losing a mage shaman ans priest since there would be 4 sets of roots flying about thus mage isnt so necessary; CC isnt a problem, therefore friendly dispell isnt so necessary; and the shaman would be out healed.

I would love to try this, as i reckon it would be a pretty fine kiting D and druids heal good. Droods are better than shamans imo, especially when purge is less of a problem. the lack of huge heals would be compensated for the near constant hots and glyph of rejuv.
 
Falaris said:
Because rogues do more damage in the windows when theyre actually on a target. As Ive said, a smart rogue can anticipate when theres going to be an attack window, and use his cooldowns accordingly. The people in this thread theorycrafting that rogues are completely unviable just dont really play with good rogues tbh, or play on good teams.



Yeah! Agreed. The sole purpose of returning a flag is at set time, you are supposed to outdps the healing done on the target. This usually happens allot faster if timed correct, thus a rogue is way better than a "draining" class. Rogue with all CD's will do the dmg he needs in those 6-10 seconds that is needed for the well timed Takedown!



Not saying it's easy to take efc down, just when the time is right for the nukedown, you'll want to have that rogue!
 
Rofl u dunno who i am cause i dont associate with bads like urself and hes from eu so i cant be bothered. 1st premade in 3months gratz bro!!!



Keep it up





Reeto911-
 
Kore nametooshort said:
Falaris, your ban was justified. In fact its posts like the one above this that vindicate it.



Anywho, more on topic. I would love to try a 4x Druid defense. Stack the FC up with nature resistance and subtlety and i reckon you can get a 67% (15NR on cloak, 2xrings and magic resistance pot) chance of purge failing. Assuming that the O is wise to this and has brought 2 or 3 shamans then their damage output will fall significantly if they have 3 players spamming purge constantly. Also this would mean that they would be crutching on windshear as their primary interupts, assuming they want a hunter or two and a priest, which would have 37% failure chance (again, the healing druids would have NR). It shouldnt suffer too much from losing a mage shaman ans priest since there would be 4 sets of roots flying about thus mage isnt so necessary; CC isnt a problem, therefore friendly dispell isnt so necessary; and the shaman would be out healed.

I would love to try this, as i reckon it would be a pretty fine kiting D and druids heal good. Droods are better than shamans imo, especially when purge is less of a problem. the lack of huge heals would be compensated for the near constant hots and glyph of rejuv.



http://www.twinkinfo.com/forums/20-29-bracket/6923-soloing-gnomeregan-29-warr.html



An entire 8 page thread of people trolling the OP for posting a vid (and even a mod insulting the people who are trolling, thereby trolling himself)



http://www.twinkinfo.com/forums/30-39-bracket/11502-can-someone-give-me-list-all-green-lens.html



Five pages of people insulting each other back and forth, cussing each other out, basically just trolling each other. No mod responses whatsoever.



http://www.twinkinfo.com/forums/30-39-bracket/11418-some-cata-talent-tree-uppdates.html



Very first response to the OP is 'Your (lol) an idiot if you believe this'. It continues with 5 pages of a couple people giving this guy shit because they dont believe that MMO-champion is an accurate source of information.



http://www.twinkinfo.com/forums/10-19-bracket/11289-perfect-premade-setup.html



Hey guess what.... its THIS THREAD, where we have such platinum hits as:



Lol falis u do realise natures grasp has 3 charges now...



If u honstly think u could stay on a fc with a shammy mage hunta D or anything like that for more then like 5 secs ur wrong. No mater how skilled u r u aint gonna stay on him so u can stop psting crap about bad rouge if u cant stay on the efc lol no idea mate



Rofl u dunno who i am cause i dont associate with bads like urself and hes from eu so i cant be bothered. 1st premade in 3months gratz bro!!!



Keep it up





Reeto911-



This entire forum is full of people arguing/trolling with each other. Its no shock that one of the people calling me an idiot for saying rogues were viable was one of the 2 people saying my ban was justified. The only reason it was 'justified' was because I had an opinion that differed from one of a Moderator, it had NOTHING to do with me trolling, or DEFINITELY without me trolling more than anyone else. So wait, a ban is justified if you RESPOND to someone insulting you while typing like a mouthbreather, when in reality you should always just ignore the insults people throw your way so YOU dont get in trouble???
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top