Dirtyauction - 19 Rogue (1080 HD)

Really enjoyed the vid, in the next one though i wouldn't mind seeing some loss's aswell, that's if there is a next one.
 
decent gameplay did seem pretty repetitive but I guess that's just 19s. I find it stupid how trinketing a sap 4 seconds in is actually a good thing and also why did you include the clip of you vs Kevi&&Randy nothing interesting happened at all apart from good peeling by randy and getting faked by kevi.

5:50 highlight of the video.

awful opponents zzz leads to awful games

Why is it always the "top paladins" who hate on Da when he takes the time to shine
 
That's like claiming that 2 + 2 = 5, and then saying 'to each his own' to defend it.

Wait, what? Does not compute cerebral toothpaste eating candle dirt in eyes.
 
That's okay, must be the language barrier and all.

With all seriousness, I don't really get you. [MENTION=10751]Gliiese[/MENTION] said my opinion was biased, regarding the quality of the opponents (because I said that what [MENTION=19427]DjStubbe[/MENTION] said was a fact, and not a hating comment). And I can't really convince him that, infact, what DjStubbe said is a fact, therefore I called it "to each his own".

I don't really see where you're going.
 
With all seriousness, I don't really get you. Gliiese said my opinion was biased, regarding the quality of the opponents (because I said that what DjStubbe said was a fact, and not a hating comment). And I can't really convince him that, infact, what DjStubbe said is a fact, therefore I called it "to each his own".

I don't really see where you're going.

A fact is a fact. An opinion is an opinion.
 
ermmm are we still talking about who has the better rogues? who cares Anarchism is best anyways (fact not opinion)
 
Really enjoyed the vid, in the next one though i wouldn't mind seeing some loss's aswell, that's if there is a next one.

you would be asking da to throw games at that point because he dosent lose wilingly
 
With all seriousness, I don't really get you. Gliiese said my opinion was biased, regarding the quality of the opponents (because I said that what DjStubbe said was a fact, and not a hating comment). And I can't really convince him that, infact, what DjStubbe said is a fact, therefore I called it "to each his own".

I don't really see where you're going.

You can't possibly quantify what Stubbs says as fact, though disregarding it as a hateful opinion is subjective at best. Also logic doesn't work that way. When someone certainly proves you wrong or at very least inaccurate via means of common logic, your subjectivity falls flat.

Let me spell it out for those less inclined.

Subjectivity = a term used to refer to the condition of being a subject, the quality of a subject's perspectives, beliefs, feelings and desires.

Objectivity = a central philosophical concept, related to reality and truth, which has been variously defined by sources. Generally, objectivity means the state or quality of being true even outside of a subject's individual biases, interpretations, feelings, and imaginings.


To put it simply, Euros subjectively think their rogues are better than US rogues, though objectively US rogues have proven themselves countless times in feats of skill.
 
nice vid da. def one of the better rogues. id have to say slyddur is better all around on rogue tho and obv zeno #1 all time
 
You can't possibly quantify what Stubbs says as fact, though disregarding it as a hateful opinion is subjective at best. Also logic doesn't work that way. When someone certainly proves you wrong or at very least inaccurate via means of common logic, your subjectivity falls flat.

Let me spell it out for those less inclined.

Subjectivity = a term used to refer to the condition of being a subject, the quality of a subject's perspectives, beliefs, feelings and desires.

Objectivity = a central philosophical concept, related to reality and truth, which has been variously defined by sources. Generally, objectivity means the state or quality of being true even outside of a subject's individual biases, interpretations, feelings, and imaginings.


To put it simply, Euros subjectively think their rogues are better than US rogues, though objectively US rogues have proven themselves countless times in feats of skill.

Objectively speaking, I've faced the rogue in question, and 3 of the opponents. Altho I can't quantify what Stubbs said, I can say I "tasted" the same ice-cream he did, and found it of inferior quality, because I have "tasted" better ice-screams. But then again, "taste" is subjective. Therefore, to each his own. Yet, I agree that it's not a general fact that the opponents in question are of inferior quality, but it's definetely a de facto for me, as you can cal it "inner fact".

But then again, a fact for me doesn't make it general.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
With that being said if we were including ego's and pride Curley's still a better rogue.

We used to mock [MENTION=4002]Curley[/MENTION] on DetourWoW and Hamcake Land, I even fought him half-naked with my druid. Since when did he become good, if he wasn't even decent?

If he's the cherry on top of the pie of the US, God help you.
 
We used to mock [MENTION=4002]Curley[/MENTION] on DetourWoW and Hamcake Land, I even fought him half-naked with my druid. Since when did he become good, if he wasn't even decent?

If he's the cherry on top of the pie of the US, God help you.
Who are you and how do you know who we got!

Edit: sax, tap and Curley #1
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top