Return of the Huntard could it be?

Has Huntards Returned?

  • Yes

    Votes: 37 86.0%

  • No

    Votes: 7 16.3%
  • Total voters
    43
Trialmop

Trialmop

F2P Community Leader
steady shot 10% buff and arcane shot 10% buff.
if you are a alliance hunter you will deal killer damage
but do you think it will be as brutal as cata?

I almost forgot to notify you arcane shot does magical damage meaning a FireHawk is + 5% making the damage increase 15% :D I hope hunters reck every thing in site.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hmm cata i had about 2.4k hp unbuffed and killed whole team in 10 seconds ......it will never go back to that. Even spriest now are not 1/10th as bad as hunters were. If i had less than 50kbs i'd quit for the night cause i figured i was too tired and needed break. Now i go 15-2 17-4 etc. and rarely break 20kbs..
 
Looking at the BG player statistics, it is clear that 'huntards' are back.
But they are no problem because of how terrible they mainly are.
I constantly see hunters trying to kill me with a bird of prey, or a spider.
When I'm FCing.

On a healer.......
/cough
 
90% of the hunters I meet are backpeddling non-stop. Easy kills. They might be strong (not Cata strong tho), but most of the hunters out there are cannon fodder.
 
It will get worse. More hunters inc in the next weeks. Like two months ago when you had up to 6 Protwarriors in WSG.
Otherwise the patch is really good, fixed the Hitbug and I like the scaling but hunters are a bit to strong.
Would have been a chance for Mages/WLs to make a comeback in the bracket, but the chance is gone for 5.3.
 
I personally wouldn't mind more hunters. Most can't make it past mid. But the real reason is, I think people will drop their Pallies in favor of the new FoTM. Then I won't have to hope for a heal and be disappointed each time it doesn't happen.

Breaks my heart each and every time.
 
Saptastic said:
Even spriest now are not 1/10th as bad as hunters were
Click to expand...

Not too sure I agree with that.. Spriests have a much lower skill floor to be effective in this bracket. Hunter could be played by anyone, but it was clear cut who used keybinds/who was the better player. It's a lot harder to tell a decent Spriest from another. They're all scumbags looking for easy kills and it's a shame 24 spriests don't get the same kind of disrespect that hunts did during Cata tbh.. When MoP hit, a few people still played their hunters, if Spriest got nerfed now, they would ALL stop playing. That says a lot for the type of people who play one.
 
I guess watching f2pelis videos is not a good comparison for mop and cata because im doing way more damage in 5.3 and 5.2 than the damage elis is showing in cata. If every1 can remember the last patch of cata hunters got super buffed 35% attack power increase so getting back to that level will be hard. The diference now is only geared hunters will be a problem rather than a random spanish player can make a healer worried. I also agree with twinkens that auto cast is down but the overall damage in bgs might can match up with a cata hunter. well clearly 78k damage in 5.2 showed that but with thisbuff arcane shot is going to be 300 damage +.
 
Dramatized said:
Why was this posted today? Several weeks after 5.3 hit..

Skill floor for hunters is really low atm, the only skill that there is, is how you manage your focus in order to get maximum burst.
Click to expand...

lol Hunters were buffed again so we need about 5 more buffs and we might be at cata damage.
 
Dramatized said:
What has this to do with my post?
Click to expand...

Normally when people say what you said their dreaming that hunters are OP and if you think that its because ur bad. - not saying your bad just that's the reason many complain about hunters.
 
Trialmop said:
Normally when people say what you said their dreaming that hunters are OP and if you think that its because ur bad. - not saying your bad just that's the reason many complain about hunters.
Click to expand...

Please explain how me, being a Hunter, thinking they are easy to play, makes me bad. Shouldn't it be the opposite - if I thought they were hard to master, I'd be bad?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Top