Paris Terrorist Attack

Explosions have been heard during France-Germany soccer game
 
I feel like the US govt is constantly looking for reasons to wage war with the Middle East. Well they might have just gotten their reason, regardless of the fact this didn't even happen here. I'll wait and see, though.
 
I feel like the US govt is constantly looking for reasons to wage war with the Middle East. Well they might have just gotten their reason, regardless of the fact this didn't even happen here. I'll wait and see, though.

I implore the moderators to remove ALL off topic posts in this thread before it gets out of hand. Including this one if you like. This thread is not the place for immaturity.
 
Generalize an entire group of people as terrorists, what could possibly go wrong

I'd say that Muslims have done more than enough to justify such generalizations. Islam is not a religion, it's an ideology that should be banned just like Nazism is. But politically correct Europe is too afraid to name things for what they are.

This is what? 3rd or 4th terrorist act in France this year? And mr Hollande comes out and says" hurr durr we got things under control and we'll make sure that this won't happen again derp".
 
God bless the souls of the dead and a speedy recovery for the injured.

11/13/2015 will be added to the dates that will be remembered, sadly.
 
I'd say that Muslims have done more than enough to justify such generalizations. Islam is not a religion, it's an ideology that should be banned just like Nazism is. But politically correct Europe is too afraid to name things for what they are.

This is what? 3rd or 4th terrorist act in France this year? And mr Hollande comes out and says" hurr durr we got things under control and we'll make sure that this won't happen again derp".

Correction....

Radical Muslins....
Why do you think America has been at war with them for two decades?
 
Correction....

Radical Muslins....
Why do you think America has been at war with them for two decades?

You mean Obama who prematurely pulled the troops from Iraq to appease the public and subsequently allowed ISIS to form? Then backed "moderate opposition" against Assad with training and equipment that eventually ended up strengthening ISIS militants?
 
Saw this on a phone app alert of the current headlining news @ some time yesterday

i was like damn, 153 people... but it was explosions and gunshots. THANK FUCK. While everyone in the media was busy making commotion on people who got shot/exploded in Paris, the same # of people died in africa but from way more torturous ways.

another trayvon, people choosing to focus on something because the media directs their attention entirely... way more horrible incidences of the worst suffering ever are happening right now & potentially even at the same time as these tragedies happened, that aren't being talked about at the top of the news, this one was just possible to get a quick report out on.

RIP and best of luck to all families & anyone at all who lost people in this, my condolences, but reality yo..
 
I'd say that Muslims have done more than enough to justify such generalizations. Islam is not a religion, it's an ideology that should be banned just like Nazism is. But politically correct Europe is too afraid to name things for what they are.

This is what? 3rd or 4th terrorist act in France this year? And mr Hollande comes out and says" hurr durr we got things under control and we'll make sure that this won't happen again derp".

There are 1.6 billion muslims in the world, there probably aren't any more than 50,0000 ISIS members. So you're going to ban an ideology that nearly 1/4th of the world follows because 0.003% are connected to ISIS?
 
There are 1.6 billion muslims in the world, there probably aren't any more than 50,0000 ISIS members. So you're going to ban an ideology that nearly 1/4th of the world follows because 0.003% are connected to ISIS?

Remind me how many of those 1.6 billion stood up against what their fellow believers are doing? I seem to recall them protesting quite avidly over Muhammad caricatures. Not quite as vocal about honor killings or marriages with children.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Remind me how many of those 1.6 billion stood up against what their fellow believers are doing? I seem to recall them protesting quite vividly over Muhammad caricatures. Not quite as vocal about honor killings or marriages with children.

Why should another muslim have to apologize for something they didn't do? And maybe you are blinded by hate but MANY MANY muslims do come out and condemn the actions of extremists.
 
The best thing to do in this thread is to ignore the off topic posts and posters. For they will only draw us away from the real subject we should we should be discussing. If you wish to discuss something else, start another thread on that subject.

Everyone should keep France and Parisians in particular in their thoughts these next few days. They will surely need it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Violence begets violence.
Same seems to hold true for idiocy.
Stop the hate... and stop spewing out moronic regurgitated rhetoric.
 
I have some understanding for ISIS.
Assad ban all dissidenters so only extremist can survive.
(so are China government, Many Chinese people hate all Muslim and support government because of fear, of course CCP encourage these discrimination. )
We have to choose between Assad, ISIS and Al-Qaida in Syrian, but why there is no other choice?

What ISIS do is connected to Islam, as what Mao did is connected to communism.
Tolerance doesn't deny difference between good and evil, everyone should believe his/her faith is the best.
There are good faith and evil faith, good Islam and evil Islam, but in general Islam is a bit evil.
Yeah, MANY MANY muslims do come out and condemn/fight against extremists,
but remember, MANY MANY MORE communists killed by other communists, and that never justfied communism.

