Fireflash really? Interesting, interesting.
It only really works on holy priest, holy pal to a lesser extent (lesser enough to the point where it's not worth the beacon micro managing just use aurora,) and maybe rdruid for a mid healing set (not holding flag.)
The idea is that fireflash offers the highest healing output, and with
https://www.wowhead.com/spell=200128/trail-of-light on holy priest, you're effectively doubling your crit %.
I run high crit fireflash, about 28% crit and 17% haste outside of BGs (you can guestimate what that is in BGs I just don't remember myself) and around 210ish int with flask.
It's biggest flaw, obviously, is that it's 0% vers. However, ideally, your priest is in the back and not getting touched. It's similar to the veng DH FC theory, it's really good if you can manage not getting caught out, but if you play poorly, you're fucked. You can really feel the 0% vers when people reach you, and you're punished a lot harder for poor positioning than you would be with 15+% vers (usually punishment is just straight up death) but if you play it right, you do more healing.
Going from fireflash holy to aurora disc or even aurora holy is like putting training wheels back on your bike though. Once you're used to playing with 0% vers actually having vers just feels like easy mode.
[doublepost=1598282504,1598281327][/doublepost]
You are alone in this preference. You should know that just by clicking on... I don't know... ANYBODY ELSE'S Character profiles... its just main stat and verse for survivability. We already had the argument earlier where you said it was your personal opinion to not run mainstat/verse because it was "lazy".
Go click on every single link in the veteran's armory list and tell me how many armories out of the like 100 that are on there are pure vers main stat.
While yes I agree that quickblade is nice... Adaptable is just better...
Okay but literally no it's not lol. Crit offers more damage long term than adaptable and I've already told you this. Also, adaptable ring and bracers aren't even bis 2/5 is better.
It an illusion, because the numbers are just not better, I'm sure I can count on one hand the amount of times where 1.2 actually save somebody versus 1.5 on a heal... you are argue different. getting to 1.2 (actual not the fake wow-number) might seem like a nice idea, but you are sacrificing a lot of survivability from losing verse (you already attested to this before)
What spec do you play? I refuse to believe you play a healer. You sacrifice survivability but how about just don't get caught out in the first place? If you're a melee, sure, stack that vers. If you're literally anything else, why do you need the survivability? You shouldn't be getting caught out in the first place. Are you front lining for whatever reason? If you're using tanky sets to compensate for being a poor player just say so man.
I'm basically just pointing out how 99% of "real twinks" are ACTUALLY geared... you seem to have your own opinion on this and I can't see where YOUR DATA is coming from.
My data comes from the experience of the 3000+ BGs I've played in the past year, the
thousands (yes, thousands) of armories I've reviewed, hours and hours of gear / hypothetical theory crafting discussions, funding hundreds of gear sets for players, etc.
Do you know how haste effects DoTs and HoTs? Do you know what the breaking points are for new ticks? Why crit provides more long term damage than pure vers? etc?
Where do you get YOUR data? Because to me it seems ignorant and uninformed.
Lol @ "real twinks." Most of of you are bracket tourists, relax.