Most Complex Class

Hunter's have the highest skill cap. Mages are probably second, and I would say priest is third. If you don't agree with me, you need to go look at the definition of skill-cap/ceiling and skill-floor. Your ignorance is showing.
 
Hunter's have the highest skill cap. Mages are probably second, and I would say priest is third. If you don't agree with me, you need to go look at the definition of skill-cap/ceiling and skill-floor. Your ignorance is showing.

finnaly someone who has knowledge, though i would put shaman in third and priest 4th.

but this thread is about which class haves more buttons to smash... lol.
 
finnaly someone who has knowledge, though i would put shaman in third and priest 4th.

but this thread is about which class haves more buttons to smash... lol.

anything that isn't in this guys signature really.
 
Lowbie twink classes complex? I lol'd. To even think any class is even remotely complex is idiotic. This thread is full of Hunters trying to think of reasons to justify playing their Hunter, trying to glorify their class and people who think that if a class is underpowered it must mean that it's complex. Some people here make a few good points, but that's where it ends. Just play whatever you feel like playing, you'll go for the OP over the "complex" anyways.
 
Lowbie twink classes complex? I lol'd. To even think any class is even remotely complex is idiotic. This thread is full of Hunters trying to think of reasons to justify playing their Hunter, trying to glorify their class and people who think that if a class is underpowered it must mean that it's complex. Some people here make a few good points, but that's where it ends. Just play whatever you feel like playing, you'll go for the OP over the "complex" anyways.

we have a winner!

people decided a few patches ago warrs was hard. charge > ms > slam? and level 20 hunters need like 3 macros. c'mon guys, you're only fooling your selves.
 
Lowbie twink classes complex? I lol'd. To even think any class is even remotely complex is idiotic. This thread is full of Hunters trying to think of reasons to justify playing their Hunter, trying to glorify their class and people who think that if a class is underpowered it must mean that it's complex. Some people here make a few good points, but that's where it ends. Just play whatever you feel like playing, you'll go for the OP over the "complex" anyways.

after stating what OP said(no 20 is complex). u feel better now?
news: everyone knows it, now if u managed to post on topic and say which class is most complex of all lvl20s would be great.
 
we have a winner!

people decided a few patches ago warrs was hard. charge > ms > slam? and level 20 hunters need like 3 macros. c'mon guys, you're only fooling your selves.
Who thought playing warrior was hard? :confused: It's the most one dimensional class in the bracket.

Also, I am using more than 10 macro's on my 19 hunter, should be more than that at 20.

And Whatgoesup doesn't seem to know what "most" means.
 
Who thought playing warrior was hard? :confused: It's the most one dimensional class in the bracket.

Also, I am using more than 10 macro's on my 19 hunter, should be more than that at 20.

And Whatgoesup doesn't seem to know what "most" means.

you may have 10, but hunters need seriously 3-5 macros. all in one macros and assist macros are personal preference.
 
after stating what OP said(no 20 is complex). u feel better now?
news: everyone knows it, now if u managed to post on topic and say which class is most complex of all lvl20s would be great.
There is no complex class at level 20, in my opinion, hence there is no "most complex class", thus my post was on topic. And if everyone knows it that no class is complex, then why are we discussing which class is most complex? Lol. You seem to defeat yourself with your own argument.

And Whatgoesup doesn't seem to know what "most" means.

I said no class is complex. This is my opinion, as we're giving our opinion here. No class is complex, every class is simple. This implies that there is no such thing as a "most complex class", as no class is complex.
 
I said no class is complex. This is my opinion, as we're giving our opinion here. No class is complex, every class is simple. This implies that there is no such thing as a "most complex class", as no class is complex.
Let's assume I'd give you a bucket full of sand. I'm sure one grain of sand would be the biggest despite the fact that none of them is actually "big".
 
I said no class is complex. This is my opinion, as we're giving our opinion here. No class is complex, every class is simple. This implies that there is no such thing as a "most complex class", as no class is complex.

Then we will rephrase it for you:

What class is the least simple?
 
Let's assume I'd give you a bucket full of sand. I'm sure one grain of sand would be the biggest despite the fact that none of them is actually "big".

that would depend on scale...
 
that would depend on scale...
So does complexity. Even if no class was particularly complex one of them would be the most complex on a scale from simple to very complex.
Situational.
Either a class is simple or it is not. How is that situational? Does the amount of available abilities, macros and actions vary depending on the situation you are in? This thread isn't about effectiveness in certain situations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top