10-19 2015 TC Discussion, Planning, Indiegogo

[Snack]

Even the smartest people have advisors.
And it would put an end to all this "my gear is fair but your gear is unfair BS".

/cheers

Everyone have biased oppinions tho. And imo it will be hard to find someone who have the required knowledge about the 19 bracket to advise Myrm regarding rules and still isn't playing in the TC and have nothing to do with it

 

[Robin_666]

I have nothing to do with the twinkcup, and i say those enchants you guys are talking about seem way to overpowered to be in a tournament, this leg enchant seem to give almost the extra stats or even more extra stats than those Satchel exploited items... i say ban it.

 

[Allybeboba]

There are many people not playing in the TC.
Twinking at 19 has been going on for nearly a decade, not just the past few years. Believe it or not there are twinks that have no desire to get embroiled in the hoopla of the Twink Cup. That is only part of the reason why I suggested an anonymous committee.
There are people out there that like to play their twinks and go unnoticed. That is why they do not link them them in their signatures. As a matter of fact 100% of the posters on page #80 have no character link.
And simply because you have biased opinions does not mean everyone does. That is why we have Justices/Judges as a society.
Have a nice day.

/salud

 

[Bacon]

isnt buying enchanted boas and moving them to your own account considered an exploit though?

Isn't calling it an exploit while attempting to get enchanted boas considered being a hypocrite though?

 

[Bacon]

Feel free to share a legitimate way of transferring heirlooms from one account to another that does not involve GM exploitation.

Feel free to share a legitimate to prove someone "exploited" via GM's to get an enchant and that they haven't already had the enchant.

 

[Bacon]

As a matter of fact 100% of the posters on this page have no character link.

Arkant isn't able to use character links because he's banned though

 

[Rusks]

Som 1 sell me those enchants and I'll show you how stupid they are. I could roll a boomkin have 20 int more than others and that alone would make up for the fact that I've never actually played a Boomkin

 

[clarification]

Feel free to share a legitimate to prove someone "exploited" via GM's to get an enchant and that they haven't already had the enchant.

Other than them admitting that they have done it several times?

 

[Bacon]

Other than them admitting that they have done it several times?

Yes

 

[clarification]

Yes

Glad to hear that no one ever DDoS'd in this bracket then. What a relief.

 

[Bacon]

Glad to hear that no one ever DDoS'd in this bracket then. What a relief.

The difference is that the majority of people obviously got their leg enchants legit. Also just to clarify I think only obtainable gear should be allowed, I don't think hand picking Gf'd things to ban makes any sense what so ever. An advantage is an advantage and people shouldn't complain about people having a gear advantage over someone when they themselves also have a gear advantage

//Maratian

 

[clarification]

The difference is that the majority of people obviously got their leg enchants legit.

Those people don't say that they got them through exploits.

 

[Bacon]

Those people don't say that they got them through exploits.

What forces people to say they exploited?

 

[clarification]

Fact is that the person in question did, not sure what you are trying to argue here.

 

[Bacon]

trying to argue here.

Cute :*

 

[artonkn]

Fact is that the person in question did, not sure what you are trying to argue here.

So now we are targeting specific people to not be allowed GF'd gear.

I can say with certainty that at least 80% of the bracket has used some kind of exploit in their WoW career. Many of these 80% have GF'd gear, does that mean Timmy shouldn't be allowed to use his Inferno Robe because he used a transmog bug on his cloak and therefore may have exploited to get his Inferno Robe?

 

[clarification]

So now we are targeting specific people to not be allowed GF'd gear.

I can say with certainty that at least 80% of the bracket has used some kind of exploit in their WoW career. Many of these 80% have GF'd gear, does that mean Timmy shouldn't be allowed to use his Inferno Robe because he used a transmog bug on his cloak and therefore may have exploited to get his Inferno Robe?

Okay.

 

[Rusks]

If it's not currently available You shouldn't get to use it. That way we don't have any satchel geared GFed enchant toons coming out with huge stat differences

 

[Allybeboba]

Don't forget gems. Can't let that one slip through.

 

[Dramatized]

Doesn't mean he exploited or bought the ones he is currently using.

now you are honestly grasping for straws