clarification
Legend
Might be because Cheeser is actively asking for it.
And to be quite honest, I've got no idea who Hotshots even is.
And to be quite honest, I've got no idea who Hotshots even is.
Hotshots is one of two people actively ddosing.
Seems to me that DDosing is asking for it about 20 million times more than talking trash. Cheeser's position has been clear from the start - he doesn't believe the people that ddosed months ago should get off so easy. Others feel differently. What doesn't seem like it's in dispute is that the entire community should be united against active DDosers but we know for quite some time this hasn't been the case. That needs to change if we expect it to stop.
I have remained quiet on this topic and want it to go away - but to see active DDosers posting and nobody calling them out is just too much.
Hotshots is one of two people actively ddosing.
Seems to me that DDosing is asking for it about 20 million times more than talking trash. Cheeser's position has been clear from the start - he doesn't believe the people that ddosed months ago should get off so easy. Others feel differently. What doesn't seem like it's in dispute is that the entire community should be united against active DDosers but we know for quite some time this hasn't been the case. That needs to change if we expect it to stop.
I have remained quiet on this topic and want it to go away - but to see active DDosers posting and nobody calling them out is just too much.
Hotshots, barb has said you're the one that's been ddosing harvestes wargames nightly. It was a verbal conversation so you should listen(and respond) if you want to deny. And if there's any truth to his statements clarify the situation.
For ppl claiming barb is lying - everything else he's claimed via screenshot or voice comm has been right. I a few cases people had an explanation (living, jameb) why they did do that but wasn't related to ddosing. Others have owned up that they used to do it but don't anymore. So there hasn't been a single case where it was just outright fabricated.
Like I said elsewhere - explain every conversation via writing or verbal with barb on the topic publicly. Then people can judge your response. Saying it publicly allow barb to post evidence if you lie. If you do that I'm happy to evaluate. But until then you're claiming you're the absolutely only person he completely made everything up on when every other example had at least some truth to it. So a blanket denial such as you're giving now is just hard to believe. If you spoke to him give details. If you've never communicated with him ever then say so.
That wasn't what he meant. If you quote someone they receive a notification instead of having to check the thread every now and then to see if you responded.Yeah you know because it's so hard to understand when I'm referring to the post directly above mine. Regardless I'll try to remember.
You are linking the same screenshots that have been linked before. These screenshots are several months old.
Why you are too stupid to look at the dates displayed in the screenshots is beyond me.
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I was looking at this wiki page, hoping to find this 60-day statute of limitations on DDoS crimes, the same statute of limitations that you & your ilk must be referring to with the "several months old" comments. Could you please point out where they make mention of such a short statute of limitations in the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act? I must be really dumb that I do not see any mention of this 60 day (or is it 30 days, or is it 24 hours, 1 hour?) limit on consequences for said DDoS felonies.
Yes.I must be really dumb
Computer Fraud and Abuse Act - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I was looking at this wiki page, hoping to find this 60-day statute of limitations on DDoS crimes, the same statute of limitations that you & your ilk must be referring to with the "several months old" comments. Could you please point out where they make mention of such a short statute of limitations in the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act? I must be really dumb that I do not see any mention of this 60 day (or is it 30 days, or is it 24 hours, 1 hour?) limit on consequences for said DDoS felonies.
no one should be sorry for anything imo -- this isn't a community either. all of you should stop acting like we are, its pathetic