Chops
Soccer Dad
no.Just admit that my point of view is right as well. lol which we all know is chops.
no.Just admit that my point of view is right as well. lol which we all know is chops.
let's be real, I know the person making the counter argument supposedly farmed foamspittle for 150 hours with no luck.
I am one of the most establish...
Hmm, where have I heard this kind of rhetoric before?
Did you try any way back machine websites or anything, sometimes those still workJust a "heads-up" to @necroaqua, @Kaxle, @Brihan, @Warglave, @Eleannor, @zazzyfraz, @Winterly, @artonkn, @Yapah, @Dannymcbride, @Swoops, and anyone else who occasionally uses the Blizzard™ Armory database to check if various items "have the potential to upgrade".
It's been shut-down.
For those who may not know... when their server tries to show something that's unavailable/inaccessible/missing, you get a 404 error:
View attachment 13238
...and you simply try-again some other time, hoping that by then it's "back to normal".
However, when Blizzard™ intentionally removes something... you get a 410 error:
View attachment 13239
...and it simply no longer exists online.
What does this mean for us? For the moment, it looks like we no-longer have a convenient way to confirm an item's "upgradability" status. It was fun while it lasted, but hopefully we've all done enough "research" by now that we can manage without it.
...and who knows? Perhaps with all of the recent item-changes, Blizzard™ is actually in the process of "upgrading" the whole database? Only time will tell, I suppose.
Anyway, it seemed relevant to this thread... so there ya' go.
Probably going to be hit or miss, those pages didnt exactly have a lot of trafficDid you try any way back machine websites or anything, sometimes those still work
Did you try any way back machine websites or anything, sometimes those still work
Yeah, it's a waste of time:Probably going to be hit or miss, those pages didnt exactly have a lot of traffic
Not personally, but I know I've seen them epic... (possibly even in this thread).Gloves of Unmitigated Badassery - crying out to drop as epic...
Has anyone been lucky?
Yes Othi - A healer with a brain (Shaman/Monk/Druid/Paladin/Priest) +4 intellect weighs more than +4 vers.... I would take the intellect over verse as it gets scaled down in BGs as Intellect scales up and we all know +1 Stam is only 10HP.
So Chops and Ohti, stop lying to the ppl as choosing 1 over the other is personal pref - because both are BiS now
I'd still argue that staff is better for healers, although only by a fraction.
Healers don't really need more intellect, they already do a lot of healing on their instants/when they can cast. What they do need is the ability to survive multiple arcane missiles being channelled on them or the stuns from paladins and rogues alike.
The 4 intellect won't help them here as much as the 4 vers, 1 stam would.
Shaman and Paladin should always be picking shields anyway.
For casters, I'd vouch that the mainhand and offhand are better. More customisation of stats and higher spellpower options are available. Then again, if I was trying in arena, I'd probably still pick the staff due to the survivability it has over mainhand/offhand.
druids still hit for 75-150 white non crits with foamspittle melees
My mage doesn’t get that damage but my Druid does in reg/boomkin/travelform melees
preachLike i said, the difference is fractional. If anything the best idea would be to have a set of both. MH/OH for when you're at range pumping SS and dotting people up, swapping to the staff with ele force on if they get close as you'll want the survivability/melee damage/spamming Moonfire with ele force procs for most damage.
does it scale to +6 in bgs? I don't think it does but my memory isn't the sharpest.+6 int OH enchant
MH OH is bis no matter what way you look at it
37 int 12 stam 12 vers (+6 int OH enchant) vs 37 int 13 stam 16 vers
6 int vs 1 stam 4v, the only reason to use foam would be for a FC set
+4 at 19/20, +6 at 29 (in bg for 20)does it scale to +6 in bgs? I don't think it does but my memory isn't the sharpest.
you might be confused with +4 to shield.
No sane healer would take 1 stam 4v over 6 intThe argument is that healers heal enough. They don't struggle to top themselves or others in pretty much 1 cast. What they run into most issues with is surviving burst. The 6 intellect won't help them out in those situations as much as the stamina & vers will.
Yes we're splitting hairs, as I said it's fractional. But bis is bis. This only applies to monks, priests and druids mind you.
Our point is that healers are fine and an extra like maybe what, 10hp? To their heals wont mean shit when a hunter is critting for 800+No sane healer would take 1 stam 4v over 6 int