WEIRD=Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democracy
Some people are too WEIRD to accept the truth of this world.
ISIS is more tolerant, more merciful and more kindhearted than CCP in 1930s or 1970s, and you know what Nixon do……
Well, it seems 100 death in Paris is far more important than 10,000 death in middle east or Asia
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have relatives in Paris and it is a tragedy that the people in France had to go through. One of the things people don't realize is that western culture is frowned upon in many middle eastern places, yet Muslims will gladly flee to Western civilizations and most will create havoc on the host nation they "seek refuge in". In reality, they are doing hijrah, which is their religious belief to flood non Muslim nations through "immigration" (illegal or not) and have as much kids with natives in that country so that in 60+ Years that nation would gladly accept Islam (through shariah law)due to forced assimilation and if anyone tries to shut it down they will be called islamaphobic,racist and shunned for not accepting multiculturalism(a failed experiment). In the UK the natives there are now the minority and violence there is caused just about 100% by Muslims, heck, Muhammad is the most common name now in the UK. The question people should be asking is, why are we accepting people from 3rd world countries into a great society when these refugees(most of them invaders from Syria) can not benefit their own country? Why are Europeans not fleeing by the hundreds of thousands to go into the Middle East to live there? I think most of us know the reason why and it's obvious, they want to spread their influence and dominate the world by flooding every country and spreading Islam, after all, that is what their religion teaches.

Also, the more countries Islamists flee to, and influence, the easier it is to force other countries to accept their values as they can then become in positions of power to force their views down people's throats. Look at Sweden, Germany, Merkel the prime minister of Germany is accepting multiculturalism by the masses and Muslims are swiftly taking over by having 22 kids while Germans only have 2. Muslims know that if they can't defeat countries through an actual war, their last resort will be through "Hijrah", people need to wake up and understand how dangerous this religion is. The crusaders fought against Islam, and just about every other country hundreds of years ago had to defend themselves from Islamic extremism

My thoughts and prayers go out to those who were affected in France and Lebanon and Kenya.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There are 1.6 billion muslims in the world, there probably aren't any more than 50,0000 ISIS members. So you're going to ban an ideology that nearly 1/4th of the world follows because 0.003% are connected to ISIS?

If 5 Muslims could take out almost 300 people in Paris and tens of thousands of people on 9/11, then 0.003% is too great of a number to tolerate such an extreme ideology formed by a perverted prophet. If a religion has that much of a radical influence on people, that they are willing to kill in the name of their religion, then what are the good Muslims doing to stop the radicals?
 
I have some understanding for ISIS.
Assad ban all dissidenters so only extremist can survive.
(so are China government, Many Chinese people hate all Muslim and support government because of fear, of course CCP encourage these discrimination. )
We have to choose between Assad, ISIS and Al-Qaida in Syrian, but why there is no other choice?

What ISIS do is connected to Islam, as what Mao did is connected to communism.
Tolerance doesn't deny difference between good and evil, everyone should believe his/her faith is the best.
There are good faith and evil faith, good Islam and evil Islam, but in general Islam is a bit evil.
Yeah, MANY MANY muslims do come out and condemn/fight against extremists,
but remember, MANY MANY MORE communists killed by other communists, and that never justfied communism.

WEIRD=Western Educated Industrialized Rich Democracy
Some people are too WEIRD to accept the truth of this world.
ISIS is more tolerant, more merciful and more kindhearted than CCP in 1930s or 1970s, and you know what Nixon do……
Well, it seems 100 death in Paris is far more important than 10,000 death in middle east or Asia

I don't know why you would call ISIS kindhearted when they have declared war on all of Europe and Chrsitianity (slaying hundreds of thousands even from the medieval times)... You do realize that their plan is to carry out the biggest racial genocide in Europe, and they use their "religion" as a means of doing so. Which in turn gives good Muslims a bad name but what are the good Muslims doing about it? Can't be much because these attacks are carried out on even their own people which means their religion isn't even compatable with their own people.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't know why you would call ISIS kindhearted when they have declared war on all of Europe and Chrsitianity (slaying hundreds of thousands even from the medieval times)... You do realize that their plan is to carry out the biggest racial genocide in Europe, and they use their "religion" as a means of doing so. Which in turn gives good Muslims a bad name but what are the good Muslims doing about it? Can't be much because these attacks are carried out on even their own people which means their religion isn't even compatable with their own people.

ISIS are horrible terrorists, but they are kindhearted when compared with CCP before 1978.
Millions of people were killed, tortured or raped in culture revolution and other 1000 movement, Mao support infamous Khmer Rouge which massacre 1/3 of population in Cambodia……Do you know what Nixon do? You can guess.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top