LennywBT
SpeeDIO
no, just sader on fury limited to one.
US WSG 10v10 sign up
- Thread starter Voc
- Start date
LennywBT
SpeeDIO
it could be once game goes into deep stacks, as i said
Chops
Soccer Dad
Seems to me like this would be an exploitable weakness against a warrior with a team running, say, dual mage and dual marks.
I haven't played competitive twink wargames since wrath but I'm not entirely sure id even make room for a warrior in a vet premade team, much less try to assert that they're somehow so overpowered as to be ban worthy.
LennywBT
SpeeDIO
i havent done premades or played twinks to the extent to be able to tell what in bgs, i do agree with that though.
20s now are in the most brutal state balance wise with what ive seen so far
[doublepost=1573233708,1573233648][/doublepost]
Your knowledge of the game.
L
M
A
O
How's the 19 bracket going btw?
whatever is going on between u two, take this shit somewhere else
Chops
Soccer Dad
I've played my warrior a bit in 20s and I can tell you that arms, for sure, would be a joke on a premade team.
Fury MIGHT be better. I can think of one specific instance where we didn't get a cap because I was arms, and we def would have gotten it if I had been fury. But I'm still not sure we'd have won that game.
Warriors just require alot of babysitting. Sure double 'sader is scary but any priest worth their salt is gonna fear bomb as soon as they see that shit proc. I can't tell you how many times I've watched my crusader procs run out while I sit in a stun or a trap.
And assuming a standard "2 per class, 4 healers" limit, I'm not sure where you bring a warrior. Dual arcane, dual hunter, outlaw rogue, boomy/ret... a much preferable set up to a warrior.
LennywBT
SpeeDIO
thus far i agree, idk about ret in rbgs tho compared to fury, then again not enough data to argue pro or against
Chops
Soccer Dad
Yea, this is more or less theory crafting. Nobody really played competitive 10v10 so it's all just assumptive.
I just mentioned ret because of scary holy damage burst, a strong defensive CD, off heals and the stun. But boomy utility is really hard to ignore too. I'd prefer both to fury.
LennywBT
SpeeDIO
on a personal choice id go boomy, much viable and fits my playstyle
also in general terms boomy>warr just bc of invisibility and burst potential, creates confusion and dissolves decision making sometimes on teams whether to sit 1 heals or 2 on def etc
also better rot dps in mid
Kracks
Professional Button Pusher
Limit of 2 stealthies not including fc
[doublepost=1573235186,1573235122][/doublepost]
[doublepost=1573235186,1573235122][/doublepost]
Then why are you arguing to ban fury??
LennywBT
SpeeDIO
there are situations it can be deadly in unacceptable terms
that is my condition, its dmg output insane on a non-stacked efc, let alone on a 6+.
i made my case, what is this question ?
Kracks
Professional Button Pusher
Every class has its advantages in specific scenarios...you seem to just have a personal vendetta against warriors much like drzzt-cba has for me.
LennywBT
SpeeDIO
i havent played this bracket(dogshit as it is) for 1+ good year on a continuous manner to have a vendetta towards anything, just speaking from 1. what ive been told 2. what ive seen a fury do
Kracks
Professional Button Pusher
So you aren’t even active in the current meta and you think u can determine what’s banned or not in wargames? Please stop talking.
xanx
Veteran
So are you gonna participate on f2p then? if everyone is shit then its just laid back games you can drink while playing. Sounds right down your alley since you cant do av on that toon anyway
LennywBT
SpeeDIO
rather stop talking than participate in this meta, but still the point for fury stands, 2 saders/saderswap is just bad. put it however u want
Chops
Soccer Dad
I was more mocking the fact that the premade never happened rather than calling the people that might have signed up for it "bad".
And I can que AV on my F2P as of yesterday afternoon. Thankyouverymuch
Kracks
Professional Button Pusher
Okay bye thanks for your very informed opinions.