yasueh
OG
Defending twinking in the past then hating it cause you play f2p and now its all ok again.
I have not ever failed to make the distinction between those who twink in order to minimise any disadvantage, and seek fair, competitive games, and those who twink to maximise their advantage, seeking unfair, one sided games.
The only time I justified twinking for an advantage was right after XP-lock was implemented and before the battlegroup merge, and the only way to pressure Blizzard into following up on their stated intention of getting twinks out of levelling BGs was, in the short term, through encouraging the tears of said levellers (and because at that time the levellers were largely a bunch of unappreciative little fucks, who couldn't get that some of us wanted working XP locked BGs for their benefit as well as our own).
I am not for or against a person because they play twinks. I am for or against them based upon how and where they play twinks (and I have always felt that if there is any 'ownership' of a bracket, then it is determined by both the proportion of the players that any group contributes towards a bracket, as well as the proportion of their time that they spend playing that bracket).
Now that everyone in the 20-29 bracket has access to the same enchants without it requiring a subscription, and most non-subscribing players have accepted that, I see no reason to take issue with 29s over their gear. Their level does not give them the same advantage they once had.
All that remains is 'Blizzard's commitments'. Namely 'No class should be one-shotting at any level'.