EU Current state of EU 19s

[Roula]

If you want other players to improve start with yourself.

 

[Mvq]

If you want other players to improve start with yourself.

Couldn't agree more.

 

[Yndigo]

What a mess of a thread this is. Just shut up and queue up, thats all people need to do.

This.

And do more plebs.

 

[Shamatix]

But I would just win

Can I spectate? And before doing so, could you please make me one of your sick toast?

Actually forget the spectating, just want a toast

 

[Yndigo]

Can I spectate? And before doing so, could you please make me one of your sick toast?

Actually forget the spectating, just want a toast

fly me out to denmark and ill make you toasts4days

 

[Roula]

Fly me out to Denmark and I'll make you kebab4days @Shamatix

 

[Yndigo]

Fly me out to Denmark and I'll make you kebab4days @Shamatix

Fly us both out and we'll have a cook battle.

 

[Shamatix]

Fly us both out and we'll have a cook battle.

Dayum a cook battle! That actually sounds sick, I know who I would put my money on, but that will be a secret in order to keep the battle entertaining!

 

[Chap]

While I think we all agree that a little drama is healthy, when it ends up taking over a thread, it becomes mostly detrimental. @Devm_eu @Mvq, please take it to PMs or hash it out in-game.

 

[Shamatix]

wot
what have i done

Ye just fuck you! Everyone hates you!!

 

[Devm1]

wot
what have i done

real question is what havent u done
nasty rumors bout u goin on boi

 

[Slacknul]

Ye just duck you! Everyone hates you!!

Buck Flueprint!!1!1!

 

[Druiddroid]

wot
what have i done

Here's the thing. You said "vote manipulation is cheating the site."

Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.

As someone who is a scientist who studies web forums, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls multi-voting cheating. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.

If you're saying "vote manipulation family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of votidae, which includes things from posting quality original content to asking strangers for votes to running vote-bots through proxies. So your reasoning for calling multi-voting cheating is because random people "call the unusual votes cheating?" Let's get copypasta and image macros in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A bot-vote is a bot-vote and a type of vote manipulation. But that's not what you said. You said vote manipulation is cheating, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the vote manipulation family cheating, which means you'd call good posting, bad posting, and copypasta cheating, too. Which you said you don't. It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

 

[Devm1]

Here's the thing. You said "vote manipulation is cheating the site."

Is it in the same family? Yes. No one's arguing that.

As someone who is a scientist who studies web forums, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls multi-voting cheating. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.

If you're saying "vote manipulation family" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of votidae, which includes things from posting quality original content to asking strangers for votes to running vote-bots through proxies. So your reasoning for calling multi-voting cheating is because random people "call the unusual votes cheating?" Let's get copypasta and image macros in there, then, too. Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A bot-vote is a bot-vote and a type of vote manipulation. But that's not what you said. You said vote manipulation is cheating, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the vote manipulation family cheating, which means you'd call good posting, bad posting, and copypasta cheating, too. Which you said you don't. It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

@Blueprint u need some ice on that burn?