Most Complex Class

[Whatgoesup]

So does complexity. Even if no class was particularly complex one of them would be the most complex on a scale from simple to very complex.

Well, I must say, you make a good point here, proper analogy. Touché.

 

[The Saint]

lol best excuse to pussy out, ive ever heard.

that isn't chickening out. that's telling you, you're not capable.

 

[The Saint]

So does complexity. Even if no class was particularly complex one of them would be the most complex on a scale from simple to very complex.

and what i may find complex you may not, and vise versa.

 

[CripzBlood]

There is no complex class at level 20, in my opinion, hence there is no "most complex class", thus my post was on topic. And if everyone knows it that no class is complex, then why are we discussing which class is most complex? Lol. You seem to defeat yourself with your own argument.



I said no class is complex. This is my opinion, as we're giving our opinion here. No class is complex, every class is simple. This implies that there is no such thing as a "most complex class", as no class is complex.

they are all not complex, which the less not complex for you?

its like asking which are best jaja players, since they all are bad u cant choose the best of bads or less bad?


U attempt to try to avoid OP question, and insult ppl in this thread was bad, u clearly interpreted bad OP.


Its funny, so many ppl say lvl20 is so easy but then they cant even play it to its max.

 

[clarification]

and what i may find complex you may not, and vise versa.

Correct, and that's what this thread is for: to discuss / share people's opinions on what they think is the most complex class.

 

[The Saint]

Its funny, so many ppl say lvl20 is so easy but then they cant even play it to its max.

 

[CripzBlood]

that isn't chickening out. that's telling you, you're not capable.

not capable of?

 

[Whatgoesup]

Either a class is simple or it is not. How is that situational? Does the amount of available abilities, macros and actions vary depending on the situation you are in? This thread isn't about effectiveness in certain situations.

A class can become more or less simple in different situations. Ofcourse the amount of available abilties doesn't change, but what does change is wether you use them or not. Which in turn makes the class less or more simple. Anyways, thinking about classes, I can't really pick a least simple class, as in my opinion a lot of the classes are at the same line and it truly depends on situation wether a class becomes more or less simple. I mean, if you play a game as Ele, and there is nothing you can Purge, it's more simpler to play that if you were to play Ret Paladin in a game were loads of off-healing is needed and proper CC etc is needed to kill the vast amount of healers on the opponent team. But, you know, opinions differ.

 

[The Saint]

Correct, and that's what this thread is for: to discuss / share people's opinions on what they think is the most complex class.

and whatgoesup gave his.

 

[clarification]

and whatgoesup gave his.

He questioned the OP and insulted the people in this thread but did he answer the actual question? No.

A class can become more or less simple in different situations. Ofcourse the amount of available abilties doesn't change, but what does change is wether you use them or not. Which in turn makes the class less or more simple. Anyways, thinking about classes, I can't really pick a least simple class, as in my opinion a lot of the classes are at the same line and it truly depends on situation wether a class becomes more or less simple. I mean, if you play a game as Ele, and there is nothing you can Purge, it's more simpler to play that if you were to play Ret Paladin in a game were loads of off-healing is needed and proper CC etc is needed to kill the vast amount of healers on the opponent team. But, you know, opinions differ.

Just because you don't use certain abilities doesn't mean the class is less complex. I mean, a SC2 pro could probably beat a new player with a fraction of the available buttons, units, buildings, strategies, etc. but does that mean SC2 is simple?

 

[Whatgoesup]

they are all not complex, which the less not complex for you?
its like asking which are best jaja players, since they all are bad u cant choose the best of bads or less bad?
U attempt to try to avoid OP question, and insult ppl in this thread was bad, u clearly interpreted bad OP.
Its funny, so many ppl say lvl20 is so easy but then they cant even play it to its max.

I avoid OP question and insult? Lol, sure, keep thinking that. Anyways, answer to your first question below.

A class can become more or less simple in different situations. Ofcourse the amount of available abilties doesn't change, but what does change is wether you use them or not. Which in turn makes the class less or more simple. Anyways, thinking about classes, I can't really pick a least simple class, as in my opinion a lot of the classes are at the same line and it truly depends on situation wether a class becomes more or less simple. I mean, if you play a game as Ele, and there is nothing you can Purge, it's more simpler to play that if you were to play Ret Paladin in a game were loads of off-healing is needed and proper CC etc is needed to kill the vast amount of healers on the opponent team. But, you know, opinions differ.

 

[The Saint]

He questioned the OP and insulted the people in this thread but did he answer the actual question? No.

he said he doesn't think any are complex i.e. all are as simple as each other. or, as complex as each other if it makes people feel better.

 

[CripzBlood]

thats best u can do?

for player who says 20 is so easy and cant play to max of hes class thats pretty weak, u are joke irl, in wow and in forums.
your probelm is ur ego behind a computer.

 

[Whatgoesup]

He questioned the OP and insulted the people in this thread but did he answer the actual question? No.

I don't think I insulted anyone, but if you interperterd it as insulting, then I apologise. I didn't mean it as insulting. You asked me the question, here is my answer:

A class can become more or less simple in different situations. Ofcourse the amount of available abilties doesn't change, but what does change is wether you use them or not. Which in turn makes the class less or more simple. Anyways, thinking about classes, I can't really pick a least simple class, as in my opinion a lot of the classes are at the same line and it truly depends on situation wether a class becomes more or less simple. I mean, if you play a game as Ele, and there is nothing you can Purge, it's more simpler to play that if you were to play Ret Paladin in a game were loads of off-healing is needed and proper CC etc is needed to kill the vast amount of healers on the opponent team. But, you know, opinions differ.

 

[clarification]

he said he doesn't think any are complex i.e. all are as simple as each other. or, as complex as each other if it makes people feel better.

So an arms warrior with charge and like 3 buttons to do damage is as complex as a druid, a shaman or a mage? Sounds like a pretty lazy answer to me.

I don't think I insulted anyone, but if you interperterd it as insulting, then I apologise. I didn't mean it as insulting. You asked me the question, here is my answer:

Already replied to that one a little further up in the thread

 

[Whatgoesup]

Just because you don't use certain abilities doesn't mean the class is less complex. I mean, a SC2 pro could probably beat a new player with a fraction of the available buttons, units, buildings, strategies, etc. but does that mean SC2 is simple?

Now that's a crooked analogy. It doesn't mean that SC2 itself is more simple, the match that is being played is simpler. Just like in different situations different classes are less or more simple.

 

[The Saint]

thats best u can do?

for player who says 20 is so easy and cant play to max of hes class thats pretty weak, u are joke irl, in wow and in forums.
your probelm is ur ego behind a computer.

so what would you do if i wasn't behind a computer?

 

[The Saint]

So an arms warrior with charge and like 3 buttons to do damage is as complex as a druid, a shaman or a mage? Sounds like a pretty lazy answer to me.

depends on the IQ of the player, no?

 

[Whatgoesup]

Already replied to that one a little further up in the thread

Me to you With all this vigerous posting and discussing and editing things get posted at the same time, making the thread look kinda chaotic xD

 

[CripzBlood]

I avoid OP question and insult? Lol, sure, keep thinking that. Anyways, answer to your first question below.

what question?

This thread is full of Hunters trying to think of reasons to justify playing their Hunter, trying to glorify their class and people who think that if a class is underpowered it must mean that it's complex.

how can u deny it?