Guardian Vs Prot pally

Funnier spec @20?

  • Prot pally

    Votes: 14 63.6%

  • Guardian druid

    Votes: 4 18.2%

  • Feral druid?

    Votes: 4 18.2%
  • Total voters
    22
"Holy is the tankier spec so if you want to play a tank play holy" is a mentality we need less of around here... :KEKW:
 
Around here as in around these forums? Cuz i have never seen you in bgs lol

All talk no practice yet somehow magically top 5%...
 
Waiwhat said:
Reading this horse shit statements about Prot Palas is very chocking. It's like one of the most powerful classes overall in the bracket. Forget talasite and rock full str/haste gems and u will have a banging time in bgs, duels and dungeons.
Click to expand...

Prot is not trash tier spec, and it is not this either. Prot is a reasonably good spec that can do allot of things pretty well. You will not be the most dangerous character on the field, but you will not be a wet noodle that does nothing and sponges resources either.

I know this is hard to believe guys, but not everything has to be either OP or trash. There is a middle ground of effective but not amazing builds and specs.
 
Yet I still somehow know more about the bracket than most of yall.

Sad

edit: p.s. I am still active and playing wargames
 
Fxv said:
Dungeons / duels are fun, pvp is slightly less fun. In the end it’s personal preference and I’d love to see a geared as fuck prot/guardian rather than another cookie cutter survival hunter retard lmao
Click to expand...
Doesn’t rlly matter how “fun” it is to play or that you’d rather see one over a surv. He was saying it was one of the best specs out there which is simply untrue. The 50% dmg taken increase makes any tank spec besides veng dh ( which proves its viability through mobility, utility, hp pool and meta) a joke
 
Chops said:
not everyone needs 20k hks to figure out an hpal with 95 int and a DPS 2hander is a bad idea...
Click to expand...

95 int is bad for wargames, for solo queue pugs it is perfectly fine and optimal. but obviously you don't solo queue pugs enough to know that.

Ya i do agree 2h was not the best idea though due to the loss of block and armor, took me ～8k kills to realize that.
 
Last edited:
ohti said:
You're fucking joking
Click to expand...

Have you not been in BGs with Glance? He is a legend. His version of "perfectly fine and optimal" is dependent on 3 things.

1. Run speed.
2. Green whelp armor to peel off melee who would kill you cuz your heals are dog.
3. Trolling more people into hitting the Glance pinata for the sleep effect than actual healing.
 
Nope not joking, stamina is really good. It does depend on personal preference though, if you are the type of hpal that always picks a good dps and healbot, then high stamina and https://www.wowhead.com/item=7375/green-whelp-armor don't make much sense.

you wouldn't know anyway, as you don't even play pugs.
 
Kracks said:
Doesn’t rlly matter how “fun” it is to play or that you’d rather see one over a surv. He was saying it was one of the best specs out there which is simply untrue. The 50% dmg taken increase makes any tank spec besides veng dh ( which proves its viability through mobility, utility, hp pool and meta) a joke
Click to expand...
What is your definition of viable? What other than the 50% damage increase makes it bad? Are you telling me that any leveler or two could easily kill a bear Druid soley off of that %? Because if you think so I don’t think you’ve ever played at bear or seen one lol
 
Fxv said:
What is your definition of viable? What other than the 50% damage increase makes it bad? Are you telling me that any leveler or two could easily kill a bear Druid soley off of that %? Because if you think so I don’t think you’ve ever played at bear or seen one lol
Click to expand...
My definition of viable is playable against other twinks of similar skill level in a bg or arena setting. Anything is viable against a leveler obv
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 5 (members: 0, guests: 5)
Top