Phrontistery
i was making waves u was surfing in 'em
11/13
never baguette
never baguette
dunno about number of isis members, but 30% of all muslims are radical and wants to kill the infidelsThere are 1.6 billion muslims in the world, there probably aren't any more than 50,0000 ISIS members. So you're going to ban an ideology that nearly 1/4th of the world follows because 0.003% are connected to ISIS?
dunno about number of isis members, but 30% of all muslims are radical and wants to kill the infidels
ISIS are horrible terrorists, but they are kindhearted when compared with CCP before 1978.
Millions of people were killed, tortured or raped in culture revolution and other 1000 movement, Mao support infamous Khmer Rouge which massacre 1/3 of population in Cambodia……Do you know what Nixon do? You can guess.
270 million Jews killed by Islam, 80 million Hendus killed by Islam, 10 million Buddhists killed by Islam, 60 million Christians killed by Islam, 120 million Africans killed by Islam. This is calculated all throughout history and the war still is being waged. Islam has also ethnically destroyed many races too throughout history.
telletron if the thread is "abhorrent" why post off topic in it?
I created a thread just for posting this sort of stuff. I even posted it above.
This thread is about the attack on Paris, NOT Islam or Muslims.
Everyone, please show some respect for those people that died, including Muslims and Christians.
/cheers
The best way to respond to terrorist acts is not to talk about it.
Sounds harsh, but by giving it media coverage and talking about it everywhere is exactly what the terrorists want.
If you want to further discuss this we can take it to ally's thread but as far as the crusaders go, you can't fault them for fighting against the evil we are currently fighting against. If the crusades never existed you would be living next door to Muslim extremists as we speak. Might want to know why the crusaders intentions to rise up before you assume they just slaughtered extreme Islamists. That's like blaming the US 500 years down the road for defending our boarders against terrorists and callin us radicals for doing so.
Is religious fanaticism somehow viewed to be an exclusively Muslim characteristic? I could be misinterpreting some of the responses in here, but I would like to point out that pretty much every major religion in the world either currently or historically has sought to push it's beliefs (and claims to territory) through violent means.
Buddhist - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism_and_violence
Christian - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_terrorism
Jewish - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jewish_religious_terrorism
Sikh - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalistan_movement#Terrorist_activities
Hindu - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saffron_terror
Secondly, as someone else pointed out, the fanatical Muslim population is a minority of it's followers and it is misleading to portray the entire religion as a violent one. There have been countless protests and marches in various countries that demonstrate the fanatics are but a small fraction of the whole.
Muslims in Europe rally against extremist violence - CBS News
'Not in My Name' campaign by Muslim group surfaces after Paris attacks | abc7.com
Think Muslims Haven’t Condemned ISIS? Think Again - Common Word, Common Lord
Honestly, this thread is just abhorrent.
If you're going to state opinion as facts and falsehoods as truths, you really should work on your power of persuasion... 'cause it ain't working.
You know that Muslims believe in flooding into non Muslim countries to then take them over due to mass immigration and forced assimilation to force their shariah law on people
Stop watching fox news
When will the world get rid of these islamic extremist fucks.
You clearly don't know anything about their religion