Derpyslave
Veteran
Arms warrior really struggles vs mage, but Fury has a 20 sec cd slow and root removal. Assuming the warrior doesn't open with charge and just runs up to the mage, they can give mage a hard time.
if you're trying to 1v1 a mage on a warrior, you probably arent the kind of person thats really showcasing the class anyway...fury is leaps and bounds more capable vs mage than arms.
I do it all the time and have a very high success rate on my fury warrior. They root, i use bloodrage, they blink, i use charge, they try to poly, i interrupt, then we both wait for cds and see what happens next. I've tried to 1v1 mages as arms and it sucks royally.if you're trying to 1v1 a mage on a warrior, you probably arent the kind of person thats really showcasing the class anyway...
Im not saying its impossible and bloodrage certainly makes it easier to stick on a target. Especially if youre a twink fury warrior chewing through leveler mages who panic when you do something like... not engage with charge.I do it all the time and have a very high success rate on my fury warrior. They root, i use bloodrage, they blink, i use charge, they try to poly, i interrupt, then we both wait for cds and see what happens next. I've tried to 1v1 mages as arms and it sucks royally.
Whether you want to follow the healer around or go out searching for 1v1s is a matter of playstyle and also the BG. I don't see what you are getting at.The point was more: if youre solo queing on a warrior, the move is to not be seeking out 1v1s. So trying to organize a "best solo que list" based on imagined 1v1s against a specific spec kinda misses the point?
Getting at the "depends on playstyle" part. If your tier list depends on playstyle to determine whether a spec is good or not, then how useful is it? If my play style is to sit in stealth and only open on FCs when they reach ten stacks, then I have a very different idea of what this tier list looks like, yea?I don't see what you are getting at.
I'd love to see your tier list. You can copy my format if you like.Getting at the "depends on playstyle" part. If your tier list depends on playstyle to determine whether a spec is good or not, then how useful is it? If my play style is to sit in stealth and only open on FCs when they reach ten stacks, then I have a very different idea of what this tier list looks like, yea?
I farmed u every bg today and ur just gonna ignore me okI'd love to see your tier list. You can copy my format if you like.
for solo queing? I dont have one. We just got done agreeing it would come down to playstyle and thats gonna vary wildly person to person. I dont see much use in the pursuit of trying to lay down a definitive list like that for people.I'd love to see your tier list. You can copy my format if you like.
I've played 12 bgs today and lost 2. Who are you?I farmed u every bg today and ur just gonna ignore me ok
Can u readI've played 12 bgs today and lost 2. Who are you?
OHHH, you think I'm Derpyderp, no, I'm just Derpy. I got a sham, a warrior, and a rogue. >.<Can u read
[doublepost=1617411544,1617411363][/doublepost]Btw no wonder u put spriest as #5 you just make it look bad
Ok but back to my original question...have u seen me on shadow priest?OHHH, you think I'm Derpyderp, no, I'm just Derpy. I got a sham, a warrior, and a rogue. >.<
Due to popular demand, I moved spriest to #3. And no, I don't think I have.Ok but back to my original question...have u seen me on shadow priest?
Well ur missing outDue to popular demand, I moved spriest to #3. And no, I don't think I have.