Well, yeah, honestly, i am a very logical person when it comes to decision making in life. Focusing hard on Mathematics and Physics now on college. But, my way of thinking lends towards a creator. I think about it like this, if we found the technology to build up a computer, and a game such as World of Warcraft, we can shape its mechanics in any way. As in, we build something, that is why it exists, rather than there being nothing. From this statement i can say that for a thing to exist it should be created.
It probably may be flawed, i'd like to learn more about it's flaws so i can reflect and think more about it. But as i mentioned, there can or cannot be a creator, that thing no one knows for sure. But i think if science somehow delves into Human's mind deeper, so look for emotions, our spiritual side, we will definitely have a better understanding of what is going on, that's just my opinion, it may actually give no evidence at all haha! But its fun to speculate... at a certain extent.
It's the perfect dilemma really, which is the same as the chicken or the egg question (which one came first?). Without the egg there would be no chicken, and without the chicken, there could be no egg.
Therefore, if there was such a thing as a creator, then who created the creator? And how big of a leap backwards must we take? And this all just comes back to that one little word, "faith". And that is all it is. Either you have this or that point of view, no matter the theist/atheist ideologies (if you can call it that).
In my perfect world, creation-theories, such as whether it being in a religious point of view, or a scientific point of view, should just be a matter of perspective, until one is proven. Whatever you choose to believe, man, it's your (directed at everyone) life. This is of course aimed towards that missing piece of information that goes waaaaaay back (and that is things that has yet to be discovered, and probably never will be, if I'm honest). However, people should not disregard science, and what has been unraveled by it today, and what it will in the future. Like-wise, I think that it is important, when you have a religious view, that you aren't controlled by it's dogmas. You should look at religion as a great many ways of perceiving life. Don't take it literal. Again, my personal view on religion (I'm not religious, but I think that it is important to look at both aspects in a debate), is that it is a way to communicate ethics and social moral. Today, we are perfectly clear about these things (unless you are leaning towards a psycho/sociopathic way of thinking).
So in that sense, to me, religion has now gotten the message across. We know it's wrong to steal, we know that we shouldn't really kill each other etc. Now, the only thing that is left for religion to do, is to leave an open interpretation of how it all began. And science is trying to do the same (and a lot of other things).
Dwelling in every aspect of religion, and using it as a strict, literal form of living is not healthy for you, or the society. I won't get into specifics, because the topic itself is very edgy, and can rub a lot of people the wrong way.
TL;DR: Believe what you wanna believe, as long as it doesn't mean any harm.